Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "metaprl".
2008 Jul 31
0
[LLVMdev] Is there room for another build system?
...quite often.
An approach like scons, which does not rely on legacy tools, seems more
robust to me. At least we can expect a similar behavior of the build
system on all the supported platforms. I haven't tried scons itself, but
my company is happily using the OMake build system
http://omake.metaprl.org/index.html
OMake has binary packages for several architecture and it does not
depend on external tools. It comes with a cross-platform and high-level
shell built-in. Automatic dependencies are computed dynamically, and
recompilation is triggered by digests, not timestamps. We build our
ent...
2008 May 17
5
[LLVMdev] VS build is broken again
On May 17, 2008, at 2:44 PM, Óscar Fuentes wrote:
> I don't know how much LLVM build system is tied to the GNU toolchain
> or
> how much it depends on *nix features, but suppossing that adding
> support
> for MSVC++ is impractical, perhaps it would be simpler to implement a
> Makefile-based build system for MSVC++ than to keep up to date the
> project files. This would
2008 Jul 30
16
[LLVMdev] Is there room for another build system?
[Repost: The mailing list was down yesterday. Sorry if this is a
duplicate]
I'm evaluating CMake (1) primarily as an alternative build system for
Visual Studio users, although it can easily be a replacement for
`configure' and hand-made makefiles too, providing a single build system
for all platforms. CMake is a tool that takes a project description and
configures, generates makefiles,