Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "metapoint".
Did you mean:
datapoint
2015 Jun 19
4
[LLVMdev] Long-Term Support for LLVM Projects Extension to Build System?
...as the Makefiles would, theoretically, all go away
> at the end. I don't think anyone has plans of replacing this
> functionality (Chris?), but migrating out of tree projects to hook
> in via modifying the cmake build locally shouldn't be too bad.
>
This is also related to the metapoint that the cmake build system doesn't glob for source files (or anything else), unlike the makefile build system. This is understandable given the constraints, but we might want to restore some of that functionality for the purpose of supporting out-of-tree projects.
What I mean specifically, is...
2015 Jun 19
3
[LLVMdev] Long-Term Support for LLVM Projects Extension to Build System?
...projects that don't
need to patch the existing LLVM tools.
Regards,
John Criswell
On 6/18/15 9:06 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 5:50 PM Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov
> <mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov>> wrote:
>
> This is also related to the metapoint that the cmake build system
> doesn't glob for source files (or anything else), unlike the
> makefile build system. This is understandable given the
> constraints, but we might want to restore some of that
> functionality for the purpose of supporting out-of-tree pro...
2015 Jun 19
2
[LLVMdev] Long-Term Support for LLVM Projects Extension to Build System?
...projects that don't need to patch the
> existing LLVM tools.
>
> Regards,
>
> John Criswell
>
>
> On 6/18/15 9:06 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 5:50 PM Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
>
>> This is also related to the metapoint that the cmake build system doesn't
>> glob for source files (or anything else), unlike the makefile build system.
>> This is understandable given the constraints, but we might want to restore
>> some of that functionality for the purpose of supporting out-of-tree
>> pro...
2015 Jun 19
3
[LLVMdev] Long-Term Support for LLVM Projects Extension to Build System?
On 6/18/15 6:49 PM, Eric Christopher wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Long term we don't want to keep the burden of two build systems in
> tree. CMake is turning out to be the build system we want because of
> its multi-platform support, etc and as soon as the CMake system can do
> everything we can do with the autoconf/makefile build I plan on
> turning down the support for that