Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "metadata_kind_block_id".
2015 Oct 20
2
Question about METADATA_BLOCKs in bitcode
...implementation of this handling for the upstream
patches, I am reassessing how to do this perhaps more robustly. A few
options:
1) Should the two module-level blocks use different block ids since
they hold different types of records? I.e. a METADATA_BLOCK_ID
(holding the actual metadata) and a new METADATA_KIND_BLOCK_ID (for
the metadata kind records). That way it is more obvious what the two
separate blocks are for and it is also much more trivial to identify
and skip just the former.
2) Should I simply continue to assume that we will have two
METADATA_BLOCKs at module level and that the kinds will always be in...
2017 Apr 04
3
RFC: Adding a string table to the bitcode format
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <
dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote:
>
> On 2017-Apr-04, at 12:12, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 8:13 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Apr 3, 2017, at 7:08 PM, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> wrote:
>>