search for: metacran

...view the forks as the actual canonical sources for the package. Also, the archive use-case, while near and dear to my own heart, seems explicitly different from the "look at the package as it is now" use-case that the forks are actually being used for. To be clear, I think a lot of the metacran stuff is great. I use the APIs myself and Gabor's work on this stuff is great. I just think there are some pitfalls here. >From the email Gabor just sent out, it sounds like he and I agree about this stuff anyway. I was really responding to the proposal that the repositories actually be fo...

...l.com> > To: "Gabriel Becker" <gmbecker at ucdavis.edu> > Cc: "Simon Urbanek" <simon.urbanek at r-project.org>, "Rainer M Krug" <Rainer at krugs.de>, r-devel at r-project.org > Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 10:55:02 AM > Subject: Re: [Rd] MetaCran website v1.0.0-alpha > > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Gabriel Becker > <gmbecker at ucdavis.edu> > wrote: > > > That's true, but issues, checkouts, comments, credit, etc should > > all be > > going to the original repo. > > > You mean the...

Hi! I'm developing R packages and use Travis CI for continous integration. When submitting to CRAN Im suggestet to test the package using the latest R-devel. I would like that all test where run using Travis. Is there anyone who knows if this is possible to run travis test using the latest r-devel? -- Regards M?ns ============================ M?ns Magnusson 070 - 588 97 15 mons.magnusson

G?bor Cs?rdi <csardi.gabor at gmail.com> writes: > Dear All, > > [ I was wondering if this should have gone to the new mailing list. Maybe. ] > > As some of you maybe know from my earlier posts, I am building a simple > search engine for R packages. Now the search engine has a proper web site, > where you can also browse CRAN packages. > > http://www.r-pkg.org/

On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 10:55 AM, G?bor Cs?rdi <csardi.gabor at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Gabriel Becker <gmbecker at ucdavis.edu> > wrote: > >> That's true, but issues, checkouts, comments, credit, etc should all be >> going to the original repo. > > > You mean the links? They are, aren't they? > Sort of, the link

On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Gabriel Becker <gmbecker at ucdavis.edu> wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Yihui Xie <xie at yihui.name> wrote: > >> I cannot speak for other package authors, but for all my own packages, >> I have provided the BugReports field in DESCRIPTION that points to the >> Github issues page. You can probably use this field to

On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 8:28 PM, Simon Urbanek <simon.urbanek at r-project.org> wrote: > One issue I have with this is that it doesn't point to the original GitHub > repositories of the packages, so you end up with additional repositories on > Github in Gabor's name that have nothing to do with the actual Github > repositories of the packages. I understand that it's

On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Uwe Ligges <ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de > wrote: > Thanks for letting us know about the new website. Some comments: - Download statistics: Where are they from? CRAN does not monitor downloads > generally, maybe some selected mirrors do. > It's the RStudio mirror only. It is mentioned on the Services page and on the page of the

I cannot speak for other package authors, but for all my own packages, I have provided the BugReports field in DESCRIPTION that points to the Github issues page. You can probably use this field to check if a package is on Github or not. If it is, you may just fork the original repo instead of creating a new one from the CRAN package. I'm not sure how technically difficult it would be for you.

On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Gabriel Becker <gmbecker at ucdavis.edu> wrote: > That's true, but issues, checkouts, comments, credit, etc should all be > going to the original repo. You mean the links? They are, aren't they? [...] > >From the email Gabor just sent out, it sounds like he and I agree about > this stuff anyway. I was really responding to the

On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Gabriel Becker <gmbecker at ucdavis.edu> wrote: [...] > > Well, sort of. I mean if the package is being actively developed not on > github, forking your archive repo and developing a patch/etc against it > won't necessarily be particularly effective, as there is no way to have the > right starting point (state of trunk), right? > Well,

... making array.d from array.c array.c:33:23: fatal error: duplicate.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. ... https://travis-ci.org/metacran/r-builder/builds/71225331#L7405 fyi. Gabor

Dear All, [ I was wondering if this should have gone to the new mailing list. Maybe. ] As some of you maybe know from my earlier posts, I am building a simple search engine for R packages. Now the search engine has a proper web site, where you can also browse CRAN packages. http://www.r-pkg.org/ As I see the value is in 1. package search (search box on top right) 2. APIs, see

On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 12:45 AM, G?bor Cs?rdi <csardi.gabor at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 8:28 PM, Simon Urbanek <simon.urbanek at r-project.org> > wrote: > >> One issue I have with this is that it doesn't point to the original GitHub >> repositories of the packages, so you end up with additional repositories on >> Github in Gabor's

One issue I have with this is that it doesn't point to the original GitHub repositories of the packages, so you end up with additional repositories on Github in Gabor's name that have nothing to do with the actual Github repositories of the packages. I understand that it's technically necessary, but I fear it will lead to a lot of confusion... On May 24, 2015, at 5:44 AM, Rainer M

Thanks for letting us know about the new website. Some comments: - Download statistics: Where are they from? CRAN does not monitor downloads generally, maybe some selected mirrors do. - Section "Recently updated" can only hold 9 packages, but frequently more than 9 get accepted even within an hour, hence not sure if this makes sense. - The links "Download R" and "CRAN

...gt;> on Thu, 16 Jul 2015 07:18:00 -0400 writes: > > > ... > > making array.d from array.c > > array.c:33:23: fatal error: duplicate.h: No such file or directory > > compilation terminated. > > ... > > > https://travis-ci.org/metacran/r-builder/builds/71225331#L7405 > > Yes. That's what R-devel is: "in development" and so, human errors do happen. > ... and are corrected. ... already more than half an hour ago. Hmm, I'm a bit confused. Now we can find duplicate.h in trunk, but it still seems to be m...

Hello Chris, I was implying you are capable enough to implement it, while you have already identify a research paper. If there is no package out there, uploading to CRAN would help future user too. I am more than happy to help if you want to implement from scratch. Best, Mehmet On 27 June 2017 at 17:45, Chris Buddenhagen <cbuddenhagen at gmail.com> wrote: > Does anyone know of some

Hi, I?ve been using R on and off for a couple of years. I think R is pretty great but one thing I?d like to see improved is the way packages are organised. Instead of CRAN being a long list of packages having a short & usually unintelligible name I ?d like to see packages organised in a hierarchical way with that path acting as a hierarchical namespace just like you have in many other

Does anyone know of some code, and examples that implement game theory/Nash equilibrium hypothesis testing using existing packages like igraph/statnet or similar? Perhaps along the lines of this article: Zhang, Y., Aziz-Alaoui, M. A., Bertelle, C., & Guan, J. (2014). Local Nash Equilibrium in Social Networks, *4*, 6224. Best, Chris Buddenhagen cbuddenhagen at gmail.com [[alternative HTML