search for: metacontent

Version 2.0-0 of meta (an R package for meta-analysis) is now available on CRAN. Changes are described below. Yours, Guido Major revision R package meta linked to R package metafor by Wolfgang Viechtbauer to provide additional statistical methods, e.g. meta-regression and other estimates for tau-squared (REML, ...) New functions: - metareg (meta-regression) - metabias

Version 2.0-0 of meta (an R package for meta-analysis) is now available on CRAN. Changes are described below. Yours, Guido Major revision R package meta linked to R package metafor by Wolfgang Viechtbauer to provide additional statistical methods, e.g. meta-regression and other estimates for tau-squared (REML, ...) New functions: - metareg (meta-regression) - metabias

Hi, I want to do a meta-analysis with count data for treatement/control cases. Mi problem is that I need to use zero values (an informative zero value) for the mean and standard deviation for one of the treatement, but R has a problem: "Studies with zero values for sd.e or sd.c get no weight in meta-analysis". I can agroup the case by Family (byvar=Family). ¿Can you help me? Thanks!

Estimado Gracias por su ayuda José 2023-05-06 19:47 GMT-04:00, Carlos Ortega <cof en qualityexcellence.es>: > Hola, > > Si añades lo que destaco, defines el layout y queda más ajustado en la > pantalla. > > #-------------------------- > library(readxl) > Sistolica <- read_excel("./Sistolica1.xlsx") > library(meta) > m <- metacont( >

Hi I'm conducing a meta-analysis using the meta package. Here's a bit of code that works fine - tmp <- metacont(samplesize.2, pctdropout.2, sddropout.2, samplesize.1, pctdropout.1, sddropout.1, data=Dataset, sm="WMD") I would now like to control for a couple of variables (continuous and categorical) that aren't in the equation. Is meta

Hi! I want to do a meta-analysis with count data for treatement/control cases. Mi problem is that I need to use zero values (an informative value) for the mean and standard deviation for one of the treatement, but R has a problem: "Studies with zero values for sd.e or sd.c get no weight in meta-analysis". I can agroup the case by Family (byvar=Family). ¿anybody help me? Thanks! >

Hello, I experimented the Metafor and Meta packages in the scope of replacing Excel for meta-analysis. I performed the first working example provided in Michael Borenstein's book "Introduction to Meta-Analysis" with Excel, Metafor and Meta. The numbers given by my spreadsheet, which I validated from Borenstein's book, conrespond quite closely to those given by Meta, but

Estimados Como logro en el forest plot que el gráfico quede en unos margenes que se pueda ver completo. Adjunto archivo saludos José library(readxl) Sistolica <- read_excel("000 EN DISEñO/0000 eli cardio 2/0000 para metanalisis/Sistolica.xlsx") library(meta m <- metacont(Ne, Me, Se, Nc, Mc, Sc, studlab=paste(Author, year), forest(m) funnel(m) ------------ próxima

...using the incoming MPEG7 standard. > It is based on XML syntax and use > XML Schema to make the validation according > to the MPEG7 DDL and Description Schemes. > > In fact, one important thing is also to think > about the production part, > that is to think how we can produce metacontent > using MPEG7 specs. > > Cld I agree, and hopefully the DTD developed for the OggSquish metadata will be compatible with MPEG7 (I'm copying this to the vorbis-dev list, though I think this has already been agreed upon). Since I think that we've agreed on OggSquish as the stream...