search for: messier

...11--13, \url{http://CRAN.R-project.org/doc/Rnews/} to the gtools package (provided that Thomas gives his OK). And I've encountered an error in how R CMD check is extracting the example code I have in the .Rd file. The example section contains the lines # An equivalent function is somewhat messier, since it must either explicitly # construct the y axis label, duplicating some of the work of the plot # function: plotit <- function( df, var, col="red", title="" ) { dname <- deparse(substitute(df)) vname <- deparse(substitute(var)) plot( df...

...IR-level passes can insert target-specific intrinsics, those can be matched to pseudo instructions, and those pseudo instructions can be expanded (as late as necessary) by a custom inserter. I agree that this may add more boiler-plate work, but it is not immediately obvious why this would be 1000x messier. > > -Hal I should probably qualify this with "1000 times messier for me" :) In this case the whole problem fit neatly in a simple IR level module pass. I had to create an alternate calling convention for one part but otherwise this IR pass made an otherwise very messy problem...

...pecific >> intrinsics, those can be matched to pseudo instructions, and those pseudo >> instructions can be expanded (as late as necessary) by a custom inserter. I >> agree that this may add more boiler-plate work, but it is not immediately >> obvious why this would be 1000x messier. >> >> -Hal > > I should probably qualify this with "1000 times messier for me" :) > > In this case the whole problem fit neatly in a simple IR level module pass. > > I had to create an alternate calling convention for one part but otherwise > this IR &g...

...> intrinsics, those can be matched to pseudo instructions, and those pseudo >>> instructions can be expanded (as late as necessary) by a custom inserter. I >>> agree that this may add more boiler-plate work, but it is not immediately >>> obvious why this would be 1000x messier. >>> >>> -Hal >> I should probably qualify this with "1000 times messier for me" :) >> >> In this case the whole problem fit neatly in a simple IR level module pass. >> >> I had to create an alternate calling convention for one part but o...

...nd those >>>> pseudo >>>> instructions can be expanded (as late as necessary) by a custom >>>> inserter. I >>>> agree that this may add more boiler-plate work, but it is not >>>> immediately >>>> obvious why this would be 1000x messier. >>>> >>>> -Hal >>> >>> I should probably qualify this with "1000 times messier for me" :) >>> >>> In this case the whole problem fit neatly in a simple IR level module >>> pass. >>> >>> I had to cre...

...IR-level passes can insert target-specific intrinsics, those can be matched to pseudo instructions, and those pseudo instructions can be expanded (as late as necessary) by a custom inserter. I agree that this may add more boiler-plate work, but it is not immediately obvious why this would be 1000x messier. -Hal > > There are other stubs to be created for other parts of the mips32 > port. > > So I'd like to get a solution to these ugly APP/NOAPP markers. > > Maybe you would not do things this way but I think it's a perfectly > valid approach. > No two people h...

Hi, I'm struggling with errbar graphics. I'm trying to plot an x-y graph with correct labelling, however can't seem to get main and sub to show on my graph. They do work when I use title(main="," etc...., but this will make it look at lot messier,I'll have to blank out ylab=" " , and I need to try and get the titles to update automatically according to my excel column headings and paste function. Example code.... require(Hmisc) data1<-array(sample(1:100,35),dim=c(5,7)) data1[,1]<-1:5 sd=apply(data1[,2:7],1,sd) mean=row...

Hi list, Is there a function that can let me know which functions are being debugged? I know I'm probably not doing a very good job of keeping track of things, but it does get messier when you dig into different layers of a function. I know there is "isdebugged", but it only works on one function at a time. Thanks! ...Tao [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...rote: > > I'd rather we use a crypto hash so we don't have to compare content at all. > The crypto hashes work well if the atom content is const data (e.g. c-string or other literals), since you just point the hash function at the range of bytes in the constant data. Where it gets messier is if you are trying to coalesce non-leaf functions or non-const data because it is not just the content bytes that need to be compared but also all the references must somehow be incorporated into the hash. For example, two functions have the exact same instruction bytes, but one calls foo and one...

...t; -Nick > > I'd rather we use a crypto hash so we don't have to compare content at all. The crypto hashes work well if the atom content is const data (e.g. c-string or other literals), since you just point the hash function at the range of bytes in the constant data. Where it gets messier is if you are trying to coalesce non-leaf functions or non-const data because it is not just the content bytes that need to be compared but also all the references must somehow be incorporated into the hash. For example, two functions have the exact same instruction bytes, but one calls foo and one...

...plus ordinary type composition and exclude function templates (or at least, function templates with dependent expressions in the signature), it's probably not too hard (i.e., just a day or a few days work) to code up a mangler. If more is needed (local types, decltype, lambdas, etc.), it gets messier quite quickly. Daveed

...encoding was > actually never passed to the vignette engine: > https://github.com/wch/r-source/blob/e721ef5f4/src/library/tools/R/Vignettes.R#L507 > Apparently only the file and quiet arguments are passed to the > vignette engine. Did I miss anything? I think it's actually a little messier than that: sometimes the encoding is passed (e.g. by tools:::.run_one_vignette, used in R CMD check), but not always. Here's what I think should happen instead: When building a vignette in a package, R knows the encoding declared for the package, so it should assume this as the default for t...

On Mon, April 10, 2017 4:17 pm, John R Pierce wrote: > On 4/10/2017 1:57 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> In what universe are those "consistant" device names, as opposed to >> eth[0...]? And how could it help automated scripts that you can run on >> *any* system you're administering? > > if I have a Intel gigE interface and a Marvell 10g interfaces,

I have encountered a need for manually generating the mangled name of an arbitrary C++ function. The only way I currently know how to do this is to generate a dummy C++ source file, compile it, and look at the output. This approach is so ugly that I would like for it never to see the light of day. The c++filt tool generates demangled C++ names given the mangled ones, which is the opposite

My understanding was that at the beginning of each run the puppetmaster imports all modules so that any includes at the top level are applied directly. However, I am not so sure anymore. I''ve been tracing how this works and it seems like modules are included more lazily. In other words, when able_to_import is called seems like when the magic happens, rather than up front when the run

I have a Newbee question: i have three tables and want to connect them. so is it stupid to make a triple m:n (rails style xs_ys_zs) or do i have to make a new table (newtable) where i got multiple 1:n? the habtm (has and belongs to many) do only work proper to join two tables, or i am wrong? -jens -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

simple question: how do I output something from within <% %> tags? e.g. like ''echo'' in PHP. I thought it would be ''puts'' or ''print'' but neither seems to work. right now I always close the %> and open a <%= which is tedious. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...lot around > unix style sharing rather than Windows ACL's and that transition may > be a bit messy. Therefore they want to run Samba AD in docker and > have the primary instance of samba with its unix-style sharing join > to it. They want a one box solution. It is going to be even messier than what you think ;-) I take it ClearOS didn't get the message, there is NEVER going to be a Samba AD DC on RHEL, so, unless ClearOS comes up with their own Samba packages, they (like Centos) will never be able to provision a DC using distro packages. > > Other distros have managed AD...

On 05/06/2013 07:52 AM, Rafael Espíndola wrote: > On 6 May 2013 10:29, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: >> I want to disable the #APP/#NOAPP for compiler generated inline asm. >> >> Unfortunately, you can change the string APP,NOAPP, but it still will put >> the "#" there and create >> a line. >> >> In the comments it said that

...h-level we need to solve the following problems: > > - Assign addresses more than once > > - Maintain state between successive calls of createThunks() > > - Synchronization of the linker script and the OutputSection after > adding thunks > > This last past seems to be the messier. The issue is not with the > patch, is with the existing infrastructure that uses a completely > different representation for linker scripts and non linker scripts. > > What I think is needed is for the writer to create a dummy "script" > and use what is now LinkerScript::a...