search for: message_date_parse

Hi, is it expected that dovecot 2.0.beta4 pass all of it's self-tests or some failures are normal? I've tried make check and everything passed up to this test: ... message_date_parse(7) ................................................ : ok 0 / 8 tests failed test-message-decoder.c:67: Assert failed: message_decoder_decode_next_block(ctx, &input, &output) test-message-decoder.c:78: Assert failed: output.size == 3 test-message-decoder.c:84: Assert failed: output.size ==...

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.6.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.6.tar.gz.sig * IDLE: Interval between mailbox change notifies is now 1 second, because some clients keep a long-running IDLE connection and use other connections to actually read the mails. * SORT: If Date: header is missing or broken, fallback to using INTERNALDATE (as the SORT draft

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.6.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.6.tar.gz.sig * IDLE: Interval between mailbox change notifies is now 1 second, because some clients keep a long-running IDLE connection and use other connections to actually read the mails. * SORT: If Date: header is missing or broken, fallback to using INTERNALDATE (as the SORT draft