search for: meritocrats

On 2018-05-07 07:46, Unnamed Poster via llvm-dev wrote: > The act of committing world-class technology expertise into a project, > does not > come with strings attached, such as an obligation to interact with > anyone for > any reason. Everything else in this post aside, if everyone who seriously believes the above leaves the project, it will inevitably improve the code quality

On 7 May 2018 at 11:10, whitequark via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> The act of committing world-class technology expertise into a project, >> does not >> come with strings attached, such as an obligation to interact with anyone >> for >> any reason. > > Everything else in this post aside, if everyone who seriously believes the > above

...at managing social circumstances and therefore prefer to leave, while the less qualified people envy the performance of the more qualified, and so the less qualified try to prey on the more qualified up to the point that the project is socially bankrupt. The highly qualified people are in nature meritocrats because the tech and academic details of the project is frequently the only thing they are really fluent in, and any risk of being judged by any other standard than material project merit would be felt as immensely offputting to them, and so hence the competence exodus. For this reason I suggest...

...ing social circumstances and therefore prefer to leave, while the less qualified people envy the performance of the more qualified, and so the less qualified try to prey on the more qualified up to the point that the project is socially bankrupt. > > The highly qualified people are in nature meritocrats because the tech and academic details of the project is frequently the only thing they are really fluent in, and any risk of being judged by any other standard than material project merit would be felt as immensely offputting to them, and so hence the competence exodus. > > For this reason I...

...cumstances and therefore prefer to leave, while > the less qualified people envy the performance of the more qualified, and > so the less qualified try to prey on the more qualified up to the point > that the project is socially bankrupt. > > The highly qualified people are in nature meritocrats because the tech and > academic details of the project is frequently the only thing they are > really fluent in, and any risk of being judged by any other standard than > material project merit would be felt as immensely offputting to them, and > so hence the competence exodus. > &gt...

Hello everyone, We are in the process of formalizing the governance model of the GlusterFS project. Historically, the governance of the project has been loosely structured. This is an invitation to all of you to participate in this discussion and provide your feedback and suggestions on how we should evolve a formal model. Feedback from this thread will be considered to the extent possible in

On 5 May 2016 at 21:47, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > The Swift community has been using the standard "Contributor Covenant” to > good effect: > https://swift.org/community/#code-of-conduct > http://contributor-covenant.org > > Why do we need to “innovate" here? Hi Chris, I think the swift code is simple, and albeit

The CentOS Project seems to be having a problem within some of our community interactive areas that we need to address. As most of you know, the project provides CentOS software free of charge and we also provide community areas like a Wiki, Mailing Lists, IRC Channels and Fora for our users to interact with one another and allow the CentOS community to provide support for each other. There are

Greetings all, This has come up a few times, and I would like to resume the effort to establish an LLVM code of conduct. First and foremost, many thanks to Philip Reames who sat down with me several months ago and worked through a number of suggestions that I've tried to incorporate into an updated patch with the draft text: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13741 I think his updates plus a few