search for: meritocraci

Renato Golin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > If we want to go for meritocracy, which I think most people would > agree, then it would have to be people that already represent the > community, internally or externally. Given your close attention to representation I know that you have all the best intentions here, so please take this in the spirit of productive

I try not to post my real name on the internet. I'm basically asking for commit access for user sub page space for formatting, & staging of documents for management review. When I'm actually @ linbit ill probably start the motions to have an official account something like "linbit-usa" to publish the works under. I'm used to mediawiki, moinmoin wiki is new to me.

On Jul 29, 2015, at 6:19 PM, Nathan Duehr <denverpilot at me.com> wrote: > >> On Jul 28, 2015, at 6:32 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: >> >> Now we have entrenched commercial interests that get paid more when you get DDoS?d. I?ll give you one guess what happens in such a world. > > What happens? Folks have to think harder about connecting

> On Jul 28, 2015, at 6:32 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > > On Jul 28, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Nathan Duehr <denverpilot at me.com> wrote: >> >>> On Jul 28, 2015, at 11:27, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: >>> >>> So no, your local password quality policy is not purely your own concern. >> >> Other than

Dear Arc, I feel ashamed of the xiph community. I was always one standing up for the open audio-visual codecs and applications that were developed here and I felt part of that community by contributing. There have been an enormous number of people contributing to xiph specifications and software over the years. Your emails have been an insult to every contributor to xiph that is not in the

Silvia.Pfeiffer@csiro.au wrote: > Dear Arc, > > I feel ashamed of the xiph community. Hi Silvia, My slant on this is slightly different. The vast majority of Free Software and Open Source projects are meritocracies. Certain people get to positions of power in these projects through a combination of good coding/ debugging/documentation and simultaneously an ability to work well with the other people in the project. Here in the Xiph community things are a little askew. The people with the code (Monty, Jean-M...

On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 10:36:14AM +1100, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Here in the Xiph community things are a little askew. The people > with the code (Monty, Jean-Marc, Josh Coalson etc and the Annodex > team) seem to let Arc (who has yet to show any contribution > anywhere near the same league as any of the above) run the show > and trammple over people who show far more merit.

Hi all, It seems like I should have joined in earlier. First, just in case it wasn't already clear to everyone, Arc is in no way talking on behalf of Xiph, certainly not me, and (as far as I understand) not Monty either. So his cluelessness and stubbornness represents only himself. Arc, I really dislike the way you've behaved, especially towards Zen (your off-list threat to Zen is simply

Hi, How about creating another mailing list to let people vent themselves? It would make it easier for everyone, since technical/troubleshooting issues and opinions target different people. This messages is a test as well. I couldn't write to the list through gmane so I corrected the address with gmane admin. Hope this works. Regards,

Our previous attempts to select a project name for CompComm have not gone well. We tried a poll but the names in the poll were not pre-qualified to determine if they were usable and the ?winning? name was also a strongly disliked name. Kristian and I each proposed a plan to select a name, but that effort got sidetracked by a massive flame war on the mailing list. While our community has some

We are looking for a Senior Project Manager - SCRUM Master for a new office in Poland, in Warszawa or Krakow What we are looking for: The Scrum Master has day-to-day responsibility for managing complex Agile software development projects to completion. Responsible for all aspects of the development/implementation of highly complex Global analytics platform projects using Scrum methodology •

We are planning to employ 2 Senior Front End Developers in Poland, in Warszawa or Krakow What we are looking for: A full-stack engineer with serious front end development chops and ability to integrate into backend application written in Ruby. We are a design centric organization and are looking for folks that share our passion for clean and simple design that’s modern and approachable.

As requested on http://wiki.centos.org/Contribute, here is my info: # your FirstnameLastname username [SteveBonds] # the proposed subject of your Wiki contribution(s) [Personal Page] # the proposed location of your Wiki contribution(s) [Personal Page] I'll branch out from here. Maybe. While I understand the problem with spammers, asking each user to send each proposed page to the list for

Hello everyone, We are in the process of formalizing the governance model of the GlusterFS project. Historically, the governance of the project has been loosely structured. This is an invitation to all of you to participate in this discussion and provide your feedback and suggestions on how we should evolve a formal model. Feedback from this thread will be considered to the extent possible in

Hi Everyone, Numerous people have been bringing up challenges with consensus driven decision making in the LLVM community. After considering this and seeing the frustrations it is causing many people, I think we should make a formal process change to help improve decision making going forward. Here is the outline of the draft proposal

On Wed, December 9, 2015 16:50, James Hogarth wrote: > On 9 Dec 2015 9:07 p.m., "Lamar Owen" <lowen at pari.edu> wrote: >> > >> No, it seems to me that a suitably motivated CentOS user needs to >> scratch this itch; and, no, I am not volunteering, as I've >> followed Fedora before......and just simply cannot give the >> time to it at this

On Tue, December 8, 2015 11:05, Matthew Miller wrote: > >> I have been bitten by things done in Fedora that only have any use >> on >> a laptop and that should never have been allowed into a server >> distribution. But I cannot see how I would have been aware of them >> until they manifested themselves on equipment under my care. By >> which > > ^

Dear Community, I recently started thinking about how to make a project like CentOS more transparent and open (especially for new contributors). The http://wiki.centos.org/Team page (which Dag created about a year ago) lists about 20 (more or less active) members, divided into core and community contributors. I personally do not like that kind of distinction. Of course there should be something

What unmitigated bullshit. Your attempt at logic is laughable. You hold up threadbare stereotypes as the norm, when in reality they are little more than characters straight out of Central Casting. The "genius hermit who can't associate with people" is dumb and false. It's meant to excuse behavior that is unacceptable, when in reality a person who cannot interact with people is

> On Jul 28, 2015, at 11:27, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > > On Jul 25, 2015, at 6:22 PM, Bob Marcan wrote: >> >> 1FuckingPrettyRose >> "Sorry, you must use no fewer than 20 total characters." >> 1FuckingPrettyRoseShovedUpYourAssIfYouDon'tGiveMeAccessRightFuckingNow! >> "Sorry, you cannot use punctuation."