search for: merely

This is rather bizarre: My TDM11 (one FXS) rings a $10 passive phone with REN of 1.0B, a cheap speaker phone of 0.3B, and a cordless phone with marked REN of 0.0B. But it couldn't properly ring this 27935GE3-B (FCC ID G9H2-7930) cordless phone rated at merely 0.1B. Rarely, the phone will crack out an occasional weak and abrupt beap, but never a normal ring. Otherwise Asterisk and TDM400P works with this phone, dialing, voice, callerID and all that. (In fact, when the FXS "rings", the display lights up as it should.) This is a dual-line 2.4...

Hello Everyone! Perhaps some of you have some advice for dealing with this problem? I've done quite a bit of googling on this one, but I can't find anything useful. Ever since I started using Samba as PDC, I have had this problem: when users merely open MS-Excel files on samba shares, the file's Last-Modification date is incremented to the current time. I have seen similar behavior with MS-Word files long ago when using WINNT4 as PDC, and it was caused by a macro-virus, but in this case, it doesn't seem to be virus-related. If th...

...y morning. This enforced write mode and group, to make absolutely sure everything works. Kit -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Eric Heintzberger [mailto:eric_e_heintzberger@yahoo.com] Verzonden: dinsdag 25 mei 2004 0:28 Aan: Terry L. Eleiott CC: samba@lists.samba.org Onderwerp: RE: [Samba] Merely Opening Excel Files Increments Last-Modificationdate on Samba Shares I have found the following regarding this problem: 1. It occurs only on files that (a) the user does not own AND (b) samba is forcing write permissions on (e.g. with the "force group" or "force create mode")....

...From: > samba-bounces+teleiott=tke-companies.com@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-bounces+teleiott=tke-companies.com@lists.samba.org] > On Behalf > Of Eric Heintzberger > Sent: Saturday, April 17, 2004 8:17 PM > To: RRuegner > Cc: samba@lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: [Samba] Merely Opening Excel Files > Increments > Last-Modificationdate on Samba Shares > > Thanks for the information. The problems and > solutions > you cite *are* related, I think, because I have > found > that my problem occurs only on Excel files that the > user does not own -- an...

All, I am having trouble with the getent passwd and getent group command. I am using 2.2.4-4 version of Samba on a redhat system with 2.4.18-SMP kernel. This issue seems to be intermittent. Sometimes is works and others it doesnt. More often than not, it failes. I can do a wbinfo -g and -u and get the info so I am connected to the doamin, but not getent. This will affect my users from loging

...instruction caches of some CPUs, but nowadays, memory caches are much bigger then they used to be, I have the prejudice it is just not a problem anymore. Maybe more of a concern might be the conditionals implementing vector recycling (already hidden in macros), as they may disrupt the speed of merely falling through linear code. One might probably do without jumps using clever masking operations, yet I wonder how far we would safely benchmark at configuration time to decide best code to generate, and how good C would be to write masked conditionals. I'm not familiar enough with moder...

...on with the machine password changing around. Who initiates this? nmbd? The PDC? Who's notified of this change, and what's going on there. Perhaps someone can shed some light? -- Nir Soffer -=- Software Engineer, Exanet Inc. -=- "Father, why are all the children weeping? / They are merely crying son O, are they merely crying, father? / Yes, true weeping is yet to come" -- Nick Cave and the Bad Seeds, The Weeping Song > -----Original Message----- > From: David Leuser II [mailto:dleuser@newhampton.org] > Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 4:28 PM > To: Ni...

Technically, it could've sent the mail before you even thought about writing it. Undefined is undefined, there are no requirements. From: Dustin Laurence Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 6:50 AM To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Is this a bug in clang? On 04/19/2011 10:50 PM, John Regehr wrote: > The compiler is perfectly within its rights to send a rude email to your >

...ts item #1813, was opened at 2005-04-20 23:48 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=412&aid=1813&group_id=85 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tom Copeland (tom) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: Merely a test Initial Comment: Hm, did this go to to win32utils-devel? Tom ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tom Copeland (tom) Date: 2005-04-20 23:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=102 Another test after manually subscribing "noreply@ruby...

...ead that does own the >> lock). However, it is not sensible to try and obtain a lock in >> nbd_close, as POSIX says that it is also undefined for any other >> thread to wait on a mutex that has already been destroyed. Therefore, >> we don't need to change our code, but merely remind users that >> nbd_close is not safe until all other uses of the handle have ceased. >> --- >> >> generator/generator | 3 ++- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/generator/generator b/generator/generator >> ind...

...what happens if > overflow happens (defined wrapping, defined saturating, or undefined > behavior), not *when* overflow happens. - Is undefined behavior meant to imply that if such condition were to occur, the undefined behavior will be warranted to not be expressed as it will be trapped; or merely assumed it won't occur and thereby may be optimized based on this assumption, regardless of the behavior which may actually be expressed in the absents of optimization if and when the condition occurred (and thereby optimizations may legitimately alter logical program behavior if sensitive to a...

...ecommends it for that purpose. And sometimes one just makes a typo. It has not been too uncommon for people to forget the `-officer' part of `security-officer@freebsd.org'. (Yours truly has been guilty of this.) Mistaken early disclosure of a vulnerability can have consequences from the merely embarrasing to catastrophic. Therefore, I am proposing that `security@freebsd.org' be re-routed to the Security Officer. I imagine this will have some significant impact: there must be many references to security@freebsd.org as a public list out there. So, I thought I'd air the issue here...

I have a general question regarding smb.conf and I was hoping that some of the rather more knowledgeable and experienced people here could please comment please? I am currently setting my various SAMBA systems up via some shell-scripts. Within these scripts, I remove the stock smb.conf shipped with Samba and replace this with an empty smb.conf file to which I add my own configuration options

...+ depends on (ARM64 || X86) >>>>> select IOMMU_API >>>>> + select IOMMU_DMA >>>> >>>> Can that have an "if X86" for clarity? AIUI it's not necessary for >>>> virtio-iommu itself (and really shouldn't be), but is merely to satisfy the >>>> x86 arch code's expectation that IOMMU drivers bring their own DMA ops, >>>> right? >>>> >>>> Robin. >>> >>> In fact does not this work on any platform now? >> >> There is ongoing work to use the g...

...+ depends on (ARM64 || X86) >>>>> select IOMMU_API >>>>> + select IOMMU_DMA >>>> >>>> Can that have an "if X86" for clarity? AIUI it's not necessary for >>>> virtio-iommu itself (and really shouldn't be), but is merely to satisfy the >>>> x86 arch code's expectation that IOMMU drivers bring their own DMA ops, >>>> right? >>>> >>>> Robin. >>> >>> In fact does not this work on any platform now? >> >> There is ongoing work to use the g...

> It's the evaluation of the expression "i++ + i++" that result in undefined > behavior. If you merely compile a program that contains the expression, the > expression is never evaluated. You need to execute the program to have the > expression be evaluated and behavior be undefined. I don't think this is correct. The standard does not make much of a distinction between compile time and...

Hi folks Can anyone direct me to a guide to analysing mixed models in R that is understandable by mere mortals (or worse, mere biologists)? I have read MASS and also Mick Crawley's book on the subject, have thrashed my way through the various help files from the NLME package and I'm afraid I remain baffled :-(. Particularly confusing is exactly what groupedData does, how I should use

...generating and running jitted code via the LLVM libraries: Imagine three functions fa, fb, fc where fa, and fc are generated and jitted with llvm. Function fb on the other hand has external C linkage and is statically compiled along with the llvm generating code into one executable. - fc merely executes an unwind. - fa uses invoke to call fb, passing its own arguments to it, which in turn calls fc. - At runtime fa is called (after jitting from a main(...) C routine), with a pointer to an ExecutionEngine instance, and a Function pointer to fc, both typed as Type::Int8Ty->getPointe...

...pts are plain text files, but need to be compiled for use.? I see that you can use seivec to compile scripts manually, which can help me create .dovecot.svbin which can be placed where needed and permissioned correctly.? But a couple questions: * Sieve has the concept of an active script - is this merely whatever is compiled into the .dovecot.svbin file? * Does dovecot (managesieve) do any other housekeeping when a user sieve script is installed and set as the active script?? I would need to replicate this manually. * If the default script is always the same (sorry, for us, the solution isn'...

Question... I do alot of stable upgrades and as a result I spend alot of time with mergemaster. My changes in etc are minimal, so I rather wipe out my existing /etc (except for machine specific files like fstab, and so on) and have mergemaster install everything from /usr/src/etc. This way I don't have to spend time going through all the diffs. I have found that there is no quick and