search for: mentionable

Dear lots of people, The first comments on the 3.7 release expressed surprise that there were no changes to the X86 or ARM targets. There had of course been a lot of hard work and many changes, but none of it was mentioned in the release notes. Please help make the release notes more comprehensive this time. The notes are of course not as important as the actual code, but they do get read, and

Dear everyone, It's time for the release notes nagging email. We have release notes for LLVM, Clang, clang-tools-extra, lld, and Polly. (If there are more, please let me know.) Most of these are pretty empty files; see e.g. the LLVM one at [1]. The internet does read these notes when we release, so please help make them informative! If you made any interesting changes during the past six

Dear everyone, The in-progress release notes for 3.7 [1,2] make it look like we didn't do very much over the past six months. Obviously that's not the case at all, so let's get them in shape! If you've been thinking "I should probably add this to the release notes at some point", now is the time :-) I have a list below of changes that might be worth mentioning. I

Some days back there was a mention about an open source image editor that people uses for application layout designing. I have forgotten about the name of that software. Can someone send me the link? Silvy Mathews

Hi, when reporting http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=5104 I spent quite a while trying to figure out what passes are used by "-O1" so that I could give this list to bugpoint. It turns out -debug-pass=Arguments is mentioned in docs/HowToSubmitABug.html but under a chapter titled "Compile-time optimization bugs" which I naively ignored since my bug was not a compile-time

> Hi, > > We have some problems while network booting thin clients. The type is T5540. > > At this moment we are using pxe linux 6.03. > > The systems are booting correctly with pxe linux version 6.03-pre14. > We have seen the same error with version 6.03-pre9. > > The error message: > > Failed to load ldlinux.c32 > Boot failed: press a key to retry, or

The problem I mentioned a day ago is now getting worse. message log: kernel: PCI Master abort kernel: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 00230004 kernel : printing eip c02060a6 kernel : Oops: 0002 kernel : CPU: 1 kernel : EIP: 0010:[<c02060a6>] Not tainted ,... Some register dumps kernel: Process asterisk (pid: 23917, stackpage=c5aff0000) kernel: Stack: numbers:)

Hi, We have some problems while network booting thin clients. The type is T5540. At this moment we are using pxe linux 6.03. The systems are booting correctly with pxe linux version 6.03-pre14. We have seen the same error with version 6.03-pre9. The error message: Failed to load ldlinux.c32 Boot failed: press a key to retry, or wait for reset... Any idea? Willem

Dear friends My domain users in two diffrent OU, one OU is TEMP_USERS and other OU is PEOPLE. What i should mention in smb.conf ? If i mention ldap user suffix = ou=PEOPLE, then users of ou TEMP_USERS is not able to authenticate. Please guide me. Thanks -- http://linuxinterviews.blogspot.com

There are some minor but significant differences between the FAQ and the User''s Manual.. 1.1. What is Xen? Xen is a virtual machine monitor (VMM) for x86-compatible computers. Xen can securely execute multiple virtual machines, each running its own OS, on a single physical system with close-to-native performance. However the User''s Manual (3.0) states: 1.3 Hardware Support

On 28/11/18 01:24, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 5:47 AM Toralf Lund <toralf.lund at pgs.com> wrote: >> I'm using CentOS 7 for development of software that is sometimes used on >> Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7. I conjunction with an update of one of the >> applications, I asked some Red Hat users to install the Qt 4 Assistant >> application via the

Here http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#requirements FreeBSD/amd64 isn't mentioned. It works quite fine for me. Also, it mentions that its known to work on Solaris/V9(Ultrasparc). Isn't this wrong since JIT isn't currently working on Sparc and is only expected to work with MC project completion? Sparc should me mentioned in the 'partial support' table. Also, I think

Hi, Looks like the memory_barrier intrinsic got removed in 3.0 and replaced with fence intrinsics. Could someone who understands this change better than me please update the 3.0 release notes? Also the LangRef still mentions llvm.memory.barrier but this is gone from 3.0. Best regards, --Edwin

Where are the patches mentioned in the bug report comments? The specific one I'm refering to is http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15323#c12. The comment mentions that it's attached, but I can't seem to access the attachment.

Hello, list,   I've been struggling with this task for a while looking for an efficient way to solve it: There are two variables 'price' and 'mentioned'. I want to 'enlarge' data so that missing price points within the price range are added to variable price. Also variable 'mentioned' is to receive values 0 in these cases. Note: Price points in original data can

Hi I am sorry, my question seems simple and must already have been asked, but I did not find any aswser on the archives :-( I am trying to use a plot in Sweave, where I include myself the statement <<results=tex,echo=FALSE>>= pdf("plot.pdf") plot(runif(100)) dev.off() cat("\\includegraphics{plot}\n\n") @ as is documented in the Sweave user guide A.9. The

To R-helpers, R offers the polyroot function for solving mentioned equations iteratively. However, Dr Math and Mathworld (and other places) show in detail how to solve mentioned equations non-iteratively. Do implementations for R that are non-iterative and that solve mentioned equations exists? Regards, Mads Jeppe

Hello, I would like to experiment with Xen some to see how I could integrate it in my various web application environments and hopefully make my life easier. I am currently using FreeBSD 6 but it seems that it doesn''t fully support Xen. I did some searching around and also notice some posts on mailing lists mentioning some trouble with the CentOS 4 distribution (something about the

Hi Folks, Now that LLVM 11.0.0 has been released, it's time to prepare for the final step envisionned in the previous RFC named *[RFC] Python 2 / Python 3 status* [0], ie. requiring Python3.6 for LLVM 12.0.0, to be released in 2021. At least Fedora already only ships Python3 and we didn't have much bugs reported wrt. Python compatibility for the LLVM toolchain. Indeed, all Python scripts

Hi there everybody, We''re having mongrel processes slowly die on us, with a segmentation fault. I''ve seen a few other people mention similar issues. Any info or suggestions would be nice: Error: /var/www/apps/heritage/current/config/../vendor/plugins/file_column/ lib/magick_file_column.rb:7: [BUG] Segmentation fault ruby 1.8.4 (2005-12-24) [i386-linux] Server: