search for: menioned

Hi all, I''m trying to set up traffic shaping and I''m having some difficulty. Here is what I want, and where I am. 1. HTTP and SMTP traffic needs to be priority 1. 2. All other traffic priority 2 3. Torrent traffic priority 3. My distro is Fedora Core 4, and the torrent protocol does not appear in /etc/protocols. The only protocol is TCP, which HTTP and SMTP is built on top

--=-mIogSkSG8HjWN56JSL46 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tom, If you have connection tracking enabled, then you have auto-magically ordered all packets to be defragged is that correct? I wonder if there is any noticible latency, especially in on-line games with defragging packets. Are there any ways to make an exception - to avoid tracking certain

I have FreeBSD-6.1 and it appears the default installation has a full complement of Kerberos5. But, /usr/src/kerberos5/README states: This subtree is world-exportable, as it does not contain any cryptographic code. At the time of writing, it did not even contain source code, only Makefiles and headers. Please maintain this "exportable" status quo. Thanks!

A bit off-topic question: has anyone any experiences with the relaying service that live365.com has? what kind of stream(s) do they relay? what is the protocol they use? --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request@xiph.org' containing only the word

Hi all, I've just been working with a piece of fortran code (Leo Breiman's random forest code) that needs a lot of arguments. When I use .Fortran, I get the message 'too many arguments in foreign function call'. Neither the help page for .Fortran (actually Foreign) nor "Writing R Extensions" explains how many arguments are too many. Looking at the code in

Hi all, I've just been working with a piece of fortran code (Leo Breiman's random forest code) that needs a lot of arguments. When I use .Fortran, I get the message 'too many arguments in foreign function call'. Neither the help page for .Fortran (actually Foreign) nor "Writing R Extensions" explains how many arguments are too many. Looking at the code in

...n. I will attempt an install of Clonezilla (testing) 2.2.1-22 via "manual" method, see what happens when I boot the resulting stick on my Gigabyte system, and then I'll post results here. Should be shortly. However I personally am still not hopeful, for the simple reason that, as I menioned earlier, I normally have a perfectly good 64GB SSD in the system in question (Gigabyte GA-M55Plus-S3G) and it is loaded up with Windows 7 and normally mounted into a simple/trivial sATA hot-swap bay. That works just fine. However when I remove that exact same SSD, drop it into an external USB 3.0...

Hi, Reward offered: 50$ (paypal), and I am sure this is a ridiculous thing I have missing. My goal: On a 2 NIC Asterisk box, to send packets that came in Asterisk on NIC1 back to NIC 1, and NIC2 back to NIC 2. (basically, send them back the same way they came from). I have been doing what was recommended to me and mangling packets left and right. I have reached a point where I am

In message <BLU0-SMTP557B92590B4CC34F8318088BB30 at phx.gbl>, Ady <ady-sf at hotmail.com> wrote: >Since in all cases you get to see at least the Syslinux copyright >message, the problem doesn't seem to be related to whether your BIOS >can identify the USB disk and boot from it. I can only agree. >Some GA motherboards might identify some USB drives as

copy d:\bugs.ps \\ouessant\lexmark after having deleted all the samba log files and restarted the SMBd daemon from the SWAT Web interface. This leads to the INTERNAL ERROR, see samba.oulx Now, to locate the problem, I tried the same kind of command on the same file, bugs.ps, but using the SMBCLIENT application from the Linux server itself, without changing anything, nor restarting the SMBd

Daniel R. Meigs wrote: > Thanks for your reply. The problem was having the computers in ou=Computers. > I put them in ou=People and the problem was solved. > > --Dan > Daniel: I deleted the following options from the smb.conf #ldap user suffix = ou=People #ldap machine suffix = ou=Computers But I left the options set in my smbldap.conf.

I am getting the following problem when I try to add new machines to the LDAP server. <snip> [2004/06/07 13:49:12, 2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:init_sam_from_ldap(462) init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: administrator [2004/06/07 13:49:13, 2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:init_group_from_ldap(1697) init_group_from_ldap: Entry found for group: 512 [2004/06/07 13:49:13, 2]