search for: memuses

...bout things there. I have found at least two examples which do not work out: 1) SU(2) Store "Value A" SU(1) Store "Value A" SU(0) Load "Value A" If MIsNeedChainEdge() returns false for SU(0) and SU(1), SU(0) is inserted into RejectedMemNodes and removed from its MemUses SU list, as this list is cleared. Therefore SU(2) must be handled with adjustChainDeps(), because it needs an edge from SU(0). For some reason adjustChainDeps() was only called for may-aliasing stores. I think this is wrong, as a store will clear the MemUses SU list also in the non-aliasing case....

Fix a little bug in virtio disk attributions Signed-off-by: Arthur Clement <aclement at linagora.com> --- src/task-omatic/task_vm.rb | 9 ++++++--- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/task-omatic/task_vm.rb b/src/task-omatic/task_vm.rb index 3a197f9..cf84ea2 100644 --- a/src/task-omatic/task_vm.rb +++ b/src/task-omatic/task_vm.rb @@ -66,7 +66,9 @@ def

I currently use following approach but its failing Find Max memory using following API         vdgiRet = virDomainGetInfo(domPtr, infoPtr);         memTotal = infoPtr->memory; Find current utilization using following API                 rVal = virDomainMemoryStats (domPtr, memStats, VIR_DOMAIN_MEMORY_STAT_NR, 0) ;         for (i = 0; i < rVal; i++)         {             if

I'm also running into an issue with llc. Alchemy is trying to use -march avm2 and other avm2 options, but: llc: for the -march option: : Cannot find option named 'avm2'! llc: Unknown command line argument '-avm2-use-memuser'. Try: 'llc --help' llc: Unknown command line argument '-avm2-package-name=cmodule'. Try: 'llc --help' Was avm2 support dropped?

From: Simon Courtois <scourtois at linagora.com> Signed-off-by: Simon Courtois <scourtois at linagora.com> --- src/app/controllers/vm_controller.rb | 19 ++++++++++++++++- src/app/views/vm/_form.rhtml | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++--- src/db/migrate/044_add_virtio_to_vm_and_nic.rb | 11 ++++++++++ src/public/stylesheets/components.css | 5

I am using LLVM via the Adobe Alchemy project. I'm trying to upgrade LLVM within Alchemy (its v2.1 of opt is crashing), but am running into an issue with llvm-ld. Alchemy is passing -O5 to llvm-ld, but it seems that -O params are no longer accepted by llvm-ld v2.4+ ("llvm-ld: Unknown command line argument '-O5'. Try: 'llvm-ld --help'"). Are -O optimizations

On 2009-07-22 22:14, Simmons, Aaron wrote: > > I’m also running into an issue with llc. Alchemy is trying to use > –march avm2 and other avm2 options, but: > > llc: for the -march option: : Cannot find option named 'avm2'! > > llc: Unknown command line argument '-avm2-use-memuser'. Try: 'llc > --help' > > llc: Unknown command line argument

Hi, all. Ubuntu host, attempting to get virsh working with VirtualBox... and failing. Here's what happens: root@foobox:~# virsh -c vbox:///session list error: failed to connect to the hypervisor error: internal error: unable to initialize VirtualBox driver API ------------------------------------------------------ Now, most of the docs I read about "failed to connect to the

hi, i'm writing a target dependent analysis on machine instruction level in llvm 2.0. the analysis needs to know if an inline assembly block reads from memory. the programmer is responsible to add 'm' constraints accordingly. i've seen the operand flags of the inline assembly SDNode and the machine instructions. but it seems that there is no difference between input and output

My apologies. I didn't realize that Adobe had branched llc. What about llvm-ld and -O? -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Török Edwin Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 13:41 To: LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] llvm-ld with -O params? On 2009-07-22 22:14, Simmons, Aaron wrote: > > I’m

...ame Value 'a', with different offsets: SU(2): store @a SU(1): store @a, Offset:1 SU(0): load @a In this case we have: * SU(1) does not need a dep against SU(0). Therefore,SU(0) ends up in RejectMemNodes and is removed from the mem-uses list (AliasMemUses or NonAliasMemUses), as this list is cleared. * SU(2) needs a dep against SU(0). Therefore, SU(2) must check RejectMemNodes by calling adjustChainDeps(). Previously, for store SUs, adjustChainDeps() was only called if MayAlias was true, missing the S(2) to S(0) dependency...

Is there a way I can prevent processes from taking up all the ram then swap until the box crashes/freezes? I'm using IEs4Linux and the wineserver seems to start taking up RAM until my box dies, it happens slowly. I am able to kill the sucker now, but I'd like to not have to worry about that. sar -r 01:00:01 PM kbmemfree kbmemused %memused kbbuffers kbcached kbswpfree kbswpused

...g to have two "stages" of dependency checking, first by mapping an SU to one or more Values, and then to still "check everything" that may have been missed. I would like to try to remove RejectMemNodes (and adjustChainDeps() and iterateChainSucc()) and then simply not clear the MemUses list (while handling a store). “If an SU gets a Value mapping, keep it”. If that list grows bigger than a certain limit, intelligent alias querying could stop, just as it stops now in iterateChainSucc when *Depth > 200. But it would then at least be done against the right set of SUs, not against...

Hello all. I have a centos 4.4 box (2.6.9-42.0.10.ELsmp) with 7gig of ram that doesn't seem to be using swap (also 7gig now). I say "seem" because I've noticed ram utilization run around 95% (with oracle and friends running) and then firing up a couple apps to use that last 5% will stop the machine dead in it's tracks. I ran across some reading[0] about

...SU(2): store @a > SU(1): store @a, Offset:1 > SU(0): load @a > > In this case we have: > > * SU(1) does not need a dep against SU(0). Therefore,SU(0) ends > up in > RejectMemNodes and is removed from the mem-uses list > (AliasMemUses > or NonAliasMemUses), as this list is cleared. > > * SU(2) needs a dep against SU(0). Therefore, SU(2) must check > RejectMemNodes by calling adjustChainDeps(). > > Previously, for store SUs, adjustChainDeps() was only called if > MayAlias was true, m...

On 2015-10-20 05:33, Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 03:57:39PM -0400, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote: >> Hi, all. Ubuntu host, attempting to get virsh working with >> VirtualBox... and failing. Here's what happens: >> >> root@foobox:~# virsh -c vbox:///session list >> error: failed to connect to the hypervisor >> error: internal error:

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 03:57:39PM -0400, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote: >Hi, all. Ubuntu host, attempting to get virsh working with >VirtualBox... and failing. Here's what happens: > >root@foobox:~# virsh -c vbox:///session list >error: failed to connect to the hypervisor >error: internal error: unable to initialize VirtualBox driver API > What version of VirtualBox do you

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:59:03AM -0400, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote: >On 2015-10-20 05:33, Martin Kletzander wrote: >>On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 03:57:39PM -0400, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote: >>>Hi, all. Ubuntu host, attempting to get virsh working with >>>VirtualBox... and failing. Here's what happens: >>> >>>root@foobox:~# virsh -c vbox:///session list

Guys, I've heard about some absurd RAM requirements for 9.1, has anybody tested it? e.g. http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=36314 -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/9-1-minimal-ram-requirements-tp5771583.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

There was no release since virtio support was introduced, so a proper migration is not necessary. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ochem <nicolas.ochem at gmail.com> --- src/app/controllers/vm_controller.rb | 6 ++- src/app/models/nic.rb | 2 + src/app/views/vm/_form.rhtml | 25 +++++++++------- src/db/migrate/046_add_model_to_nic.rb | 29 ++++++++++++++++++