search for: memorytesters

The attached patch prevents MappedMemoryTest.BasicWrite and MappedMemoryTest.MultipleWrite (both in unittests/Support/MemoryTest.cpp) from running if the correct protection flags for memory allocation are not set. Without this patch, the two tests fail when I run "make check-all" on a mips octeon board. The problem with the current code is that it allocates a block of memory without

Look good. -Andy From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Akira Hatanaka Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 1:33 PM To: LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: [LLVMdev] [PATCH][Review request] MappedMemoryTest: Prevent tests from running if read flag is not set. The attached patch prevents MappedMemoryTest.BasicWrite and

Dear R community, I'm running R 32 bits in a 64-bits machine (with 16Gb of Ram) using a PAE kernel, as you can see here: $ uname -a Linux mymachine 2.6.18-238.el5PAE #1 SMP Sun Dec 19 14:42:44 EST 2010 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux When I try to create a large matrix ( Q.obs <- matrix(NA, nrow=6940, ncol=9000) ), I got the following error: > Error: cannot allocate vector of size 238.3

...of a well equiped server, but if it works well it should earn it's keep pretty quick. It's called RAMCHECK, I priced out the DDR/DDR2 unit, but there is add-ons for SODIMM, SDRAM, EDO, if you got it fully loaded I suspect it would be around $5K. Company's called Innovations http://www.memorytesters.com/ They're Government registered and CDW seems to resell it, so it isn't completely suspect. -Ross ______________________________________________________________________ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain...

Hi All, We seem to have a strange problem with our NEC ML4 pcs. When using pxelinux to network boot, we are getting our menu (using menu.c32) when we choose a option the machine just locks up. If the option requires a password it shows the password box , I put in the password and then it locks up. But strangely the machine will boot from local disk which is an option on the boot menu. Our

Is anyone else concerned about the fact that rsync doesn't guarantee to produce identical file copies on the the target machine? Don't get me wrong in sounding critical because I think that rsync is a great example of how software should be written. (I often make the observation, as I learn more about Linux, and inevitably find myself comparing open source applications to Microsoft

llvm[4]: Compiling PoolAllocate.cpp for Release+Asserts build /home/NIKHILREDDY/WORK/LLVM_SRC/projects/poolalloc/lib/PoolAllocate/PoolAllocate.cpp: In member function ‘virtual bool llvm::PoolAllocate::runOnModule(llvm::Module&)’: /home/NIKHILREDDY/WORK/LLVM_SRC/projects/poolalloc/lib/PoolAllocate/PoolAllocate.cpp:403:16: error: ‘class llvm::Constant’ has no member named