Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "memcpy_element_atom".
Did you mean:
memcpy_element_atomic
2017 May 08
3
RFC: Element-atomic memory intrinsics
...y intrinsics. There are, as I can see it, a couple of ways to accomplish this. I’d like your opinions on which are preferable, or if you can think of any other options. In no particular order…
Option 1)
Introduce a new unordered/element-atomic version of each of the memory intrinsics.
Ex: @llvm.memcpy_element_atomic — work was already started to introduce this one in D27133, but could be backed out and restarted.
Intrinsic prototype: @llvm.memcpy_element_atomic.<overload desc>(<ty>* dest, <ty>* src, <ty> len, i32 align, i2 isunordered, i16 element_size)
Semantics:
* Will...
2017 May 08
2
RFC: Element-atomic memory intrinsics
...accomplish this.
>> I’d like your opinions on which are preferable, or if you can think of any
>> other options. In no particular order…
>>
>> Option 1)
>> Introduce a new unordered/element-atomic version of each of the memory
>> intrinsics.
>> Ex: @llvm.memcpy_element_atomic — work was already started to introduce
>> this one in D27133, but could be backed out and restarted.
>> Intrinsic prototype: @llvm.memcpy_element_atomic.<overload desc>(<ty>*
>> dest, <ty>* src, <ty> len, i32 align, i2 isunordered, i16 element_size)
>...
2016 Nov 11
2
RFC: Add atomic versions of the llvm.memcpy, llvm.memmove and llvm.memset intrinsics
Hi,
LLVM's memory intrinsics are quite useful for performing various optimizations
with frequently used memory operations. Unfortunately this intrinsics are not applicable for
languages with guaranteed atomicity for their memory accesses (like Java for example).
In order to overcome this limitation I'm thinking about adding set of intrinsics
which will execute as a series of unordered