search for: member3

Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "member3".

Did you mean: member
2018 Oct 25
0
Again NFSv4 and Kerberos at the 'samba way'...
...erbosity = 5' to idmap. The -vvv on nfs-comon or nfs-kernel-server.... Shows what happend with the connections, while connection. The idmap Verbose, if your mount was sucessfull, it shows the imapping logs. By example from my server. : An ls in /home/users ( as user root ) Oct 25 13:09:21 member3 nfsidmap[22443]: key: 0x2c4e3178 type: uid value: root at internal.example.tld timeout 600 Oct 25 13:09:21 member3 nfsidmap[22443]: nfs4_name_to_uid: calling nsswitch->name_to_uid Oct 25 13:09:21 member3 nfsidmap[22443]: nss_getpwnam: name 'root at internal.example.tld' domain 'inter...
2012 Dec 08
2
Queue joinempty, even after AddQueueMember
Hello, I add a member to a queue with AddQueueMember, but the Queue still indicates "joinempty" : Add member to queue : /-- Executing [queueadd at sub-GetParams:2] AddQueueMember("SIP/sip17-00005c1e", "myqueue11,member3") in new stack -- Executing [queueadd at sub-GetParams:3] NoOp("SIP/sip17-00005c1e", "AQMSTATUS = ADDED") in new stack/ ... but JOINEMPTY when entering the Call Queue : /-- Executing [queue at pbx-routing:4] Queue("SIP/SipIncoming-00005da9", "myqueue11,,,...
2016 Apr 25
2
Samba 4.2 domain member fails to access files
...domain controller, the other 3 are joined as domain members. Their configuration is practically identical. The PDC uses an smbpasswd backend. No winbindd. Trying to list e.g. a user's home directory (or any other dir with permissions 0700) works on all members but the 3rd: $ smbclient //member3/username -U username -W WORKGROUP Enter username's password: Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Windows 6.1] Server=[Samba 4.2.10-Debian] smb: \> ls NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED listing \* smb: \> quit When I open up a directory to e.g. 0777 I can create/upload a file which has the correct cr...
2016 Apr 25
0
Samba 4.2 domain member fails to access files
...are joined as domain members. Their > configuration is practically identical. The PDC uses an smbpasswd > backend. No winbindd. > > Trying to list e.g. a user's home directory (or any other dir with > permissions 0700) works on all members but the 3rd: > > $ smbclient //member3/username -U username -W WORKGROUP > Enter username's password: > Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Windows 6.1] Server=[Samba 4.2.10-Debian] > smb: \> ls > NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED listing \* > smb: \> quit > > When I open up a directory to e.g. 0777 I can create/u...
2018 Oct 24
5
Again NFSv4 and Kerberos at the 'samba way'...
Good morning Marco and others. > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Marco Gaiarin via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag 23 oktober 2018 18:58 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: [Samba] Again NFSv4 and Kerberos at the 'samba way'... > > > Sorry, i come back to this topic in a different thread,
2010 Jan 28
0
New feature in app_queue: Give members a penalty time for not answering (help testing)
...queue. I would be very happy if someone could help me test this feature, and report back to the issue tracker. To test this feature, patch an asterisk-trunk source tree, set notpresent-penalty to for example 30 seconds, set up a queue with three members: penalty, member 0, member1 0, member2 1, member3 Then call into the queue, and the queue calls member1, either take the call, or neglect to answer it. He should now be unavailable for the next 30 seconds. When the other members phone rings (member2), neglect to answer this phone too. Now both agents in penalty level 0 should be unavailable, and...
2015 Apr 09
1
samba member logon.. question.
...nux and windows users, nfs-kerberos connected with member1. member5 = webserver server with linux and windows users, nfs-kerberos connected with member1. ( no external web server only internal ) RID backend: member2 = profiles and user folders. windows only users and linux administrator user. member3 = print server. windows users only for printing and linux administrator user. This way when you create a user and you forget to set a uid, a windows user can always login and policies are always set because of the generated uids. yes, access is denied to member1 thats ok, when a uid is forgotten...
2013 Jan 22
2
[LLVMdev] LLD vs LLVM coding style...
...uctors (other than don't have static constructors). > Yes, but there is a desire for consistency and uniformity throughout the code. There are 13 constructors with initializer lists formatted using the leading-comma style LLD uses heavily: Foo::Foo(...) : member(...) , member2(...) , member3(...) { } That is in a very small minority. I'd like to not have different formats for such things as it waste's developers time writing them. clang-format does a very nice job already of formatting initializer lists, and it is reasonable consistent with LLVM and Clang's codebases, so p...
2013 Jan 22
0
[LLVMdev] LLD vs LLVM coding style...
On Jan 20, 2013, at 10:18 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > Sorry, I wasn't trying to suggest anything vague, but rather refer to my previous (perhaps ill founded) understanding about the expected path forward for LLD. Anyways, I'll explain in a bit more detail so we can talk about the concrete issue. > > My concrete hope is that LLD migrates toward the coding standards that are
2015 Apr 09
4
samba member logon.. question.
Hai all,? ? I was testing with a member server and i had a small problem. I found the solution but im just asking why??? Situation. DC + Member server, all is working fine. All test ok. with AD backend ! ? Now i did set some GPO's and i created a user to test.??Tested wbinfo -u worked ok, id user did not work.. but i ignored that. Now im logging in and my pc was complaining the user and
2013 Jan 21
4
[LLVMdev] LLD vs LLVM coding style...
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Nick Kledzik <kledzik at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jan 19, 2013, at 1:55 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > > We're looking more at doing some serious hacking on LLD, and I'd like to > avoid doing lots of work in the codebase only to change the style around > later. > > > > My understanding was that LLD was always intended to