search for: mem_sw

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "mem_sw".

Did you mean: mem_sp
2007 Aug 07
1
Attempting to shrink speex: Are these functions necessary?
...e shrunk considerably, however I do not know the minimum values that I would set the static arrays to be. I hate to be a bother but could you tell me the minimum values for these arrays/structures in the state structure? Thanks! encode: stack winBuf excBuf swBuf lagWindow old_lsp old_qlsp mem_sp mem_sw mem_sw_whole mem_exc mem_exc2 pi_gain pitch decode: stack excBuf interp_qlpc old_qlsp mem_sp pi_gain >>> Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> 08/06/07 7:04 PM >>> Last thing. All the codebooks are stored as tables of char, so you're probably wasting a lot...
2007 Aug 07
0
Attempting to shrink speex: Are these functions necessary?
...I do not know the minimum values that I would set the static > arrays to be. I hate to be a bother but could you tell me the > minimum values for these arrays/structures in the state structure? > Thanks! > > encode: stack winBuf excBuf swBuf lagWindow old_lsp old_qlsp mem_sp > mem_sw mem_sw_whole mem_exc mem_exc2 pi_gain pitch > > decode: stack excBuf interp_qlpc old_qlsp mem_sp pi_gain What I meant is that you can reduce the stack part (assuming you're not already using VAR_ARRAYS or USE_ALLOCA). The other variables above still require the same size they are curren...
2005 May 25
3
Speex on TI C6x, Problem with TI C5x Patch
...t)); st->interp_qlsp = speex_alloc((st->lpcSize)*sizeof(spx_lsp_t)); st->first = 1; for (i=0;i<st->lpcSize;i++) { st->lsp[i]=LSP_SCALING*(M_PI*((float)(i+1)))/(st->lpcSize+1); } st->mem_sp = speex_alloc((st->lpcSize)*sizeof(spx_mem_t)); st->mem_sw = speex_alloc((st->lpcSize)*sizeof(spx_mem_t)); st->mem_sw_whole = speex_alloc((st->lpcSize)*sizeof(spx_mem_t)); st->mem_exc = speex_alloc((st->lpcSize)*sizeof(spx_mem_t)); st->pi_gain = speex_alloc((st->nbSubframes)*sizeof(spx_word32_t)); st->pitch = speex_all...