search for: mellanox

...> > > > And move mlx5_core module name to general include, so auxiliary drivers > > will be able to use it as a basis for a name in their device ID tables. > > > > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro at nvidia.com> > > --- > > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/devlink.c | 2 +- > > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_ethtool.c | 4 +--- > > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.c | 1 - > > .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/ipoib/ethtool.c | 2 +- > > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/c...

...rivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/counters.c | 7 - drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/ib_rep.c | 113 ++-- drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/ib_rep.h | 45 +- drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c | 148 +++-- drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mlx5_ib.h | 4 +- .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/dev.c | 567 ++++++++++++------ .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/devlink.c | 4 +- .../ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_ethtool.c | 4 +- .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c | 135 ++--- .../net/ethernet/mellanox/m...

...hed .config to linux build tree COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=arm64 If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp at intel.com> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/platform/mellanox/mlxbf-tmfifo.c: In function 'mlxbf_tmfifo_probe': drivers/platform/mellanox/mlxbf-tmfifo.c:1237:70: warning: value computed is not used [-Wunused-value] 1237 | #define MLXBF_TMFIFO_LITTLE_ENDIAN (virtio_legacy_is_little_endian() || \ | ~~~...

...all flower skip_sw l2_miss true action drop Error: mlxsw_spectrum: Can't match on "l2_miss". We have an error talking to the kernel Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch at nvidia.com> --- .../net/ethernet/marvell/prestera/prestera_flower.c | 6 ++++++ drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c | 6 ++++++ drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_flower.c | 6 ++++++ drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_flower.c | 10 ++++++++++ 4 files changed, 28 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/prestera/prestera_flower.c b/drivers/net/eth...

...# save the attached .config to linux build tree GCC_VERSION=7.5.0 make.cross ARCH=sparc64 If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp at intel.com> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_netdev.c:50:0: drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_netdev.c: In function 'mlx4_en_tx_timeout': >> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_netdev.c:1376:12: error: 'tx_ring' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'en_print'? txqueue, tx_r...

Hello, I am having trouble installing the server modules for lustre 2.1.4 and use mellanox''s OFED distribution so we may use infiniband. Would you folks look at my procedure and results below and let me know what you think? Thanks very much! The mellanox ofed installation builds and installs some kernel modules too, so I used this method to ensure OFED compiled against the co...

Greetings Xen user community, I am interested in using Mellanox ConnectX cards with SR-IOV capabilities to passthrough pci-e Virtual Functions (VFs) to Xen guests. The hope is to allow for the use of InfiniBand directly within virtual machines and thereby enable a plethora of high performance computing applications that already leverage InfiniBand interconnects...

...agreed upon? Hmm I don't know. I recall a similar discussion around VHOST_IOTLB. That's different ... I see [linux]$ git grep MLX5_CORE|grep depends drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/Kconfig: depends on NETDEVICES && ETHERNET && PCI && MLX5_CORE drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/Kconfig: depends on MLX5_CORE drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/Kconfig: depends on NETDEVICES && ETHERNET && INET && PCI && MLX5_CORE drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/Kconfig: depends on MLX5_CORE_EN && RFS_ACCEL d...

...hed .config to linux build tree COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=arm64 If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp at intel.com> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/platform/mellanox/mlxbf-tmfifo.c: In function 'mlxbf_tmfifo_probe': >> drivers/platform/mellanox/mlxbf-tmfifo.c:1237:2: error: invalid preprocessing directive #defined; did you mean #define? 1237 | #defined MLXBF_TMFIFO_LITTLE_ENDIAN (virtio_legacy_is_little_endian() || | ^~~~~~~...

...ndication net/sched: flower: Allow matching on layer 2 miss flow_offload: Reject matching on layer 2 miss mlxsw: spectrum_flower: Add ability to match on layer 2 miss selftests: forwarding: Add layer 2 miss test cases .../marvell/prestera/prestera_flower.c | 6 + .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c | 6 + .../mellanox/mlxsw/core_acl_flex_keys.c | 1 + .../mellanox/mlxsw/core_acl_flex_keys.h | 3 +- .../mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_acl_flex_keys.c | 5 + .../ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_flower.c | 16 + drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_flower.c |...

...ndication net/sched: flower: Allow matching on layer 2 miss flow_offload: Reject matching on layer 2 miss mlxsw: spectrum_flower: Add ability to match on layer 2 miss selftests: forwarding: Add layer 2 miss test cases .../marvell/prestera/prestera_flower.c | 6 + .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c | 6 + .../mellanox/mlxsw/core_acl_flex_keys.c | 1 + .../mellanox/mlxsw/core_acl_flex_keys.h | 3 +- .../mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_acl_flex_keys.c | 5 + .../ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_flower.c | 16 + drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_flower.c |...

...up patches, but none of the bugs fixed are severe regressions on common configs (e.g. compiler warnings, lockdep/rt errors, or bugs in new drivers). So I thought it's more important to preserve the credit for the fixes. I had to pull 5 patches from git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mellanox/linux mlx5-next to get the mlx5 things to work, this seems to be how mellanox guys are always managing things, and they told me they are ok with it. The following changes since commit bcf876870b95592b52519ed4aafcf9d95999bc9c: Linux 5.8 (2020-08-02 14:21:45 -0700) are available in the Git repos...

Hi all, Has anyone installed mellanox ofed on linux kernel 3.x? Regards

On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 04:01:58PM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 08:48:52AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > > Did you merge this?: > > > git pull git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mellanox/linux.git mlx5-next > > > > > > I can only merge this tree if no one else will. Linus does not like > > getting same patches through two trees. > > > > Is this the case? Is mlx5-next going to be merged through > > my tree in this cycle? > > >...

On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 04:01:58PM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 08:48:52AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > > Did you merge this?: > > > git pull git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mellanox/linux.git mlx5-next > > > > > > I can only merge this tree if no one else will. Linus does not like > > getting same patches through two trees. > > > > Is this the case? Is mlx5-next going to be merged through > > my tree in this cycle? > > >...

Hi All, We looking for suggestions on dealing with mellanox drivers in CentOS 6.7 We tried installing mellanox drivers (MLNX_OFED_LINUX-3.2-2.0.0.0-rhel6.7-x86_64) on a Quanta Cirrascale server running Centos 6.7 - 2.6.32-573.22.1.el6.x86_64. When we rebooted the machine after installing the drivers, it went into a kernel panic for every installed ker...

On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 09:05:29AM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > Hi Michael, > please note that this series depends on mlx5 core device driver patches > in mlx5-next branch in > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mellanox/linux.git. > git pull git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mellanox/linux.git mlx5-next > > They also depend Jason Wang's patches submitted a couple of weeks ago. > > vdpa_sim: use the batching API > vhost-vdpa: support batch updating Hmm this makes merging them m...

...Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 07:20:36PM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: >>> Hi Michael, >>> please note that this series depends on mlx5 core device driver patches >>> in mlx5-next branch in >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mellanox/linux.git. >> Thanks! OK so what's the plan for merging this? >> Do patches at least build well enough that I can push them >> upstream? Or do they have to go on top of the mellanox tree? >> > The patches are built on your linux-next branch which I updated > yester...

On 2020/8/5 ??12:20, Eli Cohen wrote: > Hi Michael, > please note that this series depends on mlx5 core device driver patches > in mlx5-next branch in > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mellanox/linux.git. > > git pull git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mellanox/linux.git mlx5-next > > They also depend Jason Wang's patches:https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/7/1/301 > > Jason, I had to resolve some conflicts so I would appreciate of you can verify > that it is ok...

...ael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 04:01:58PM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 08:48:52AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > Did you merge this?: > > > > git pull > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mellanox/linux.gi > > > > t mlx5-next > > > > > > I can only merge this tree if no one else will. Linus does not > > > like > > > getting same patches through two trees. > > > > > > Is this the case? Is mlx5-next going to be merged through...