search for: mehid

...uplicate the >> information in every module. >> >> David >> >> Yes we do have edge profile cout, but in order to compare it with global > couts we need Profile Summary as you said. > > > Can you explain a bit more the issue here? > > Thanks, > > Mehid > > > If we will follow 2) then we won't have to duplicate the data. > > >> > >> > I like the 2. much more. It will reduce the summary size slightly and I >> > don't think we will need ProfileCount anywhere else. >> > >> > The othe...

...orking on it. I likely won't have the bandwidth to mentor another person, but of course am happy to give pointers and advice, review patches, etc. Teresa On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 6:23 AM, Piotr Padlewski <piotr.padlewski at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Jhonny, > Thanks for the interest, Mehid (cc) with Teresa (cc) are probably the best > people to ask about this project. > I am not sure what exactly the project contain, but if it contains > propagating of attributes, I would focus on the understanding of parameters > and functions attributes in LLVM (http://llvm.org/docs/Lan...

Good evening. I got interested in helping with ThinLTO, I did watch this video, https://youtu.be/9OIEZAj243g and i found it very interesting. I got C++ knowledge, but not a lot of llvm/clang source knowledge... Also, there is no mentors related in the website for this project. Would the community be so kind in giving me information on how to help? I have started reading the documentation on the

2016-09-02 15:04 GMT-07:00 Xinliang David Li <davidxl at google.com>: > On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Piotr Padlewski > <piotr.padlewski at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I am working right now on importing based on PGO/FDO data. There is one > > issue that I found - when we calculate the list of imports, we can't get > the > > ProfileSummaryInfo,

...ibrary has a separate mailing-list? Why? > > Because the topic is very separate. Can you clarify? I thought is was about the development/debug/evolution/usability of http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Fuzzer/ <http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Fuzzer/> — Mehid > > > — > Mehdi > > >> >> I can reproduce this too, but if i either increase FUZZER_TESTING_SECONDS to 600 or change seed=1 to seed=2 the problem is gone. >> Looks like one of the binaries got simply unlucky with a particular seed. >> You can o...

It has also submodules. https://github.com/llvm-project/llvm-project-submodule Both llvm-project(-tree) and (-submodule) have refs/notes/commits. On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 1:13 AM Renato Golin via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 27 June 2016 at 17:03, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> > wrote: > > I think that trying to create a

The configuration we’re mentioning is a 2-stage bootstrap: You need first to build without LTO your own clang, and then use it for the LTO build. — Mehid > On Sep 20, 2016, at 10:17 AM, Michael Kruse <llvmdev at meinersbur.de> wrote: > > I am the author of Polly's/ISL's platform tests and could reproduce > the problem on my system with this error message: > > /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/llvm-3.8/bin/../lib/LLVMgold.so:...

On 27 June 2016 at 17:03, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > I think that trying to create a ordering/rev number between independent git > repositories is fundamentally unreliable. > > If we want to keep llvm and clang in lock step we should probably probably > just have them in the same repository like > https://github.com/llvm-project/llvm-project.

> On Sep 21, 2016, at 9:36 AM, Kostya Serebryany via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Exciting! > > (btw, I'd prefer libfuzzer at googlegroups.com <mailto:libfuzzer at googlegroups.com> for such discussions, please start new topics there) You mean a LLVM library has a separate mailing-list? Why? — Mehdi > > I can reproduce this too, but

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:54 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > Can you look for the specific errors in the CMake log and error files? > > CMake is very good at not presenting the real issue… > Here it is trying to build very simple programs to check features > availability. Like: > > #include <strings.h> > int main() { ffs(0); return 0;