search for: medata

Hi, I'm a newbie.Sorry for my question. I have RH9 & downloaded rpm of dovecot for RH9. I installed it: rpm -ivh nameOfthatrpm & when i ran #service dovecot start ,I recieved following lines: Starting IMAP daemon (dovecot): Fatal: Can't use SSL certificate /usr/share/ssl/certs/dovecot.pem: No such file or directory

Hi , I recently installed Fedora Core 1. Installed postfix on it and that is running fine. I am trying to get dovecot to run and I have changed only the following line from the default dovecot.conf : imap_listen = 127.0.0.1 since I'd like to install squirrelmail later on. Now when I try to start dovecot I get "Starting Dovecot Imap: Fatal: Can't resolve address

Hello there, We want to move from UW-IMAP to Dovecot (mbox format), works like a charm, but UW-IMAP has that bloody habbit to make a stupid message in all his mailbox files : From MAILER-DAEMON Thu Apr 19 10:30:01 2001 Date: 19 Apr 2001 10:30:01 +0200 From: Mail System Internal Data <MAILER-DAEMON at mailhub2-vil.isdnet.net> Subject: DON'T DELETE THIS MESSAGE -- FOLDER INTERNAL DATA

...oes so upon exit. I've reproduced it in 0.99.10-6 (fedora core 1) and 0.99.10.4-1 (fedora devel) versions. I filed a Bugzilla report at bugzilla.redhat.com under 114230 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114230). -Rick -- Rick Johnson, RHCE #807302311706007 - rjohnson at medata.com Linux/Network Administrator - Medata, Inc. (from home) PGP Public Key: https://mail.medata.com/pgp/rjohnson.asc

Hi everybody. I downloaded RPM of dovecot for RH9. & i installed it with "rpm -ivh ThatFILE.rpm" then i ran "service dovecot start" & i receiving following lines: Starting IMAP daemon (dovecot): Fatal: Can't use SSL certificate /usr/share/ssl/certs/dovecot.pem: No such file or directory [FAILED] Then i go

I have read and read the dovecot docs on maildir folders and think that this is what I want. However, the MUA programs that I use, SylpheedClaws, Evolution, Mozilla seem to react differently to how I setup the folders. Is there a good FAQ on this subject somewhere? I think that I want to setup a virtual domain and am looking for documents. Alex

Hello, I'm in the process to choose between Courier and Dovecot. I would like to know if it's possible to configure Dovecot in order to use multiple user database (e.g. ldap+passwd) in order to have both virtual user authenticated by LDAP and system user authenticated by system password and with their own home directory. Another question: at http://dovecot.org/doc/dovecot-example.conf

Hi all! I have a strange problem with Dovecot - deleted messages never seem to get deleted on the server! Deleted messages just seem to get a 'T' at the end of them on the server and remain there, so user mail boxes continue to grow to incredible sizes. Is this a setting I must change somewhere? Must I delete these files manually? Leslie

Sorry if this question has been asked before I looked through some of the archives before posting this. I am considering using dovecot on a small 35 user enviorment (only around 6 gigs of email) that will be primarly be used with squirrelmail for the MUA. I have been using dovecot for a few weeks now and really like it. It is a big improvement over uw-imap thats for sure. I was wondering how many

Hi, I have tried to use the same Maildir dovecot uses with another program and encountered the problem that Dovecot seems to move files from new to cur in maildir-sync.c::maildir_scan_dir without adding an info part. On the page http://cr.yp.to/proto/maildir.html is written that mails have to be renamed to uniq:info when moved to the cur directory. Could this be a bug in dovecot? --

Hi! I'm currently running RH 9 with postfix, uw-imap and MailScanner. I want to install Fedora Core 2 (when it comes out next week) with postfix, dovecot and amavisd. I'm unhappy with the problems I'm having with MailScanner, with the difficulty I've had with authentication as I am currently configured, and want to move to Maildir instead of mbox. That being said, is dovecot

--On Thursday, January 29, 2004 11:16 PM +0200 Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > I don't yet really even want Dovecot to be too well known, it's not > ready yet. When 1.0 comes (this spring I hope) I'll start publicizing it > more. After that I should only need to add new features - existing ones > should be perfect and better than anyone else's ;) Just a

Trying to crank it up on our RedHat 8.0 system... I get the following.. I am sure it is something simple in the config.. just don't know what... Any help would be greatly appreciated.. Here is from the log.. If there is a way to get more log info that might help he as well.. Jan 29 14:30:34 smtp dovecot: Dovecot starting up Jan 29 14:30:34 smtp dovecot: dovecot startup succeeded Jan 29

Hi, We are thinking of converting to Dovecot to lighten our I/O load. I have done some performace tests comparing UW-IMAP to Dovecot when using mbox format if anyone is interested. They primarily examine the I/O improvements that can be gained from using Dovecot over UW when staying with mbox format: http://whizzo.uoregon.edu/public/src/mailperf/results.html I had too much cached for this set

.... One can either add another module flag for "Named Libraries" in addition to "Linker Options", which might be easier to implement. Or one can provide a target-specific hook to the frontend, which converts #pragma comment(lib, "blah.lib") to something like this: !0 = medata !{ i32 6, "Linker Options", metadata !{ !metadata { metadata !"/DEFAULTLIB:blah.lib" } } } !llvm.module.flags = !{ !0 } Your example is maybe more complicated where you need to convert libz to "-lz". Regarding the ordering information of the libraries, I thin...

2017-04-01 15:59 GMT+02:00 Piotr Padlewski <piotr.padlewski at gmail.com>: > > > 2017-03-31 23:20 GMT+02:00 Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com>: > >> Hi Piotr, >> >> On March 31, 2017 at 1:07:12 PM, Piotr Padlewski >> (piotr.padlewski at gmail.com) wrote: >> > [snip] >> > Do I understand it correctly, that it is legal to

...data > only once - > so read cache is not of much use (except if it is a magic > one, > pre-reading guessed future-request addresses). > > So my idea would be to disbale the device read-ahead for > the Oracle > ZVOLS / folders by setting "primarycache" to "medata" and > thus using the > pressious main memory for metadata only (ZFS does a lot of > metadata > operastions, so having this in memory helps). If this does > not help, > secondarycache to "metadata" may be a good idea also. > > Maybe this helps, > Robert...

...e frontend, which converts #pragma comment(lib, > "blah.lib") to something like this: > I would vote that we have a target hook that lets us emit the code into the "Linker Options" metadata, which would also be our handling of #pragma comment(linker, ...) > > !0 = medata !{ i32 6, "Linker Options", > metadata !{ > !metadata { metadata !"/DEFAULTLIB:blah.lib" } > } > } > !llvm.module.flags = !{ !0 } > > Your example is maybe more complicated where you need to convert libz to > "-lz". > > Regarding t...

Hi all, We plan to add some auto-linking support for Mach-O, and need a scheme for encoding this information in the LLVM IR. We would like the same scheme to be able to support Microsoft's #pragma comment(lib,...) and #pragma comment(library, ...) features eventually. The current proposal is as follows: -- #1. Extend module-level metadata flags (llvm.module.flags) to support two new