search for: me

...to to setup the domain controller in a chroot and have the >> file server run under regular root? >> >> Would it be better to setup a VM for the domain controller and have file >> server run on the main OS or vice-versa? >> > to run two Samba instances on the same host, you can create a NIC alias > with an additional IP address and bind the Samba DC to one IP and the > file server to the second. Of course you need two separate smb.conf > files and configure individual database directories. And then start the > daemons with the "-c" para...

...ance being the domain controller and serving files >> as the 3.x server is able to do? >> > > You can already do this. > --- The 4.x server will serve files as well or better than the 3.6.x servers? > >> I have been waiting for the 4.x server to become a full server >> before upgrading from 3.6.22, but it is getting a bit long in the >> tooth. The requirement that in upgrading to 4.x I'll still need to run >> a 3.6 server made the upgrade seem like alot of work for little gain >> (I only have a few users and most of th...

...ts.samba.org> wrote: > Is there a target date for when the 4.x server will be able to > support 1 samba instance being the domain controller and serving files > as the 3.x server is able to do? You can already do this. > > I have been waiting for the 4.x server to become a full server > before upgrading from 3.6.22, but it is getting a bit long in the > tooth. The requirement that in upgrading to 4.x I'll still need to run > a 3.6 server made the upgrade seem like alot of work for little gain > (I only have a few users and most of them are "vir...

Hi, I tried to launch Windows ME's ftp.exe with wineconsole. Command line was : wineconsole --winver=winme ftp In result my system hangs, found in /var/log/messages : snoop kernel: Out of Memory: Killed process 14041 (wineconsole). Strange, because I have no problem running ftp without wineconsole. I have sufficient memory (2...

Hello All, Having some trouble connecting to my Windows domain with my Solaris server. Some details included below that might give you an idea of what is going on here. I have tried setting allow weak crypto in the krb5.conf, I have tried specifying the encryption types and leaving it blank to use the defaults all to no...

From: J?r?me Glisse <jglisse at redhat.com> For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeholde...

On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 09:25:13PM -0700, john.hubbard at gmail.com wrote: > From: J?r?me Glisse <jglisse at redhat.com> > > For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages > via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page(). > > This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d > ("mm: introduc...

From: John Hubbard <jhubbard at nvidia.com> Hi, This is mostly Jerome's work, converting the block/bio and related areas to call put_user_page*() instead of put_page(). Because I've changed Jerome's patches, in some cases significantly, I'd like to get his feedback before we actually leave him listed as the author (he might want to disown some or all...

From: John Hubbard <jhubbard at nvidia.com> Hi, This is mostly Jerome's work, converting the block/bio and related areas to call put_user_page*() instead of put_page(). Because I've changed Jerome's patches, in some cases significantly, I'd like to get his feedback before we actually leave him listed as the author (he might want to disown some or all...

...a instance being the domain controller and serving > >> files as the 3.x server is able to do? > >> > > > > You can already do this. > > > --- > The 4.x server will serve files as well or better > than the 3.6.x servers? It should work the same, after all, it is using the same code. > > > > >> I have been waiting for the 4.x server to become a full server > >> before upgrading from 3.6.22, but it is getting a bit long in the > >> tooth. The requirement that in upgrading to 4.x I'll still ne...

I understand from the wiki that I shouldn't have the domain controller also be the file server. Is it possible to to setup the domain controller in a chroot and have the file server run under regular root? Would it be better to setup a VM for the domain controller and have file server run on the main OS or vice-versa? Regards, John

Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Wed, 09 Nov 2016 15:20:41 -0800 > Linda W <samba at tlinx.org> wrote: > >>> >>> >>>> I have been waiting for the 4.x server to become a full server >>>> before upgrading from 3.6.22, but it is getting a bit long in the >>>> tooth. The requirement that in upgrading to 4.x I'll still need to >>>> run a 3.6 server made the upgrade seem like alot of work for >>>> little gain (I only...