search for: mdx

...s this depends on how exactly the system is configured. >> > If you can the new disks while the original 2 disks are still available then grow, add, wait, fail, remove, shrink. That way you will never loose redundancy... > > # grow and add new disk > > mdadm --grow -n 3 /dev/mdX -a /dev/... > > # wait for rebuild of the array > > mdadm --wait /dev/mdX > > # fail old disk > > mdadm --fail /dev/sdY > > # remove old disk > > mdadm /dev/mdX --remove /dev/sdY > > # add second disk > > mdadm /dev/mdX --add /dev/... > &...

On 11/23/20 10:46 AM, Simon Matter wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I want to replace my hard drives based SW RAID-1 with SSD's. >> >> What would be the recommended procedure? Can I just remove one drive, >> replace with SSD and rebuild, then repeat with the other drive? > > I suggest to "mdadm --fail" one drive, then "mdadm --remove" it.

The guestfs_canonical_device_name API was rewriting /dev/mdX as /dev/sdX. This is wrong since (eg) /dev/sd0 is not a device name, so if you pass the canonicalized name back to the API it will fail. virt-v2v was one tool doing this. --- src/canonical-name.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/src/canonical-name.c b/src/canonical-name.c index...

...boot loader. I >> guess this depends on how exactly the system is configured. > If you can the new disks while the original 2 disks are still available then grow, add, wait, fail, remove, shrink. That way you will never loose redundancy... # grow and add new disk mdadm --grow -n 3 /dev/mdX -a /dev/... # wait for rebuild of the array mdadm --wait /dev/mdX # fail old disk mdadm --fail /dev/sdY # remove old disk mdadm /dev/mdX? --remove /dev/sdY # add second disk mdadm /dev/mdX --add /dev/... # wait mdadm --wait /dev/mdX # fail and remove old disk mdadm --fail /dev/sdZ mdad...

...epends on how exactly the system is configured. >> If you can the new disks while the original 2 disks are still available then grow, add, wait, fail, remove, shrink. That way you will never loose redundancy... >> >> # grow and add new disk >> >> mdadm --grow -n 3 /dev/mdX -a /dev/... >> >> # wait for rebuild of the array >> >> mdadm --wait /dev/mdX >> >> # fail old disk >> >> mdadm --fail /dev/sdY >> >> # remove old disk >> >> mdadm /dev/mdX --remove /dev/sdY >> >> # add second disk...

Hello! We have application written in Borland Delphi, with BDE 5 (unfortunately, I have no sources :-( ) It creates mdx files on samba share. All is OK with w2k or win98, but with Win ME programs says that file is busy, when it tries to create mdx (index ) file. If it says that file is busy it is impossible to create this file from another machine with w2k or win98- program says that file is busy too. Log file w...

...d0 till /dev/md5. I think I know what to do based on mdadm man page and this list's archives but there is no harm in confirming right? ;) From this post http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2006-April/063076.html I plan on removing the old partitions from the array like this..... mdadm /dev/mdx -r /dev/hdax. Then I will shut down the server, replace the hard drive, make the server boot from second IDE drive and hopefully boot into Centos. From there do I have to manually create each /dev/mdx partition and then re-add them like this....mdadm /dev/mdx -a /dev/hdax ? That is what I am not su...

Hi, This is my current config: /dev/md0 -> 200 MB -> sda1 + sdd1 -> /boot /dev/md1 -> 36 GB -> sda2 + sdd2 -> form VolGroup00 with md2 /dev/md2 -> 18 GB -> sdb1 + sde1 -> form VolGroup00 with md1 sda,sdd -> 36 GB 10k SCSI HDDs sdb,sde -> 18 GB 10k SCSI HDDs I have added 2 36 GB 10K SCSI drives in it, they are detected as sdc and sdf. What should I do if I

CentOS 6.3, x86_64. I have noticed when building a new software RAID-6 array on CentOS 6.3 that the mismatch_cnt grows monotonically while the array is building: # cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] md11 : active raid6 sdg[5] sdf[4] sde[3] sdd[2] sdc[1] sdb[0] 3904890880 blocks super 1.2 level 6, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 [6/6] [UUUUUU]

.../dev/md2 --level=0 --raid-devices=2 /dev/sdb3 /dev/sdc3 then I did a lsblk and realized that I used --level=0 instead of --level=1 (spelling mistake) The SIZE was reported double as I created a striped set by mistake, yet I wanted the mirrored. Here starts my problem, I cannot get rid of the /dev/mdX no matter what I do (try to do). I tried to delete the MDX, I removed the disks by failing them, then removing each array md0, md1 and md2. I also did dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdX bs=512 seek=$(($(blockdev --getsz /dev/sdX)-1024)) count=1024 dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdX bs=512 count=1024 mdad...

...on support (usually extracted from an transaction processing system) Direct connection to Microsoft OLAP server ("Analysis Services") requires and OLE DB provider rather than an ODBC connection -- so RODBC cannot be used directly (querying an OLAP cube rather than a SQL table requires MDX instead of SQL queries). One way to use RODBC to query MS OLAP cube is to use SQL Server as a "Slice Server." You could slice three different planes (tables) out of a 3-D cube. For example, if you had a cube that "Financial Data" by "Company" by "Year."...

...> Von: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com [mailto:xen-users- > bounces@lists.xensource.com] Im Auftrag von Cameron Camp > Gesendet: Dienstag, 3. Mai 2011 20:08 > An: Joseph Glanville > Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com > Betreff: Re: [Xen-users] debian Lenny -> Squeeze domU mdX software > raidmigration - failed to assemble arrays > > Yes, my whatever.domain.cfg was insane, I fixed it by leaving: > > root = /dev/xvda2 > > but had to update: > > #kernel = '/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.26-1-xen-amd64' > #ramdisk = '/boot/initrd.img...

Hi Greetings to all Is my first post in this forum sorry for my english Many compliment to all developers for great work in Wine Profili2 is the most famous Windows software for designe airfoil profile for RC airplane models. Some times ago I have installed it in ubuntu 10.10 by Wine(1.3.5) with success This software use an mdb file First I have installed Profili download in this web site

Does software raid 1 compare checksums or otherwise verify that the same bits are coming from both disks during reads? What I'm interested in, is whether bit errors that were somehow undetected by the hardware would be detected by the raid 1 software. Thanks, Nataraj

...file(233) jarboed opened file W32X86/2/KcNtKrnl.dll read=Yes write=No (numopen=1) [2002/08/28 11:45:38, 2] smbd/open.c:open_file(233) jarboed opened file W32X86/2/KcNtUI.dll read=Yes write=No (numopen=2) [2002/08/28 11:45:38, 2] smbd/open.c:open_file(233) jarboed opened file W32X86/2/KMKM5530.MDX read=Yes write=No (numopen=3) [2002/08/28 11:45:38, 2] smbd/open.c:open_file(233) jarboed opened file W32X86/2/KC3D0213.DAT read=Yes write=No (numopen=4) [2002/08/28 11:45:38, 2] smbd/open.c:open_file(233) jarboed opened file W32X86/2/KMAGFA1.FDF read=Yes write=No (numopen=5) [2002/08/28 11:45:...

...NONE /apps/Lacerte/02tax/OPTION02/SID019A.w2 Fri Mar 28 17:37:05 2003 4320 DENY_WRITE 0x20 RDONLY NONE /apps/Lacerte/02tax/engine02.dll Fri Mar 28 17:37:07 2003 4320 DENY_NONE 0x2019f RDWR NONE /apps/Lacerte/02tax/OPTION02/RECURRG2.MDX Fri Mar 28 17:37:06 2003 4320 DENY_WRITE 0x20 RDONLY EXCLUSIVE+BATCH /apps/Lacerte/02tax/ind/i2usfunc.dll Sat Mar 29 18:01:45 2003 4320 DENY_NONE 0x2019f RDWR EXCLUSIVE+BATCH /apps/Lacerte/02tax/IDATA/DATA1I02.MDX Sat Mar 29 18:01:51 2003 4320 DENY_NONE 0x20089...

...ices. I've asked times ago if it's more correct create the md device, partitioning it and create fs on each partition created on md device: mdadm create /dev/md0 ... fdisk /dev/md0: md0p1 swap md0p2 / xfs md0p3 /home xfs or create for each partition an md device and create the fs on mdX device directly: mdadm create /dev/md[012]..... mkfs.fs /dev/mdX (for each md device) md0 swap md1 / md2 /home I got as answer that the second solution is the correct solution. I'm installing C7 1511 on a skylake machine with UEFI and I'm confused. After googling, for my installation I...

We're just using Linux software RAID for the first time - RAID1, and the other day, a drive failed. We have a clone machine to play with, so it's not that critical, but.... I partitioned a replacement drive. On the clone, I marked the RAID partitions on /dev/sda failed, and remove, and pulled the drive. After several iterations, I waited a minute or two, until all messages had stopped,

...-devices=2 /dev/sdb3 /dev/sdc3 > > then I did a lsblk and realized that I used --level=0 instead of --level=1 (spelling mistake) > The SIZE was reported double as I created a striped set by mistake, yet I wanted the mirrored. > > Here starts my problem, I cannot get rid of the /dev/mdX no matter what I do (try to do). > > I tried to delete the MDX, I removed the disks by failing them, then removing each array md0, md1 and md2. > I also did > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdX bs=512 seek=$(($(blockdev --getsz /dev/sdX)-1024)) count=1024 > dd if=/dev/zero of=/de...

Hello all, I have a samba 2.2.1a server running as the PDC of my network on a Mandrake 8.0 system with a reiserFS partition. I am serving for the win98 clients a small DOS clipper program with a DBF database. The programs run well on the workstations when there is only one user using it, when another user try to use the same program it starts to get very slow. I think this is a lock