Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "mdhandlernam".
Did you mean:
mdhandlernames
2009 Sep 16
1
[LLVMdev] [proposal] Extensible IR metadata
...omment whether RegisterMDKind requires that its argument is
as-yet-unknown in Metadata.h.
Context.pImpl->TheMetadata.ValueIsDeleted(this); in ~Value will always
call the empty ValueIsDeleted(Value*) overload.
Please write a unittest for this.
Metadata::getMDKind(Name) can just be "return MDHandlerNames.lookup(Name)"
Could you comment what the WeakVH in MDPairTy is following? I got
confused and thought it was tracking the Instruction holding the
metadata rather than the MDNode.
You did say this was partial; sorry if I pointed out anything you were
already planning to do.
Jeffrey
2009 Nov 25
3
[LLVMdev] DebugInfo and Metadata Store
Hi All,
Now, in llvm trunk we support custom metadata, which can be attached
with llvm instructions. One of the user is "debugging information".
This user is special (not just because it is in llvm svn tree:)
because whenever debug info is available, it is likely that
corresponding metadata is attached with almost all instructions. In
other words, usually it is all or nothing. This
2009 Sep 16
0
[LLVMdev] [proposal] Extensible IR metadata
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
> Devang's work on debug info prompted this, thoughts welcome:
> http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/ExtensibleMetadata.txt
Here is partial initial implementation.
Thoughts ?
-
Devang
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: mdn.diff
Type: application/octet-stream
2009 Sep 11
12
[LLVMdev] [proposal] Extensible IR metadata
Devang's work on debug info prompted this, thoughts welcome:
http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/ExtensibleMetadata.txt
-Chris