Displaying 20 results from an estimated 54 matches for "mdevan".
2010 Sep 03
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-py (Python bindings for LLVM), new release 0.6.
Hi all,
Thought you might be interested:
llvm-py 0.6 was released a couple of days back. This release is
compatible with LLVM 2.7.
Check it out at http://www.mdevan.org/llvm-py/.
llvm-py has it's own mailing list, at http://groups.google.com/group/llvm-py.
Regards,
-Mahadevan.
(author of llvm-py)
2010 Oct 02
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-py (Python bindings for LLVM), new release 0.6.
Hi Mahadevan,
This looks very nice.
Is there a good reason to maintain this outside of the LLVM source
tree, or is this something you would like to see come in tree?
- Daniel
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 10:58 PM, Mahadevan R <mdevan.foobar at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thought you might be interested:
>
> llvm-py 0.6 was released a couple of days back. This release is
> compatible with LLVM 2.7.
> Check it out at http://www.mdevan.org/llvm-py/.
>
> llvm-py has it's own mailing list, at ht...
2008 Nov 22
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-py 0.5 released.
Hi.
Version 0.5 of llvm-py, Python bindings for LLVM, has been released.
This version supports (only) LLVM 2.4. New instructions of LLVM 2.4
(vicmp, vfcmp, insertvalue, extractvalue) are available.
Home page: http://mdevan.nfshost.com/llvm-py/
Feedback welcome.
Thanks & Regards,
-Mahadevan.
2008 Nov 23
1
[LLVMdev] llvm-py 0.5 released.
...adevan R wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>>
>> Version 0.5 of llvm-py, Python bindings for LLVM, has been released.
>> This version supports (only) LLVM 2.4. New instructions of LLVM 2.4
>> (vicmp, vfcmp, insertvalue, extractvalue) are available.
>>
>> Home page: http://mdevan.nfshost.com/llvm-py/
>
> This is *very* cool. We don't currently have a good way to host links
> to projects like yours, but I added it to this page (at the bottom): http://llvm.org/Users.html
Um, it was there already :-)
>
> Hopefully we'll get a better web page to host a...
2009 Jan 05
1
[LLVMdev] Small doc fix.
Hi,
The LLVM Assembly Language Reference [1] incorrectly states that the
prefix used for dll{import,export} is _imp__; it is actually __imp_.
The attached patch fixes this.
Thanks & Regards,
-Mahadevan.
[1] file:///home/mdevan/llvm/docs/LangRef.html#linkage
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: doc-dllimport-prefix.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 1099 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090105/78ae396e/attachment.patch>
2008 Jun 11
0
[LLVMdev] Query on optimization and tail call.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:07 PM, Mahadevan R <mdevan.foobar at gmail.com> wrote:
> int sum(int n)
> {
> return n + sum(n-1);
> }
>
> it generates this:
>
> define i32 @sum(i32 %n) nounwind {
> entry:
> %tmp2 = add i32 %n, -1 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
> %tmp3 = tail call i32 @sum( i32 %tmp2...
2008 Mar 28
0
[LLVMdev] Python bindings?
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 12:00 AM, Mahadevan R <mdevan.foobar at gmail.com> wrote:
> 1)
> Are the C bindings complete? That is, is there some part of the C++ API
> that is not exposed by the C API?
Nope, there's still a lot that's not done. Patches are always welcome
:) We've got enough in subversion to implement the Kaleido...
2008 Jun 11
4
[LLVMdev] Query on optimization and tail call.
Hi,
While playing around on the LLVM, I tried this code:
int sum(int n)
{
if (n == 0)
return 0;
else
return n + sum(n-1);
}
and this is what "llvm-gcc -O2" gave me:
define i32 @sum(i32 %n) nounwind {
entry:
%tmp215 = icmp eq i32 %n, 0 ; <i1> [#uses=1]
br i1 %tmp215, label %bb10, label %tailrecurse.bb10_crit_edge
tailrecurse.bb10_crit_edge: ; preds =
2008 Mar 28
2
[LLVMdev] Python bindings?
> Note that C bindings have been introduced since 2005, so there may be
> a different route available than was taken then. Look in include/llvm-
> c. The intent of the C bindings is to enable high-level language
> bindings. The current focus is on enabling front-end compilers. Ocaml
> and Haskell bindings have been developed atop them, the former being
> in the LLVM source
2008 May 10
4
[LLVMdev] Python bindings available.
....3 latest and Python 2.5
(2.4 should be sufficient, but I haven't tested). Tested only on
Linux/i386.
Would love to hear your comments.
[Needless to say, it's all work in progress, but mostly it works as
expected. More tests, documentation and APIs will follow.]
It's all here: http://mdevan.nfshost.com/llvm-py.html
Thanks & Regards,
-Mahadevan.
2008 Sep 08
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-py 0.3 released.
Hi.
Version 0.3 of llvm-py, Python bindings for LLVM, has been released.
llvm-py now supports reading/writing of bitcode and LLVM assembly
files, intrinsics and all the transformation passes. Also included are
bug fixes and documentation/test updates.
Home page: http://mdevan.nfshost.com/llvm-py/
Thanks & Regards,
-Mahadevan.
2008 Sep 15
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM bindings, scope of llvm-c
> From: OvermindDL1 <overminddl1 at gmail.com>
> There could just as easily be language bindings between C++ and
> Python, he chose the C bindings probably just because they were
> easier, but they are most certainly not required. I know that is the
> case in a few other scripting languages as well.
He ( I :-) ) chose llvm-c based on the thread starting here:
2008 Nov 21
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-py 0.4 released.
...LLVM, has been released. A
few bug fixes, new APIs and code cleanup have gone in for this
version.
This will be the last release of llvm-py based on LLVM 2.3. Next
version (0.5) will be based on LLVM 2.4 and will not be compatible
with LLVM 2.3. I hope to release 0.5 very soon.
Home page: http://mdevan.nfshost.com/llvm-py/
Thanks & Regards,
-Mahadevan.
2008 Nov 23
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-py 0.5 released.
...; Mahadevan R wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> Version 0.5 of llvm-py, Python bindings for LLVM, has been released.
>> This version supports (only) LLVM 2.4. New instructions of LLVM 2.4
>> (vicmp, vfcmp, insertvalue, extractvalue) are available.
>>
>> Home page: http://mdevan.nfshost.com/llvm-py/
>>
>> Feedback welcome.
>
> This is very nice. I especially appreciate the extensive user guide!
>
> Why do you use IPRED_xx and RPRED_xx instead of ICMP_xx and FCMP_xx? The
> latter is what we use in the C++ code and it seems to me that this is an
&g...
2012 Feb 17
0
[LLVMdev] LLVMTypeHandlerRef is missing?
Hi, I tried to build llvm-py (http://www.mdevan.org/llvm-py/) using LLVM
3.0.1, and I got these errors in a few places:
error: unknown type name ‘LLVMTypeHandleRef’
I did a quick search, and my guess is LLVMTypeHandleRef is not exist in
LLVM 3 anymore:
http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/Core_8h_source.html
So is there any equivalent? Maybe LLVM...
2008 May 16
2
[LLVMdev] Matching struct layouts.
"Mahadevan R" <mdevan.foobar at gmail.com> writes:
>> You could use llvm-gcc to convert the struct to an LLVM type.
>> Otherwise, it wouldn't be too hard to convert the struct by
>> hand as long as it doesn't have any exotic types in it. A
>> VLA at the end (with element type T) is c...
2008 Jun 15
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-py: Python bindings for LLVM: 0.2 released.
Hello All,
llvm-py 0.2 has been released. IR, execution engine, and (some) passes
are now covered. There is also a much better website; code is now
hosted on google code.
Visit http://mdevan.nfshost.com/llvm-py/index.html for more details.
Thanks & Regards,
-Mahadevan.
2008 Jul 08
0
[LLVMdev] Intrinsics and it's documentation.
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:41 PM, Mahadevan R <mdevan.foobar at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 12:00 AM, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Mahadevan R wrote:
>>> While going through the list of intrinsics in Intrinsics.td, I found
>>> that it does not match the list given...
2008 May 16
0
[LLVMdev] Matching struct layouts.
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
>> > If this is an arbitrary struct, it can be quite tricky. Do you have
>> > to worry about bitfields and variable sized fields (for example a
>> > variable length array at the end)? What about unions?
>>
>> There are no bitfields, but it does have a variable length array at
2008 Jul 08
2
[LLVMdev] Intrinsics and it's documentation.
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 12:00 AM, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Mahadevan R wrote:
>> While going through the list of intrinsics in Intrinsics.td, I found
>> that it does not match the list given in Language Reference [1]. Does
>> this mean that they are not to be used / don't work? Or is it just
>> that the documentation is