search for: mdevan

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 54 matches for "mdevan".

2010 Sep 03
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-py (Python bindings for LLVM), new release 0.6.
Hi all, Thought you might be interested: llvm-py 0.6 was released a couple of days back. This release is compatible with LLVM 2.7. Check it out at http://www.mdevan.org/llvm-py/. llvm-py has it's own mailing list, at http://groups.google.com/group/llvm-py. Regards, -Mahadevan. (author of llvm-py)
2010 Oct 02
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-py (Python bindings for LLVM), new release 0.6.
Hi Mahadevan, This looks very nice. Is there a good reason to maintain this outside of the LLVM source tree, or is this something you would like to see come in tree? - Daniel On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 10:58 PM, Mahadevan R <mdevan.foobar at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Thought you might be interested: > > llvm-py 0.6 was released a couple of days back. This release is > compatible with LLVM 2.7. > Check it out at http://www.mdevan.org/llvm-py/. > > llvm-py has it's own mailing list, at ht...
2008 Nov 22
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-py 0.5 released.
Hi. Version 0.5 of llvm-py, Python bindings for LLVM, has been released. This version supports (only) LLVM 2.4. New instructions of LLVM 2.4 (vicmp, vfcmp, insertvalue, extractvalue) are available. Home page: http://mdevan.nfshost.com/llvm-py/ Feedback welcome. Thanks & Regards, -Mahadevan.
2008 Nov 23
1
[LLVMdev] llvm-py 0.5 released.
...adevan R wrote: > >> Hi. >> >> Version 0.5 of llvm-py, Python bindings for LLVM, has been released. >> This version supports (only) LLVM 2.4. New instructions of LLVM 2.4 >> (vicmp, vfcmp, insertvalue, extractvalue) are available. >> >> Home page: http://mdevan.nfshost.com/llvm-py/ > > This is *very* cool. We don't currently have a good way to host links > to projects like yours, but I added it to this page (at the bottom): http://llvm.org/Users.html Um, it was there already :-) > > Hopefully we'll get a better web page to host a...
2009 Jan 05
1
[LLVMdev] Small doc fix.
Hi, The LLVM Assembly Language Reference [1] incorrectly states that the prefix used for dll{import,export} is _imp__; it is actually __imp_. The attached patch fixes this. Thanks & Regards, -Mahadevan. [1] file:///home/mdevan/llvm/docs/LangRef.html#linkage -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: doc-dllimport-prefix.patch Type: text/x-diff Size: 1099 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090105/78ae396e/attachment.patch>
2008 Jun 11
0
[LLVMdev] Query on optimization and tail call.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:07 PM, Mahadevan R <mdevan.foobar at gmail.com> wrote: > int sum(int n) > { > return n + sum(n-1); > } > > it generates this: > > define i32 @sum(i32 %n) nounwind { > entry: > %tmp2 = add i32 %n, -1 ; <i32> [#uses=1] > %tmp3 = tail call i32 @sum( i32 %tmp2...
2008 Mar 28
0
[LLVMdev] Python bindings?
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 12:00 AM, Mahadevan R <mdevan.foobar at gmail.com> wrote: > 1) > Are the C bindings complete? That is, is there some part of the C++ API > that is not exposed by the C API? Nope, there's still a lot that's not done. Patches are always welcome :) We've got enough in subversion to implement the Kaleido...
2008 Jun 11
4
[LLVMdev] Query on optimization and tail call.
Hi, While playing around on the LLVM, I tried this code: int sum(int n) { if (n == 0) return 0; else return n + sum(n-1); } and this is what "llvm-gcc -O2" gave me: define i32 @sum(i32 %n) nounwind { entry: %tmp215 = icmp eq i32 %n, 0 ; <i1> [#uses=1] br i1 %tmp215, label %bb10, label %tailrecurse.bb10_crit_edge tailrecurse.bb10_crit_edge: ; preds =
2008 Mar 28
2
[LLVMdev] Python bindings?
> Note that C bindings have been introduced since 2005, so there may be > a different route available than was taken then. Look in include/llvm- > c. The intent of the C bindings is to enable high-level language > bindings. The current focus is on enabling front-end compilers. Ocaml > and Haskell bindings have been developed atop them, the former being > in the LLVM source
2008 May 10
4
[LLVMdev] Python bindings available.
....3 latest and Python 2.5 (2.4 should be sufficient, but I haven't tested). Tested only on Linux/i386. Would love to hear your comments. [Needless to say, it's all work in progress, but mostly it works as expected. More tests, documentation and APIs will follow.] It's all here: http://mdevan.nfshost.com/llvm-py.html Thanks & Regards, -Mahadevan.
2008 Sep 08
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-py 0.3 released.
Hi. Version 0.3 of llvm-py, Python bindings for LLVM, has been released. llvm-py now supports reading/writing of bitcode and LLVM assembly files, intrinsics and all the transformation passes. Also included are bug fixes and documentation/test updates. Home page: http://mdevan.nfshost.com/llvm-py/ Thanks & Regards, -Mahadevan.
2008 Sep 15
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM bindings, scope of llvm-c
> From: OvermindDL1 <overminddl1 at gmail.com> > There could just as easily be language bindings between C++ and > Python, he chose the C bindings probably just because they were > easier, but they are most certainly not required. I know that is the > case in a few other scripting languages as well. He ( I :-) ) chose llvm-c based on the thread starting here:
2008 Nov 21
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-py 0.4 released.
...LLVM, has been released. A few bug fixes, new APIs and code cleanup have gone in for this version. This will be the last release of llvm-py based on LLVM 2.3. Next version (0.5) will be based on LLVM 2.4 and will not be compatible with LLVM 2.3. I hope to release 0.5 very soon. Home page: http://mdevan.nfshost.com/llvm-py/ Thanks & Regards, -Mahadevan.
2008 Nov 23
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-py 0.5 released.
...; Mahadevan R wrote: >> Hi. >> >> Version 0.5 of llvm-py, Python bindings for LLVM, has been released. >> This version supports (only) LLVM 2.4. New instructions of LLVM 2.4 >> (vicmp, vfcmp, insertvalue, extractvalue) are available. >> >> Home page: http://mdevan.nfshost.com/llvm-py/ >> >> Feedback welcome. > > This is very nice. I especially appreciate the extensive user guide! > > Why do you use IPRED_xx and RPRED_xx instead of ICMP_xx and FCMP_xx? The > latter is what we use in the C++ code and it seems to me that this is an &g...
2012 Feb 17
0
[LLVMdev] LLVMTypeHandlerRef is missing?
Hi, I tried to build llvm-py (http://www.mdevan.org/llvm-py/) using LLVM 3.0.1, and I got these errors in a few places: error: unknown type name ‘LLVMTypeHandleRef’ I did a quick search, and my guess is LLVMTypeHandleRef is not exist in LLVM 3 anymore: http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/Core_8h_source.html So is there any equivalent? Maybe LLVM...
2008 May 16
2
[LLVMdev] Matching struct layouts.
"Mahadevan R" <mdevan.foobar at gmail.com> writes: >> You could use llvm-gcc to convert the struct to an LLVM type. >> Otherwise, it wouldn't be too hard to convert the struct by >> hand as long as it doesn't have any exotic types in it. A >> VLA at the end (with element type T) is c...
2008 Jun 15
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-py: Python bindings for LLVM: 0.2 released.
Hello All, llvm-py 0.2 has been released. IR, execution engine, and (some) passes are now covered. There is also a much better website; code is now hosted on google code. Visit http://mdevan.nfshost.com/llvm-py/index.html for more details. Thanks & Regards, -Mahadevan.
2008 Jul 08
0
[LLVMdev] Intrinsics and it's documentation.
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:41 PM, Mahadevan R <mdevan.foobar at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 12:00 AM, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: >> On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Mahadevan R wrote: >>> While going through the list of intrinsics in Intrinsics.td, I found >>> that it does not match the list given...
2008 May 16
0
[LLVMdev] Matching struct layouts.
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: >> > If this is an arbitrary struct, it can be quite tricky. Do you have >> > to worry about bitfields and variable sized fields (for example a >> > variable length array at the end)? What about unions? >> >> There are no bitfields, but it does have a variable length array at
2008 Jul 08
2
[LLVMdev] Intrinsics and it's documentation.
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 12:00 AM, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Mahadevan R wrote: >> While going through the list of intrinsics in Intrinsics.td, I found >> that it does not match the list given in Language Reference [1]. Does >> this mean that they are not to be used / don't work? Or is it just >> that the documentation is