search for: mdaniel

Hello, With GCC, it is possible to compile GIMPLE from an object file back to assembly. With Dragonegg, it seems to be a NOP. (See below for a comparison.) This appears it could be a nice way to mix the strengths of GCC and LLVM. If it worked.. Should it? Thanks, Marcus [mdaniels at dn002 dragonegg]$ cat hello.c #include <stdio.h> int hello () { printf ("Hello World\n"); } [mdaniels at dn002 dragonegg]$ gcc-4.5 -flto -c hello.c[mdaniels at dn002 dragonegg]$ gcc-4.5 -S -x lto hello.o [mdaniels at dn002 dragonegg]$ cat hello.s .file "hello.o&quo...

>> Bah, they can install Mingw binaries. > Sure! Actually, I wonder why people care about Visual Studio at all. Basic MSVC linkage should work with Mingw. Anything that doesn't work is probably something that ultimately needs to be understood on the clang/llvm side for the sake of clean integration. IMO, a compatible & mature open source Windows toolchain like Mingw that

On Jan 11, 2013, at 10:02 AM, <dag at cray.com> wrote: > "Daniels, Marcus G" <mdaniels at lanl.gov> writes: > >> Anyway, I thought the question here amounted to how to ensure that >> people can make binaries of LLVM libraries and a working clang >> executable on Windows. > > No, it's more than that. Many (most?) groups integrate clang and/or >...

"Unfortunately, that does appear to be the case. I think MSVC 2010 is a reasonable requirement, but it seems like 2012 is the real target for C++11 features." Bah, they can install Mingw binaries. Marcus -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130110/eb78b89f/attachment.html>

"Daniels, Marcus G" <mdaniels at lanl.gov> writes: >> "Unfortunately, that does appear to be the case. I think MSVC 2010 is >> a reasonable requirement, but it seems like 2012 is the real target >> for C++11 features." IMO, the only meaty C++11 feature that VS2012 adds over VS2010 is range-base...

"Daniels, Marcus G" <mdaniels at lanl.gov> writes: [snip] It is obvious that you don't develop C++ software on Windows for a living.

"Daniels, Marcus G" <mdaniels at lanl.gov> writes: > Anyway, I thought the question here amounted to how to ensure that > people can make binaries of LLVM libraries and a working clang > executable on Windows. No, it's more than that. Many (most?) groups integrate clang and/or llvm libraries into larger proj...

Hi there, I am currently working on something that uses hdf5 library. I think hdf5 is a great data format, I've used it somewhat extensively in python via PyTables. I was looking for something similar to that in R. The closest I can get is this library: hdf5. While it does not work the same way as PyTables did, but it's good enough to let them exchange data via hdf5 file. There is just 1

...o cache. - the posting http://forums.digium.com/viewtopic.php?t=4363&highlight relates to SIP UAs registered with Asterisk, not those registered with SER. - the article http://openser.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/asterisk:realtime-integration doesn't deal with MWI. - the posting http://asterisk.mdaniel.net/?p=14 creates the msg<num>.txt file on a remote Asterisk server and so is not relevant to my scenario. Can anyone advise how they are sending SIP Notify messages from Asterisk to SER for non-cached realtime SIP peers? Regards Cameron

...t at least use 2010. We just need a hard decision on minimum supported gcc so we can figure out _exactly_ what features we can use. - Michael Spencer > > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: >> >> "Daniels, Marcus G" <mdaniels at lanl.gov> writes: >> >> [snip] >> >> It is obvious that you don't develop C++ software on Windows for a >> living. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu...

...st for 3.3. And then perhaps move to MSVC 2012 for 3.4. That should allow for enough time for users to upgrade. So, can we limit ourselves to MSVC 2010-level support for 3.3? On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: > "Daniels, Marcus G" <mdaniels at lanl.gov> writes: > > [snip] > > It is obvious that you don't develop C++ software on Windows for a > living. > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http:/...

...normal functions and that is what causes the code to be generated. That being said, on my list of things to do is fix this so that any function will be generated correctly and also create calling conventions that differentiate between kernels and non-kernels. Micah From: Daniels, Marcus G [mailto:mdaniels at lanl.gov] Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 7:19 AM To: Villmow, Micah Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] AMD IL Code Generator Backend for OpenCL On Dec 12, 2011, at 9:09 AM, Villmow, Micah wrote: LLVM-IR that isn't generated from AMD's OpenCL frontend does not...

On 10 September 2010 14:37, Marcus Daniels <mdaniels at lanl.gov> wrote: >  Hello, > > With GCC, it is possible to compile GIMPLE from an object file back to > assembly.  With Dragonegg, it seems to be a NOP.  (See below for a > comparison.) > > This appears it could be a nice way to mix the strengths of GCC and > LLVM.  I...

By the way, the GIMPLE front end (the GCC branch) would seem to be appealing for use in conjunction with LLVM. The idea being to be able to select what stages of GCC compilation were compiled. (The front end appears it is some way off from being usable.) Marcus

On Dec 12, 2011, at 9:09 AM, Villmow, Micah wrote: LLVM-IR that isn’t generated from AMD’s OpenCL frontend does not produce any AMDIL. Is this because of the way metadata is handled? If so, will that technique be documented? Or can it be reasonably inferred from the source code? Thanks, Marcus -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Daniels, Marcus G <mdaniels at lanl.gov>wrote: > > > >> Bah, they can install Mingw binaries. > > > Sure! Actually, I wonder why people care about Visual Studio at all. > > Basic MSVC linkage should work with Mingw. Anything that doesn't work is > probably something that ultimately n...

Hello everybody, I'm using hdf5 files to store results from intermediate calculations. These are usually part of a list, called "res". As I want the hdf-files to contain all the members of res in its top "directory", I used to do attach(res) do.call("hdf5save", args=c(fileout=file.path(dir, ofile), as.list(names(res)))) detach(res) which did what I

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 04:27, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hopefully this is feasible, as I said I didn't work on > it yet. It sounds doable, but I'm not sure why would you want to convert the gimple into LLVM bitcode, if you are already saving LLVM bitcode in the file. Wouldn't you be just duplicating code? Diego.

I am proud to announce that AMD is Open Sourcing AMDIL Code Generator for LLVM 2.9. While this version is not for uptake into LLVM mainline, it does build and is compatible with LLVM 2.9. This is the first step of the process, so I know there will be issues that show up. In the next few months, we will be providing more unit tests and an LLVM 3.0 compatible version, and finally a TOT version for

Hi Micah, all, On Dec 13, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Villmow, Micah wrote: If you look at the test cases, you can infer what needs to be done. Basically since this is targeted for OpenCL, we annotate OpenCL kernels slightly different than normal functions and that is what causes the code to be generated. That being said, on my list of things to do is fix this so that any function will be generated