Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "md_unus".
Did you mean:
md_unused
2017 Oct 18
2
RFC: Generate plain !tbaa tags in place of !tbaa.struct ones
...t for !tbaa.struct tags.
I guess we would want to remove all code which only purpose is
to generate such tags, but I'm not sure what we should do with
the MD_tbaa_struct enumerator. Some possible options:
a) Leave it as is, just don't use it.
b) Rename to something like MD_unused.
c) Remove, but do not change the values of other MD_*
enumerators.
d) Remove and adjust values of other MD_* enumerators
respectively.
Or, maybe we want some multi-stage plan here?
Further steps are supposed to include things like fixing SROA to
propagate TBAA informat...
2017 Oct 31
2
RFC: Generate plain !tbaa tags in place of !tbaa.struct ones
...guess we would want to remove all code which only purpose is
>> to generate such tags, but I'm not sure what we should do with
>> the MD_tbaa_struct enumerator. Some possible options:
>> a) Leave it as is, just don't use it.
>> b) Rename to something like MD_unused.
>> c) Remove, but do not change the values of other MD_*
>> enumerators.
>> d) Remove and adjust values of other MD_* enumerators
>> respectively.
>> Or, maybe we want some multi-stage plan here?
>>
>> Further steps are supposed to i...
2017 Oct 31
1
RFC: Generate plain !tbaa tags in place of !tbaa.struct ones
...ant to remove all code which only purpose is
>>> to generate such tags, but I'm not sure what we should do with
>>> the MD_tbaa_struct enumerator. Some possible options:
>>> a) Leave it as is, just don't use it.
>>> b) Rename to something like MD_unused.
>>> c) Remove, but do not change the values of other MD_*
>>> enumerators.
>>> d) Remove and adjust values of other MD_* enumerators
>>> respectively.
>>> Or, maybe we want some multi-stage plan here?
>>>
>>> Fur...
2017 Nov 02
2
RFC: Generate plain !tbaa tags in place of !tbaa.struct ones
...y purpose is
>>>>> to generate such tags, but I'm not sure what we should do with
>>>>> the MD_tbaa_struct enumerator. Some possible options:
>>>>> a) Leave it as is, just don't use it.
>>>>> b) Rename to something like MD_unused.
>>>>> c) Remove, but do not change the values of other MD_*
>>>>> enumerators.
>>>>> d) Remove and adjust values of other MD_* enumerators
>>>>> respectively.
>>>>> Or, maybe we want some multi-stage...