search for: md127p1

I'm confused about which UUID to use to identify a software RAID in fstab. lsblk -fs shows: md127p1 ext4 c43af789-82aa-49e9-a8ed-acd52b1cdd58 /y --- md127 ext4 39c20575-4257-4fd7-b5c8-8a15757e9e8e --- sdb1 linux_r hostname:0 af77830e-8cfd-9012-62ce-e57105c3bf6c --- sdb --- sdc1 linux_r hostname:0 af77830e-8cfd-9012-62ce-e57105c3bf6c --...

...F +# Add 2 empty disks +sparse $disk1 50M +sparse $disk2 50M +run + +# Create a raid0 based on the 2 disks +md-create test "/dev/sda /dev/sdb" level:raid0 + +part-init /dev/md127 mbr +part-add /dev/md127 p 64 41023 +part-add /dev/md127 p 41024 81983 + +# Create filesystems +mkfs ext3 /dev/md127p1 +mkfs ext4 /dev/md127p2 + +list-filesystems +EOF +) + +expected="/dev/md127p1: ext3 +/dev/md127p2: ext4" + +if [ "$output" != "$expected" ]; then + echo "$0: error: actual output did not match expected output" + echo -e "actual:\n$output" +...

...e partitions, and *then* grub2-install? 2. I *think* that one thing that grub2-install is complaining about is that it can't find /boot/grub2. I've tried doing it with $ grub2-install --boot-directory=/boot /dev/sda and $ grub2-install --boot-directory=/dev/md127p1/ /dev/sda and $ grub2-install --boot-directory=/dev/md127pw/boot /dev/sda and it tells me it cannot find the canonical path for the grub2 directory. Is there some way to specify where it should fund /boot/grub2 that I've missed? mark

...Valeri > 2. I *think* that one thing that grub2-install is complaining about is > that it can't > find /boot/grub2. I've tried doing it with > $ grub2-install --boot-directory=/boot /dev/sda > and > $ grub2-install --boot-directory=/dev/md127p1/ /dev/sda > and > $ grub2-install --boot-directory=/dev/md127pw/boot /dev/sda > and it tells me it cannot find the canonical path for the grub2 > directory. Is > there some way to specify where it should fund /boot/grub2 that > I've missed? > &...

Initial discussion is here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2018-January/msg00188.html. v2 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2018-January/msg00246.html. v3 comparing to v2 is just a rebase with slightly changed commits comments.

Instead of parsing 'parted' output OCaml implementation relies on the following facts: 1. The function is applicable for MBR partitions only (as noted in documentation and as function name suggests). 2. An attempt to call the function for non-MBR partition fails with "part_get_mbr_part_type can only be used on MBR Partitions" error and NULL is returned. 3. MBR partition table

This patch series addresses comments after v6 series review. Mykola Ivanets (6): daemon: Changing the way that we detect if a device contains partitions. daemon: list-filesystems: Ignore partitioned MD devices. tests: list-filesystems command ignores partitioned MD devices. daemon: list-filesystems: Change the way we filter out LDM partitions. daemon: list-filesystems: Filter out

Before I rush to change something I request your comments on the subject. Let me know what do you think and if it does make sense. The issue: guesfs_list_filesystems is inconsistent in its output. For, example, it filters out partitioned physical devices but doesn't do the same for MD devices. More over, according to its name and API documentation guestfs_list_filesystem should return

This patch series: 1. Addresses comments from last review: part_get_mbr_part_type doesn't break original implementation in C. 2. Rebased on top of master and little bit refactored for readability. Mykola Ivanets (1): tests: md: Test guestfish list-filesystems command skips partitioned md devices. Nikolay Ivanets (2): daemon: Reimplement 'part_get_mbr_part_type' API in

v8: - Rebased on top of master. v7: - Addresses comments after v6 series review. v6: - Addresses comments after v5 series review. - Large commit is splitted to more granular commits for better code review. v5: - Addresses comments after v4 series review (part_get_mbr_part_type doesn't break original implementation in C). - Rebased on top of master and little bit refactored for

This patch series: 1. Addresses comments from v5 series review 2. Large commit is splitted to more granular commits for better code review. Mykola Ivanets (6): daemon: Changing the way that we detect if a device contains partitions. daemon: list-filesystems: Ignore partitioned MD devices. tests: list-filesystems command ignores partitioned MD devices. daemon: list-filesystems: Change