search for: md10

this has never happened to me before, and I'm somewhat at a loss. got a email from the cron thing... /etc/cron.weekly/99-raid-check: WARNING: mismatch_cnt is not 0 on /dev/md10 WARNING: mismatch_cnt is not 0 on /dev/md11 ok, md10 and md11 are each raid1's made from 2 x 72GB scsi drives, on a dell 2850 or something dual single-core 3ghz server. these two md's are in turn a striped LVM volume group dmesg shows.... md: syncing RAID array md10 md: mi...

I'm trying to set up a Samba server on my Linux Mandrake 10 machine. I've copied the smb.conf settings from the Samba Howto and look like this: [global] workgroup = Thuis netbios name = Linux printcap name = cups disable spoolss = Yes show add printer wizard = No printing = cups [homes] comment = Home Directories valid users = %S read only = No browseable = No [public] comment = Data

I'm going to rebuild my system at home soon, and was planning to mirror two drives. However, I was just looking up something about RAID, and on wikipedia found some information about the Linux MD driver, and "near" and "far" RAID10. Anyone have some opinions about them? mark "or should that be how many opinions do folks have about them?"

...the same goes for the rest.  Then we maintain a BITSET class to encapsulate the 'union', 'intersect', 'diff' etc to simply the operations bewteen special  MD and other general MDs. e.g: union operation bewteen special MD and general MD. Given BITSET a, b; a={MD1} b={MD10} c={MD20} Here MD10, MD20 are general MD. They described the actually variable. b.union(c) equal to {MD10, MD20} a.union(b)  equal to {MD1} b.union(a) equal to {MD1} Our flow-sensitive method is divided into 2 step: 1. Iterative solve flow-equation to compute POINT-TO for each stm...

Hi, xfs is supposed to detect the layout of a md-RAID devices when creating the file system, but it doesn?t seem to do that: # cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid1] md10 : active raid1 sde[1] sdd[0] 499976512 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU] bitmap: 0/4 pages [0KB], 65536KB chunk # mkfs.xfs /dev/md10p2 meta-data=/dev/md10p2 isize=512 agcount=4, agsize=30199892 blks = sectsz=512 attr=2, projid32bit=1...

FreeBSD version: 5.1-RELEASE Hi, I'm quite new to FreeBSD. I've check list archives and read a handbook, but I didn't find solution to my problem and I hope this is not off-topic. I've installed 5.1-RELEASE, enabled ACLs on the filesystems and I wanted to test MAC features. I'm also new to MAC, so perhaps this is some my mistake. When I enable mac_biba or mac_lomac (in

...union', 'intersect', 'diff' etc to simply the operations bewteen special > MD and other general MDs. Okay. > e.g: union operation bewteen special MD and general MD. > > Given BITSET a, b; > a={MD1} > b={MD10} > c={MD20} > > Here MD10, MD20 are general MD. They described the actually variable. > > b.union(c) equal to {MD10, MD20} > a.union(b) equal to {MD1} > b.union(a) equal to {MD1} > > Our flow...

Hi all, I'm looking for a way to recreate the functionality of PGP Disk (under Win32). Basically, create an encrypted file, which contains a filesystem which can then be mounted in any mount point. I know I can use GELI in FreeBSD 6 - as I understand, it performs the encryption at the partition level (the whole partition is encrypted). I'd like to be able to simply unmount my

...id partition from every disk to a file, ignoring the > read errors on one of the disks. > * Build the RAID5 like this: > > mdadm --create --assume-clean --level=5 --raid-devices=4 --spare-devices=0 \ > --metadata=1.0 --layout=left-symmetric --chunk=64 --bitmap=none \ > /dev/md10 /dev/loop0 missing /dev/loop2 /dev/loop3 > > * Recover 99.9% of the data from /dev/md10. > Why not recover directly from backup? This saves time. From your last command why you inserted /dev/loopN? > One more hint for those interested: > Even with RAID1, I don't use the who...

On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Steven Su <steven_known at yahoo.com.cn> wrote: > Hi, John > I am building a flow sensitive intra-procedural alias analysis(without interprocedural info). > So, the first thing I have to consider is where a parameter-pointer or a global-pointer might point to. > Then I defined several special Virtual Memory Locations:

...did was: * Dump the complete raid partition from every disk to a file, ignoring the read errors on one of the disks. * Build the RAID5 like this: mdadm --create --assume-clean --level=5 --raid-devices=4 --spare-devices=0 \ --metadata=1.0 --layout=left-symmetric --chunk=64 --bitmap=none \ /dev/md10 /dev/loop0 missing /dev/loop2 /dev/loop3 * Recover 99.9% of the data from /dev/md10. One more hint for those interested: Even with RAID1, I don't use the whole disk as one big RAID1. Instead, I slice it into equally sized parts - not physically :-) - and create multiple smaller RAID1 arrays o...

...n /dev/md5 939M 237M 654M 27% / /dev/md0 91M 22M 65M 25% /boot /dev/md6 277M 8.1M 254M 4% /tmp /dev/md7 1.8G 1.3G 595M 69% /usr /dev/md8 938M 761M 177M 82% /var /dev/md9 9.2G 2.6G 6.1G 30% /home /dev/md10 11G 2.1G 8.7G 19% /scratch /dev/md12 56G 43G 13G 77% /global The /usr and /var filesystems keep switching to ro mode following the detection of errors. This has been happening on a daily basis since switching to ext3 (usually the /var switches, /usr has done it on...

Hi, John I am building a flow sensitive intra-procedural alias analysis(without interprocedural info). So, the first thing I have to consider is where a parameter-pointer or a global-pointer might point to. Then I defined several special Virtual Memory Locations: ALL_MEMORY, GLOBAL_MEMORY, STACK_MEMORY, HEAP_MEMORY. ALL_MEMORY contains GLOBAL_MEMORY, STACK_MEMORY, HEAP_MEMORY. e.g1:

...hris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, hw <hw at gc-24.de> said: >> xfs is supposed to detect the layout of a md-RAID devices when creating the >> file system, but it doesn?t seem to do that: >> >> >> # cat /proc/mdstat >> Personalities : [raid1] >> md10 : active raid1 sde[1] sdd[0] >> 499976512 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU] >> bitmap: 0/4 pages [0KB], 65536KB chunk > > RAID 1 has no "layout" (for RAID, that usually refers to striping in > RAID levels 0/5/6), so there's nothing for a filesystem to detect...

...ring the install. Now the problem is that I can't get it to show up in anaconda. It detects the other arrays (raid0 and raid1) fine, but the raid10 array won't show up. Looking through the logs (Alt-F3), I see the following warning: WARNING: raid level RAID10 not supported, skipping md10. I'm starting to hate the installer more and more. Why won't it let me install on this device, even though it's working perfectly from the shell? Why am I the only one having this problem? Is nobody out there using md based raid10? Russ

...<source dev='/dev/vg_lilith/lv_satan_swap'/> <target dev='xvdc' bus='xen'/> </disk> <disk type='block' device='disk'> <driver name='phy' type='raw'/> <source dev='/dev/md10'/> <target dev='xvdd' bus='xen'/> </disk> <disk type='block' device='disk'> <driver name='phy' type='raw'/> <source dev='/dev/disk/by-uuid/6beff9f2-a88c-4d21-86c6-ff90439b4ca3'/&...

...gnoring >> the >> read errors on one of the disks. >> * Build the RAID5 like this: >> >> mdadm --create --assume-clean --level=5 --raid-devices=4 >> --spare-devices=0 \ >> --metadata=1.0 --layout=left-symmetric --chunk=64 --bitmap=none \ >> /dev/md10 /dev/loop0 missing /dev/loop2 /dev/loop3 >> >> * Recover 99.9% of the data from /dev/md10. >> > > Why not recover directly from backup? This saves time. > From your last command why you inserted /dev/loopN? I that case, the owner of the NAS was a photographer who had a...

...976640 blocks [2/2] [UU] md6 : active raid1 hdk5[1] hde5[0] 292672 blocks [2/2] [UU] md7 : active raid1 hdk6[1] hde6[0] 1952896 blocks [2/2] [UU] md8 : active raid1 hdk7[1] hde7[0] 976640 blocks [2/2] [UU] md9 : active raid1 hdk8[1] hde8[0] 9765376 blocks [2/2] [UU] md10 : active raid0 hdk9[1] hde9[0] 12108800 blocks 4k chunks md12 : active raid5 hdk3[3] hde3[2] hdc2[1] hda2[0] 59978304 blocks level 5, 32k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/4] [UUUU] md11 : active raid1 hdk4[1] hde4[0] 170240 blocks [2/2] [UU] Now, the filesystems are set-up as shown: jlm@...

On 01/30/19 03:45, Alessandro Baggi wrote: > Il 29/01/19 20:42, mark ha scritto: >> Alessandro Baggi wrote: >>> Il 29/01/19 18:47, mark ha scritto: >>>> Alessandro Baggi wrote: >>>>> Il 29/01/19 15:03, mark ha scritto: >>>>> >>>>>> I've no idea what happened, but the box I was working on last week

...we set this up about 5 years ago and IIRC we set aside the first 10GB on drive 0 as a boot partition. Grub runs and the system tries to boot 2.6.18-308.20.1.el5xen, sees a dirty raid array and md: md0: raid array is not clean - starting background reconstruction which looks hopeful but then md10: not enough operational mirrors for raid 10 and then the panic and reboot. ideas? stuff to read? diagnostics? TIA, Dave -- "As long as politics is the shadow cast on society by big business, the attenuation of the shadow will not change the substance." -- John Dewey