search for: md0p1

Displaying 17 results from an estimated 17 matches for "md0p1".

2020 Nov 15
5
(C8) root on mdraid
Hello everyone. I'm trying to install CentOS 8 with root and swap partitions on software raid. The plan is: - create md0 raid level 1 with 2 hard drives: /dev/sda and /dev/sdb, using Linux Rscue CD, - install CentOS 8 with Virtual Box on my laptop, - rsync CentOS 8 root partition on /dev/md0p1, - chroot in CentOS 8 root partition, - configure /etc/mdadm.conf, grub.cfg, initramfs, install bootloader on both sda and sdb drives. I think I can do first four of the above, but my CentOS installation acts strange after rebooting the server. It recognizes the raid, but boots randomly with root...
2013 Jun 07
0
Re: cgroup error starting domains
...ysfs rw,relatime 0 0 tmpfs /run tmpfs rw,relatime,mode=755 0 0 devpts /dev/pts devpts rw,relatime,gid=5,mode=620,ptmxmode=000 0 0 fusectl /sys/fs/fuse/connections fusectl rw,relatime 0 0 /dev/sda1 /media/oldslack ext4 rw,noatime,data=ordered 0 0 /dev/sdb1 /home ext4 rw,noatime,data=ordered 0 0 /dev/md0p1 /data ext4 rw,noatime,data=ordered 0 0 tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs rw,relatime 0 0 gvfsd-fuse /home/poncez/.gvfs fuse.gvfsd-fuse rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=1000,group_id=100 0 0 cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup cgroup rw,relatime,bfqio,hugetlb,perf_event,blkio,net_cls,freezer,devices,memory,cpuacct,cpu,cpuset,...
2013 Jun 07
2
Re: cgroup error starting domains
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 06:26:23PM +0200, Matteo Bernardini wrote: > On 05/22/2013 11:01 AM, Matteo Bernardini wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've got a small problem using libvirt-1.0.5.1 (with the latest patch in > > the v1.0.5-maint branch on git added). > > I'm using slackware64-14.0 but the situation is exactly the same described > > on a debian bug
2016 Mar 12
4
C7 + UEFI + GPT + RAID1
...home. From several how-to concerning raid1 installation, I must put each partition on a different md devices. I've asked times ago if it's more correct create the md device, partitioning it and create fs on each partition created on md device: mdadm create /dev/md0 ... fdisk /dev/md0: md0p1 swap md0p2 / xfs md0p3 /home xfs or create for each partition an md device and create the fs on mdX device directly: mdadm create /dev/md[012]..... mkfs.fs /dev/mdX (for each md device) md0 swap md1 / md2 /home I got as answer that the second solution is the correct solution. I'm insta...
2017 Jul 14
0
[PATCH 05/27] daemon: Reimplement several devsparts APIs in OCaml.
...= 1; - size_t n = strlen (part); - - while (n >= 1 && c_isdigit (part[n-1])) { - err = 0; - n--; - } - - if (err) { - reply_with_error ("device name is not a partition"); - return NULL; - } - - /* Deal with <device>p<N> partition names such as /dev/md0p1. */ - if (part[n-1] == 'p') - n--; - - char *r = strndup (part, n); - if (r == NULL) { - reply_with_perror ("strdup"); - return NULL; - } - - return r; -} - -int -do_part_to_partnum (const char *part) -{ - int err = 1; - size_t n = strlen (part); - - while (n >...
2020 Nov 16
0
(C8) root on mdraid
...#39;m trying to install CentOS 8 with root and swap partitions on > software raid. The plan is: > - create md0 raid level 1 with 2 hard drives: /dev/sda and /dev/sdb, > using Linux Rscue CD, > - install CentOS 8 with Virtual Box on my laptop, > - rsync CentOS 8 root partition on /dev/md0p1, > - chroot in CentOS 8 root partition, > - configure /etc/mdadm.conf, grub.cfg, initramfs, install bootloader on > both sda and sdb drives. > > I think I can do first four of the above, but my CentOS installation > acts strange after rebooting the server. It recognizes the raid,...
2017 Jul 14
0
[PATCH 06/27] daemon: Add unit tests of the ‘Utils’ module.
...+let () = + assert (split_device_partition "/dev/sda1" = ("sda", 1)); + assert (split_device_partition "/dev/sdb" = ("sdb", 0)); + assert (split_device_partition "/dev/ubda9" = ("ubda", 9)); + assert (split_device_partition "/dev/md0p1" = ("md0", 1)) + (* XXX The function is buggy: + assert (split_device_partition "/dev/md0" = ("md0", 0)) *) + +(* Test proc_unmangle_path. *) +let () = + assert (proc_unmangle_path "\\040" = " "); + assert (proc_unmangle_path "\\040\\0...
2023 Jan 06
2
Looking for a RAID1 box
Once upon a time, Simon Matter <simon.matter at invoca.ch> said: > Are you sure that's still true? I've done it that way in the past but it > seems at least with EL8 you can put /boot/efi on md raid1 with metadata > format 1.0. That way the EFI firmware will see it as two independent FAT > filesystems. Only thing you have to be sure is that nothing ever writes to >
2017 Jun 03
12
[PATCH v2 00/12] Allow APIs to be implemented in OCaml.
Version 1 was here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00003.html This patch series reimplements a few more APIs in OCaml, including some very important core APIs like ?list_filesystems? and ?mount?. All the tests pass after this. The selection of APIs that I have moved may look a little random, but in fact they are all APIs consumed by the inspection code (and some more
2017 Jun 05
19
[PATCH v3 00/19] Allow APIs to be implemented in OCaml.
v2 was here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00008.html This series gets as far as a working (and faster) reimplementation of ‘guestfs_list_filesystems’. I also have another patch series on top of this one which reimplements the inspection APIs inside the daemon, but that needs a bit more work still, since inspection turns out to be a very large piece of code. Rich.
2017 Jul 27
23
[PATCH v3 00/23] Reimplement many daemon APIs in OCaml.
I think this fixes everything mentioned: - Added the Optgroups module as suggested. - Remove command temporary files. - Replace command ~flags with ?fold_stdout_on_stderr. - Nest _with_mounted function. - Rebase & retest. Rich.
2017 Jul 21
27
[PATCH v2 00/23] Reimplement many daemon APIs in OCaml.
v1 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00098.html This series now depends on two small patches which I posted separately: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00207.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00209.html v1 -> v2: - Previously changes to generator/daemon.ml were made incrementally through the patch
2017 Jul 14
45
[PATCH 00/27] Reimplement many daemon APIs in OCaml.
Previously posted as part of the mega utilities/inspection series here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00232.html What I've done is to extract just the parts related to rewriting daemon APIs in OCaml, rebase them on top of the current master, fix a few things, and recompile and test everything. Rich.
2017 Jun 12
32
[PATCH v5 00/32] Refactor utilities, implement some APIs in OCaml.
This is a combination of: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00046.html [PATCH 00/12] Refactor utility functions. plus: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00023.html [PATCH v3 00/19] Allow APIs to be implemented in OCaml. with the second patches rebased on top of the utility refactoring, and some other adjustments and extensions. This passes
2017 Jun 19
29
[PATCH v7 00/29] Reimplement inspection in the daemon.
v6 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00103.html and this requires the utilities refactoring posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html Inspection is now complete[*], although not very well tested. I'm intending to compare the output of many guests using old & new virt-inspector to see if I can find any
2017 Jun 15
45
[PATCH v6 00/41] Refactor utilities, reimplement inspection in the daemon.
v5: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00065.html Since v5, this now implements inspection almost completely for Linux and Windows guests. Rich.
2017 Jun 21
45
[PATCH v8 00/42] Refactor utilities and reimplement inspection.
v7 was: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00184.html I believe this addresses all comments received so far. Also it now passes a test where I compared about 100 disk images processed with old and new virt-inspector binaries. The output is identical in all cases except one which is caused by a bug in blkid