search for: mcwhulf

...ldly disconcerted by the (possibly undocumented?) changes in the way certain things are handled. At this point I'd just like to ask the community if anyone's successfully done Samba 3.x as PDC with ldap backend and has any advice / suggestions / pointers? Thanks for your help, -- Cybr0t McWhulf

Software: OS: Redhat 9 Samba Ver: Samba 3.0.0 (Plus excel writelock patch, waiting for 3.0.2!) OpenLDAP Ver: 2.0.27-8 Just a quick question about PDC / BDC interaction, my plan is to distribute Samba (with slave ldap backend) BDCs to remote facilities, as well as have one on each network segment in the hopes of avoiding unnecessary nmb broadcast traffic. My question is this: Will the PDC /

...me. I'm extremely pleased with 3.0.x's stability, I don't think local segment failover is really going to be a huge issue. Keep up the great work :) -- Cy > > > > Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 18:14:36 +1100 > From: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> > To: Cybr0t McWhulf <cybre@killcybre.org> > Cc: abartlet@samba.org, samba@lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: [Samba] PDC/BDC Questions > > On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 15:11, Cybr0t McWhulf wrote: > > Sorry, that was a bit vague, my apologies. > > > > My real question is, in the event where ne...

...ot ever change, resulting in the ever-unfun activity of tracking people down and berating them until they change it (This was hard enough the first two times). Any suggestions or advice would be greatly appreciated, and as always great thanks to the Samba team for their terrific work. -- Cybr0t McWhulf

...on pdbedit is going towards? it would be quite nifty to have a single command to edit (or generate) domain policies. It seemed to work with altering the minimum password length, but it only goes so far. Any suggestions / advice / heckling if I'm being an idiot would be appreciated -- Cybr0t McWhulf

...bout "domain admin group"? :( ) I'm really just looking for some decent-recent (nearly idiot proof ;) ) instructions on how to accomplish this. Thanks alot to anyone able to help, "life saver" isn't the right term, but it's the first that comes to mind. -- Cybr0t McWhulf

...John H Terpstra <jht@samba.org> Envoy? par : Pour : Cybr0t McWhulf <cybre@killcybre.org> samba-bounces+stephane.purnelle=corman.be@lists cc : samba@lists.samba.org .samba.org Objet : Re:...

...ix/linux machines. Granted, that's a pretty tall order, as to the best of my understanding the samba ldap attributes are highly dependant on the posix attributes. Thanks for your help folks, and constant thanks to the Samba team for saving me the torture of dealing with Windows :) -- Cybr0t McWhulf

Basically, have an old IVR application running under Apex's Omnivox software on a box with 4 old intel dialogic D240SCs, and would like to allow remote clients to gain access to aforementioned IVR application via softphone, 7960, ata, etc via asterisk with a TE410P. Unfortunately, all I know about the dialogics is that they're configured for D4/AMI, which I believe I have configured right

OS / Software: PDC / Master LDAP store: - Redhat 9 - OpenLDAP 2.1.25 - Samba 3.0.0 BDC / Slave LDAP store: - Redat 9 - OpenLDAP 2.0.27-8 - Samba 3.0.2 >From the Samba HOWTO Collection on www.samba.org: (Backup Domain Control) "Can I Do This All with LDAP? The simple answer is yes. Samba's pdb_ldap code supports binding to a replica LDAP server, and will also follow

Software: OS: RedHat 9 SMB Ver: 3.0.0(+excel patch) OpenLDAP Ver: 2.0.27-8 (backend) I've noticed that when using ext3+acls when viewing permissions from a windows client, there will be two additional attributes, "CREATOR USER" and "CREATOR GROUP". Is this something from the translation between ext3acls -> windows? Not a big deal, just curious if I'm the