search for: mcwhinnie

We are seeing some performance issues runnig on 64-bit Linux. Running against a raw partition we can get 100MB/s write speed when creating a datafile. Using OCFS we get 30-40MB/s and at times it is so slow it is hard to measure. Anyone else see these issues? We are running the latest versions of both Oracle and OCFS. I've opened a ticket with Oracle but am interested in other's

We are seeing these messages in our system log. any idea what they might be? Unfortunately I'm not sure what was happening at the time. Oct 26 12:57:39 houided003 kernel: (13996) ERROR: status = -999, Common/ocfsgendlm.c, 1304 Oct 26 12:57:39 houided003 kernel: (13996) ERROR: status = -999, Common/ocfsgendlm.c, 1501 Oct 26 12:57:39 houided003 kernel: (13996) ERROR: status = -999,

...k you for your help. Athos10. PS: If you have an idea, it will be very welcome. Original message: --------------- From:"Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com> To:Michael Aubertin <maubertin@ares.fr> Cc:Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>, s_wendy_cheng@hotmail.com, David McWhinnie <davidmcwhinnie@yahoo.com>, jean-yves.bocahu@hp.com, igaste@ares.fr, a.brunel@ilius.net, ocfs-users@oss.oracle.com, ocfs-devel@oss.oracle.com, Stephen Tweedie <sct@redhat.com> Hi, On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 22:08, Michael Aubertin wrote: > Hello, i write to you to having your opinion and...

...k you for your help. Athos10. PS: If you have an idea, it will be very welcome. Original message: --------------- From:"Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com> To:Michael Aubertin <maubertin@ares.fr> Cc:Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>, s_wendy_cheng@hotmail.com, David McWhinnie <davidmcwhinnie@yahoo.com>, jean-yves.bocahu@hp.com, igaste@ares.fr, a.brunel@ilius.net, ocfs-users@oss.oracle.com, ocfs-devel@oss.oracle.com, Stephen Tweedie <sct@redhat.com> Hi, On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 22:08, Michael Aubertin wrote: > Hello, i write to you to having your opinion and...

Hi all, I curently have a big problem. One request (listed above) using context take up to 1000 more time than the on RAW or ext2 database. I have ran this request on a single IA32 machine with Redhat and dbf on ext2. The average reponse time is less than a sec. The same request on RAC 4 nodes cluster on RAW take the same average time. On ext2 idem. But on OCFS it took up to 15 sec randomly

Hi all, I curently have a big problem. One request (listed above) using context take up to 1000 more time than the on RAW or ext2 database. I have ran this request on a single IA32 machine with Redhat and dbf on ext2. The average reponse time is less than a sec. The same request on RAC 4 nodes cluster on RAW take the same average time. On ext2 idem. But on OCFS it took up to 15 sec randomly

Hi All, we are using Red Hat 2.1 Kernel e38 along with MSA 1000. ocfs version being used is $ rpm -qa | grep ocfs ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1 ocfs-2.4.9-e-enterprise-1.0.12-1 ocfs-support-1.0.10-1 Database Version is 9.2.0.5 However we find that the performance of the database on OCFS is too slow. even a select count(1) from all_tables takes like a while to complete. We initially assumed RAC is

Are there any known issues with using a split mirror of the OCFS partitions for backups? One option we are looking at is as follows: 1. Put tablespace in backup mode. 2. Split the mirror at the SAN level. 3. end tablespace backup mode. 4. mount the OCFS mirror under a different mount point. 5. backup the files on the OCFS mirror using RMAN. The question is how feasibile it is for step #4 to