Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "mcpar".
Did you mean:
mcpan
1998 Jun 17
3
bug in functions of form "mcpar<-"
This fairly harmless looking piece of code, which worked in
0.61 (and in S-PLUS) fails in 0.62.1.
R> "mcpar<-" <- function(x,mcpar) {attr(x,"mcpar") <- mcpar; x}
R> mcpar(x) <- c(1,100,1)
Error in mcpar<-(*tmp*, value = c(1, 100, 1)) : unused argument to function
The error message gives a hint about how to work around the problem -
just replace the argument "mcpar&q...
2007 Aug 07
1
bayesm - question about 'rscaleUsage function'
Hi all,
I have managed to get the r-scale usage algorithm to work, but I need to obtain the final results from this. As I understand it, this code is designed to generate a matrix after processing and store it somewhere?????
Here is the code.....
I get this part of the code, it all makes sense.
##
if(nchar(Sys.getenv("LONG_TEST")) != 0) {R=1000} else {R=5}
{
data(customerSat)
2006 Feb 10
1
mcmcsamp shortening variable names; how can i turn this feature off?
...s. For example:
> set.seed (1)
> group <- rep (1:5,10)
> a <- rnorm (5,-3,3)
> y <- rnorm (50, a[group], 2)
> fit <- lmer (y ~ 1 + (1 | group))
> mcmcsamp(fit)
(Intercept) log(sigma^2) log(grop.(In))
[1,] -2.771979 0.6909418 1.750876
attr(,"mcpar")
[1] 1 1 1
attr(,"class")
[1] "mcmc"
I want "grop" in the above output to be "group", and I want "(In)" to be
"(Intercept)". For my purposes (fitting models in general settings) it
is important to have descriptive variable names...
2006 Jan 28
1
yet another lmer question
...102 2.755102
2 0.616483 3.640738
I can't figure out why everything is rounded for the first model but not
for the second. Also, mcmcsamp() works for M1 but not for M2:
> mcmcsamp(M1)
(Intercept) log(sigma^2) log(grop.(In))
[1,] 9.099073 0.5711817 3.246981
attr(,"mcpar")
[1] 1 1 1
attr(,"class")
[1] "mcmc"
> mcmcsamp(M2)
Error: inconsistent degrees of freedom and dimension
Error in t(.Call("mer_MCMCsamp", object, saveb, n, trans, PACKAGE =
"Matrix")) :
unable to find the argument 'x' in selecting...
2005 Aug 17
4
How to assess significance of random effect in lme4
Dear All,
With kind help from several friends on the list, I am getting close.
Now here are something interesting I just realized: for random
effects, lmer reports standard deviation instead of standard error! Is
there a hidden option that tells lmer to report standard error of
random effects, like most other multilevel or mixed modeling software,
so that we can say something like "randome