search for: mcmarkup

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "mcmarkup".

Did you mean: markup
2013 Sep 30
1
[LLVMdev] RFC: llvm-shlib-test (Was: [llvm] r191029 - llvm-c: Make LLVMGetFirstTarget a proper prototype)
Attached is what I got thus far. What I'm struggling with is proper integration in build system. What is in there is just wild guesses from my side, both on autoconf and cmake variants. It would be great if someone with proper knowledge of the buildsystems could have a look. Also I'm not sure how to properly handle compilation on msvc - clearly "-std=c11 -Wstrict-prototypes" is
2015 Jul 29
1
[LLVMdev] Error when i am using command make -j4 command in cygwin to compile safecode
...======= Finished Linking Release+Asserts Executable llvm-size (without symbols) make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/NIKHILREDDY/WORK/LLVM_OBJ/tools/llvm-size' llvm[2]: Compiling llvm-cov.cpp for Release+Asserts build make[2]: Entering directory '/home/NIKHILREDDY/WORK/LLVM_OBJ/tools/llvm-mcmarkup' llvm[2]: Compiling llvm-mcmarkup.cpp for Release+Asserts build llvm[2]: Linking Release+Asserts executable llvm-cov (without symbols) llvm[2]: ======= Finished Linking Release+Asserts Executable llvm-readobj (without symbols) make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/NIKHILREDDY/WORK/LLVM_OBJ/tool...
2017 Dec 04
5
[RFC] - Deduplication of debug information in linkers (LLD).
Thanks for providing the experimental data! It clearly shows the value of type sections in DWARF. Regarding why type sections are off by default, aside from the issue of consumers needing to understand them, there is a size penalty to type sections that becomes more evident in smaller projects (meaning, fewer compilation units). The size penalty can be balanced against the amount of
2016 Mar 17
2
Building with LLVM_PARALLEL_XXX_JOBS
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 5:30 PM, Chris Bieneman <cbieneman at apple.com> wrote: [ brutal-snip ] ... > [ TODO#S: Before doing a 2nd build (and in a 3rd run using more > optimized binaries) ] > > How do I anable LTO via CMAKE? > > > LLVM_ENALBLE_LTO=On > [ v4 of my build-script attached ] Hi Chris, thanks for the response! That seems to work (see below). $ cd
2017 Feb 11
2
Asan self host problems: Failed to deallocate
Trying to run a self host "ninja check-clang" with ASan enabled I hit a /lot/ of errors like this (strangely I hit none of these in check-llvm, only in check-clang): Any ideas? ==10525==ERROR: AddressSanitizer failed to deallocate 0x10800 (67584) bytes at address 0x631000014800 ==10525==AddressSanitizer CHECK failed:
2017 Feb 15
2
Asan self host problems: Failed to deallocate
..._TOOL_LLVM_JITLISTENER_BUILD:BOOL=ON //Whether to build llvm-link as part of LLVM LLVM_TOOL_LLVM_LINK_BUILD:BOOL=ON //Whether to build llvm-lto2 as part of LLVM LLVM_TOOL_LLVM_LTO2_BUILD:BOOL=ON //Whether to build llvm-lto as part of LLVM LLVM_TOOL_LLVM_LTO_BUILD:BOOL=ON //Whether to build llvm-mcmarkup as part of LLVM LLVM_TOOL_LLVM_MCMARKUP_BUILD:BOOL=ON //Whether to build llvm-mc as part of LLVM LLVM_TOOL_LLVM_MC_BUILD:BOOL=ON //Whether to build llvm-mc-fuzzer as part of LLVM LLVM_TOOL_LLVM_MC_FUZZER_BUILD:BOOL=ON //Whether to build llvm-modextract as part of LLVM LLVM_TOOL_LLVM_MODEXTRACT_B...