Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "mcdowella".
Did you mean:
mcdowell
2001 Jul 01
1
(PR#1007) ks.test doesn't compute correct empirical
On Sun, 1 Jul 2001 mcdowella@mcdowella.demon.co.uk wrote:
> Full_Name: Andrew Grant McDowell
> Version: R 1.1.1 (but source in 1.3.0 looks fishy as well)
> OS: Windows 2K Professional (Consumer)
> Submission from: (NULL) (194.222.243.209)
Please upgrade: we've found a number of Win2k bugs and worked around th...
2001 Jul 03
0
(PR#1007) ks.test doesn't compute correct empirical distribution if there are ties in the data
In message <Pine.GSO.4.31.0107010731110.7616-100000@auk.stats>, Prof
Brian D Ripley <ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk> writes
>
>You do realize that the Kolmogorov tests (and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov
>extension) assume continuous distributions, so the distribution theory
>is not valid in this case?
>
>S-PLUS does stop you doing this:
>
>> ks.gof(o,
2001 Jul 01
0
ks.test doesn't compute correct empirical distribution if there are ties in the data (PR#1007)
Full_Name: Andrew Grant McDowell
Version: R 1.1.1 (but source in 1.3.0 looks fishy as well)
OS: Windows 2K Professional (Consumer)
Submission from: (NULL) (194.222.243.209)
In article <xeQ_6.1949$xd.353840@typhoon.snet.net>,
johnt@tman.dnsalias.com writes
>Can someone help? In R, I am generating a vector of 1000 samples from
>Bin (1000, 0.25). I then do a Kolmogorov Smirnov test