search for: mcdowel

We''re excited to let you know that Timothy Mcdowell has invited you to Dropbox! Timothy Mcdowell has been using Dropbox to sync and share files online and across computers, and thought you might want it too. Visit http://www.dropbox.com/link/20.ftpgPVIkHP/NjY5MjU5ODU3 to get started. - The Dropbox Team __________________________________________...

...23 10:09:37.98: [ 3638]: MODEM <Empty line> Feb 23 10:09:37.98: [ 3638]: MODEM TIMEOUT: waiting for v.21 carrier Two questions - 1) Does anyone know what step I missed here? (I.e. please help!) 2) Is there a document I should be working off of? Google doesn't seem to think so... Bob McDowell

The owner of my company just asked me for an Asterisk brochure. Has anyone seen such a creature? I know of some really informative websites, but I think a pdf would be priceless at this point. Thanks, Bob McDowell EMAIL PRIVELEGED & CONFIDENTIAL CLIENT COMMUNICATION    *** PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL CLIENT COMMUNICATION *** This e-mail message and all attachments, if any, may contain confidential and privileged material and are intended only for the intended recipient.  Any unauthorized review, u...

...2:58 PM To: rsync at lists.samba.org Subject: Re: modification times questions If you are sure the content is correct you can run rsync with both --times and --size-only. This will cause rsync to "fix" the timestamps on files that are the same size on both ends. On 04/07/2017 02:53 PM, McDowell, Blake via rsync wrote: > How do I transfer just the modification times with rsync? I now the file > content is the same but the modification times are different. Is there a > way to do this? Every way that I have tried causes the whole file to > transfer as well. > > Thanks >...

...ill never complete a file that was partially >copied since the partial copy is newer that the source file. > >OTOH, are you using rsync to copy files to a tape drive? If so then I >would think rsync is not the right tool for dealing with linear storage. > >On 06/02/2016 06:25 PM, McDowell, Blake wrote: >> OK. Thanks. Where can I find information regarding how to interpret >> —itemize-changes? >> >> The timestamps aren’t changing, so the target must not be storing them, >> which I have no idea why. The directory I’m writing to is 777. >> >&gt...

...he same version. I''m reasonably confident that they are, but... A) Can I get more detail about the error from some sort of log? B) Can I override the version numbering information (safely)? C) Could I export my pool configuration and do a fresh install of the pool master? Thanks! Bob McDowell _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

...ormal button presses on the keypad. You can use the phone's 'touch tones' feature to send data to the box, but that is a bit cumbersome. My Norstar voicemail system (that is being replaced) does not have this limitation. Is there anything I can do on the Asterisk side? Thanks, Bob McDowell    *** PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL CLIENT COMMUNICATION *** This e-mail message and all attachments, if any, may contain confidential and privileged material and are intended only for the intended recipient.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited....

...f of kmk at sanitarium.net> wrote: >It is saying the timestamp is wrong and that it is copying the file and >changing the timestamp. If it does that every time then either the >timestamps are changing on the source or the target isn't storing them. > >On 06/02/2016 06:13 PM, McDowell, Blake wrote: >> Thanks Kevin! I¹m unclear how to read the ‹itemize-changes output. Can >>you >> provide some insight? >> >> This is a local transfer from an external drive to an internal drive all >> attached to one computer. >> >> >> rsync...

...The sound card, by the way, exists for overhead paging purposes. My questions are: 1) Is there a document I should be aware of? 2) Has anyone else resolved this sort of problem before? 3) Do I need to scrap the sound card and use an FX(O) device? If so, how do I get my sound back? Thanks, Bob McDowell    *** PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL CLIENT COMMUNICATION *** This e-mail message and all attachments, if any, may contain confidential and privileged material and are intended only for the intended recipient.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited....

...et> wrote: >Instead of the second -v (or even the first) add --itemize-changes. It >will tell you why each file is being copied. If the file timestamps are >not correct then perhaps the underlying storage doesn't allow arbitrary >mtime changes. > >On 06/02/2016 05:23 PM, McDowell, Blake wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> >> At my work we use rsync to move files between drives and to LTO among >> other things. >> >> >> >> I¹m having an issue using rsync to move material between and external >> drive and an intern...

While I'm thinking about it, is anyone else out there using podget or something similar to do news/weather playback? It's a neat idea, and I'd like to showcase it as a feature that the old Nortel just didn't even come close to doing... Thanks, Bob McDowell

Rsync only cares about the modification time. The ls command usually abbreviates the timestamp so it is better to use the stat command on one of the problem files to see the full thing. On 06/02/2016 06:42 PM, McDowell, Blake wrote: > Cool Thanks! > > Specifically, the timestamps on both <src> and <dest> match for "ls -l" > but do not match for "ls -lu" or "ls -lc” > > The storage is just an regular HDD in a mac pro tower. I can’t imagine why > it would...

...9;service asterisk stop' about a dozen times, and it stops. 7) Death-loop resumes when starting asterisk with either method 8) After a reboot, things are normal again Weird, eh? It's not critical, but if you've seen it before I'd love to know what you found to be causing it. Bob McDowell    *** PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL CLIENT COMMUNICATION *** This e-mail message and all attachments, if any, may contain confidential and privileged material and are intended only for the intended recipient.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.  If you a...

...Partial means don't delete the incomplete file. The file is being transferred because it doesn't match. But rsync does delta-transfers so it won't actually transfer the parts that match. It will just verify that they do match. Unless of course --whole-file. On 06/24/2016 11:47 AM, McDowell, Blake wrote: > Hello, > > > > I’m running rsync -avPhi to move large video files to a remote server. > Often we have to stop a transfer midway through to push something > else to the server. My hope was that the -P flag would invoke > --partial and the transfer woul...

Hi David, it's a shot in the dark, but it might be worth trying lpxelinux.0 [1] (instead of pxelinux.0) which contains the newer network stack before falling back to older versions of syslinux. On Fri, 2 Feb 2018 10:42:27 -0500 David McDowell via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > Looks like 4.07 was latest stable 4.xx release? thanks. I believe so. According to the changelog, syslinux version 5.10 made a big network stack change which I believe is affecting you. So you could also give 5.01 a try. Good luck Lukas...

Hi David, On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 18:09:51 -0500 David McDowell via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > Thanks for the suggestion Lukas. Is lpxelinux.0 [1] a fork of this > distro or a completely different open source option? The file is part of syslinux (pxelinux) and exists since version 5.10. So neither a fork nor a different project ;)...

...wxrwxrwx 24,839,552 2016/05/27 14:00:57 BWAG_R2_00130798.dpx I¹m running version 3.1.2 protocol 31. Thanks, Blake On 6/2/16, 7:26 PM, "rsync on behalf of Steven Levine" <rsync-bounces at lists.samba.org on behalf of steve53 at earthlink.net> wrote: >In <D3762D63.17A7%mcdowellh at si.edu>, on 06/02/16 > at 10:42 PM, "McDowell, Blake" <McDowellH at si.edu> said: > >Hi Blake, > >>The storage is just an regular HDD in a mac pro tower. I can t imagine >>why it wouldn t handle timestamps. Also of note - this problem doesn t >&g...

...g data to a remote server so I assume you are using a network mount of some kind to make it a local copy instead of letting rsync do the networking. Anyways, if rsync isn't doing the networking then forcing it to do a delta transfer would only make it take even longer. On 06/24/2016 02:59 PM, McDowell, Blake wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > I haven't specified --whole-file. After entering an rsync command the terminal always reads "delta-transmission disabled for local transfer or --whole-file" but I assume that is just a standard phrase that always appears. > > So, if I a...

How do I transfer just the modification times with rsync? I now the file content is the same but the modification times are different. Is there a way to do this? Every way that I have tried causes the whole file to transfer as well. Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

That isn't how rsync should work with -a. Is something preventing it from backdating the file? What is the filesystem? Can you try copying your 2015 file with cp -a? On 10/9/24 14:56, McDowell, Blake wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > The -a flag in this instance is not back-dating the timestamp of the > copied file to the source file. It is modifying it to the time of > transfer and leaving it that way. Then any time I rerun that command it > always updates the timestamp sinc...