search for: mccat

...MultiSource/Benchmarks/tramp3d-v4/tramp3d-v4 | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/NPB-serial/is/is | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Bullet/bullet | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/03-testtrie/testtrie | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/12-IOtest/iotest | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/05-eks/eks | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/18-imp/imp...

...s-C/miniAMR/miniAMR.test | 11.73 | 11.75 | 18.20 | 18.20 | |MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/neural/neural.test | 7.20 | 7.29 | 8.15 | 8.15 | |MultiSource/Benchmarks/DOE-ProxyApps-C++/PENNANT/PENNANT.test | 5.78 | 5.91 | 6.35 | 6.35 | |MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/18-imp/imp.test | 5.30 | 5.24 | 2.73 | 2.73 | |MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/network-dijkstra/network-dijkstra.| 4.41 | 3.85 | 0 | 0 | |SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/oourafft.test | 3.50 | 3.46 | 3.58 | 3.58 | |MultiSource/Appl...

...0.0149 -14.367816091954 Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/shapes/shapes 0.0007 0.0006 -14.285714285714 Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/bison/mybison 0.0021 0.0018 -14.285714285714 Benchmarks/TSVC/Symbolics-dbl/Symbolics-dbl 2.1248 1.8634 -12.302334337349 Benchmarks/McCat/03-testtrie/testtrie 0.0092 0.0081 -11.956521739130 Applications/treecc/treecc 0.0009 0.0008 -11.111111111111 Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/cdecl/cdecl 0.0009 0.0008 -11.111111111111 Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-flt/NodeSplit 2.3019 2...

....08 0.98 * 3.16 | 0.92 1.01 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/gs/gs | 2.4592 533088 2.5566 * 1.1136 | 0.09 0.10 0.10 * 1.39 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/01-qbsort/qbsort | 0.0221 4284 0.0243 * 0.0235 | 0.14 0.14 0.14 * 0.16 | 1.00 1.00 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/03-testtrie/testtrie | 0.0427 5496 0.0319 *...

....40 1.30 * 4.14 | 0.90 0.97 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/gs/gs | 2.6441 543980 3.1401 * 1.3720 | 0.14 0.16 0.14 * 1.67 | 0.88 1.00 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/01-qbsort/qbsort | 0.0200 4260 0.0320 * 0.0240 | 0.18 0.16 0.14 * 0.21 | 1.12 1.29 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/03-testtrie/testtrie | 0.0360 4616 0.0360 *...

Andy and I briefly discussed this the other day, we have not yet got chance to list a detailed pass order for the pre- and post- IPO scalar optimizations. This is wish-list in our mind: pre-IPO: based on the ordering he propose, get rid of the inlining (or just inline tiny func), get rid of all loop xforms... post-IPO: get rid of inlining, or maybe we still need it, only

LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When

....19 1.19 * 3.28 | 0.99 0.99 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/gs/gs | 1.9621 545168 2.1844 * 0.9437 | 0.10 0.10 0.11 * 1.26 | 1.00 0.91 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/01-qbsort/qbsort | 0.0211 4268 0.0229 * 0.0233 | 0.34 0.32 0.32 * 0.36 | 1.06 1.06 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/03-testtrie/testtrie | 0.0348 5952 0.0371 *...

....58 0.55 * 1.68 | 0.95 1.00 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/gs/gs | 0.9774 544072 1.1667 * * | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.30 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/01-qbsort/qbsort | 0.0097 4412 0.0272 * 0.0124 | 0.11 0.11 0.10 * 0.13 | 1.00 1.10 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/03-testtrie/testtrie | 0.0144 5880 0.0165 *...

...ce/Applications/Burg/burg.execution_time (1 of 1104) FAIL: MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan.execution_time (2 of 1104) FAIL: MultiSource/Applications/lemon/lemon.execution_time (3 of 1104) FAIL: MultiSource/Applications/sqlite3/sqlite3.execution_time (4 of 1104) FAIL: MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/12-IOtest/iotest.execution_time (5 of 1104) FAIL: MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/automotive-bitcount/automotive-bitcount.execution_time (6 of 1104) FAIL: MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-FFT/telecomm-fft.execution_time (7 of 1104) FAIL: MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/anagram/anagram.executio...

...widths > 128 not implemented yet"' failed. > MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/gs/gs                                 | > 1.2000 376224   1.7600      *                0.7900      |    0.07 * >  0.06 *           0.95 | n/a     -       n/a          n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/01-qbsort/qbsort                            | > 0.0099 3600     0.0200      *                0.0300      |    0.07    0.06 >  0.05 *           0.10 | -       -       n/a          n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/03-testtrie/testtrie                        | > 0.0200 3756     0.0100  ...

Hi Tanya, > 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects > directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a > pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories. Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu. > 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note > that you need to

.../BenchmarkGame/puzzle > +10.0% SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/heapsort > +10.5% MultiSource/Benchmarks/Trimaran/enc-3des/enc-3des > +10.9% SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/heapsort > +11.7% MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/bc/bc > +12.0% MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/17-bintr/bintr > +55.2% SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/methcall Yikes! Do we know why these codes got so much worse? Even 5% is a big deal on x86. -Dave

Hi Renato, I've investigated a few of these for AArch64 recently, and some of the results will be applicable in the 32-bit world too. > MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/12-IOtest/iotest.execution_time This is because of disagreement between ABIs over whether "char" is signed. ARM says no, x86 says yes. > MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/automotive-bitcount/automotive-bitcount.execution_time This is also failing on x86, I think (http://lab.llvm.org:80...

...implemented yet"' failed. > MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/gs/ > gs | 1.2000 376224 1.7600 > * 0.7900 | 0.07 * 0.06 * > 0.95 | n/a - n/a n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/01-qbsort/ > qbsort | 0.0099 3600 0.0200 > * 0.0300 | 0.07 0.06 0.05 * > 0.10 | - - n/a n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/03-testtrie/ > testtrie | 0.0200 375...

...iSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/pifft/Output/pifft -1.9% External/SPEC/CFP2006/447.dealII/Output/447.dealII -1.9% External/SPEC/CINT2006/401.bzip2/Output/401.bzip2 -1.9% External/SPEC/CINT2006/464.h264ref/Output/464.h264ref -1.9% MultiSource/Applications/SPASS/Output/SPASS -1.8% MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/18-imp/Output/imp -1.8% External/SPEC/CFP2006/444.namd/Output/444.namd -1.8% MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/unix-smail/Output/unix-smail -1.8% MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/espresso/Output/espresso -1.7% MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/gs/Output/gs -1.7% MultiSource/Applications/sqlite3/...

LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download

LLVMers, 2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community. http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. To test llvm-gcc: 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre- compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. 2) Run make check,

...compile=on> > 1.82% 0.2971 0.3025 0.0009 > MultiSource/Applications/treecc/treecc.compile > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/380/graph?pset.0=on&test.MultiSource%2FApplications%2Ftreecc%2Ftreecc.compile=on> > 1.81% 2.1455 2.1844 0.0035 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/17-bintr/bintr.compile > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/380/graph?pset.0=on&test.MultiSource%2FBenchmarks%2FMcCat%2F17-bintr%2Fbintr.compile=on> > 1.81% 0.0828 0.0843 0.0002 > External/SPEC/CINT2000/253_perlbmk/253_perlbmk.compile > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_def...

Hi Graham, Thank you for offering help. I am trying to create a reproducer. The problem is that the crashes happen whilst LTO is used. One thing I am sure about IR is broken at compile time. Thanks, Evgeny From: Graham Yiu <gyiu at ca.ibm.com> Date: Friday, 10 November 2017 at 16:09 To: Evgeny Astigeevich <Evgeny.Astigeevich at arm.com> Cc: "junbuml at codeaurora.org"