search for: mc0

After update from centos 6.6 to centos 6.7 and reboot it, I have get a lot of this error into /var/log/messages: > May??3 11:27:20 s-virt kernel: EDAC MC0: CE row 2, channel 1, label > "": (Branch=0 DRAM-Bank=2 RDWR=Read RAS=6093 CAS=896, CE Err=0x10000 > (Correctable Patrol Data ECC)) > May??3 11:27:21 s-virt kernel: EDAC MC0: CE row 2, channel 1, label > "": (Branch=0 DRAM-Bank=1 RDWR=Read RAS=1330 CAS=4, CE Err=0x20...

...ust to check, didn't find anything; and the box has been running for months before this without issue. I'm wondering if anyone has run across this before, and if so, if it was software (CentOS) or hardware (PowerEdge / PowerVault) related? Oct 8 12:19:35 someServer kernel: EDAC i5000 MC0: FATAL ERRORS Found!!! 1st FATAL Err Reg= 0x4 Oct 8 12:19:35 someServer kernel: EDAC i5000 MC0: >Tmid Thermal event with intelligent throttling disabled Oct 8 12:19:35 someServer kernel: EDAC MC0: UE row 1, channel-a= 2 channel-b= 3 labels "-": (Branch=1 DRAM-Bank=0 RDWR=Write...

...or I am having problem with the actual board. Thank you in advace. I am getting the following error via stdout and also in /var/log/messages Aug 15 20:37:10 saturn kernel: Northbridge Error, node 0 Aug 15 20:37:10 saturn kernel: ECC/ChipKill ECC error. Aug 15 20:37:10 saturn kernel: EDAC amd64 MC0: CE ERROR_ADDRESS= 0x1b9e740 Aug 15 20:37:10 saturn kernel: EDAC MC0: CE page 0x1b9e, offset 0x740, grain 0, syndrome 0x1cc8, row 2, channel 0, label "": amd64_edac Aug 15 20:37:10 saturn kernel: EDAC MC0: CE - no information available: amd64_edacError Overflow Aug 15 23:33:41 saturn kern...

Hi All, We have installed CentOS 5.3 x86_64 in an HP DL585 server with AMD Opteron 64 bit processor and 16 GB RAM. The kernel version is 2.6.18-128.el5 . Now this has thrown an error message in /var/log/message, Jul 3 21:41:11 db1 kernel: EDAC k8 MC0: general bus error: participating processor(local node origin), time-out(no timeout) memory transaction type(generic read), mem or i/o(mem access), cache level(generic) Jul 3 21:41:11 db1 kernel: EDAC MC0: CE page 0x65bc7, offset 0x6a0, grain 8, syndrome 0x6e1a, row 0, channel 0, label "&quot...

Hi, Thanks for your mail, and time It is not working for some arguments, when mean value is like >6. case mc0 <- c(0.08844446,0.1744455,0.1379778,0.1209769,0.1573065,0. 1134463,0.2074027) rv <-UnivarMixingDistribution(Norm(486.4255, 53.24133), Norm(664.0713, 3.674773), Norm(669.0484, 4.101381), Norm(677.1753...

Dear All, I have problem with CentOS 6 64bit, this screen monitor view below EDAC MC0 : UE row 0, channel-a= 0 channel-b= 1 labels "-" (Branch= 0 DRAM RAM Bank= 2 RDWR=Write RAS=14316 CAS=0 FATAL Err=0x4 (> Tmid Thermal event with intelligent throttling disabled )) but, now this server running very well. Maybe know the couse of error. Thank you very much before. -- h...

...box running Centos 5. It looks like some problems aroung AMD DRAM Memory controller. But what does it really mean b/c most of my AMD boxes has these messages in /var/log/messages. Please help. ... Aug 1 23:29:40 ccn128 kernel: EDAC MC: Ver: 2.0.1 Jun 12 2007 Aug 1 23:29:40 ccn128 kernel: EDAC MC0: Giving out device to k8_edac Athlon64/Opteron: DEV 0000:00:18.2 Aug 1 23:29:40 ccn128 kernel: EDAC MC1: Giving out device to k8_edac Athlon64/Opteron: DEV 0000:00:19.2 Jul 31 04:02:12 ccn128 kernel: EDAC k8 MC0: GART TLB errorr: transaction type(generic), cache level(generic) Jul 31 04:02:12 ccn1...

Hi, I updated a server yesterday from "kernel 2.6.18-128.7.1.el5xen" to "kernel 2.6.18-164.el5xen" After rebooting, my message log is flooded every second or so with this error messages: Oct 6 14:52:20 xenserver1 kernel: EDAC MC0: UE row 0, channel-a= 0 channel-b= 1 labels "-": NON-FATAL recoverable (Branch=0 DRAM-Bank=0 Buffer ID = 0 RDWR=Read RAS=0 CAS=0 NON-FATAL recovera ble Err=0x2000 (FB-DIMM Configuration Write error on first attempt)) and Oct 6 15:17:23 xenserver1 kernel: EDAC MC0: CE row 0, channel 0,...

...|block:harvest), data=beets2, REML=F) ma0 <- update(ma1, yy~.) ## 2) cl <- getCall(lgs) cl[["data"]] <- beets2 mb1 <- eval(cl) mb0 <- update(mb1, yy~.) mb0 ## 3) cl <- getCall(lgs) cl[["data"]] <- as.name("beets2") mc1 <- eval(cl) mc0 <- update(mc1, yy~.) mc0 } foo()

...iate your time on my problem > > I have posted this problem on > > > https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/299590/to-find-maxima-for-gaussian-mixture-model > > > The plot I am getting using UnivarMixingDistribution from distr package in > R > > code is > > mc0= c(0.1241933, 0.6329082 <06329%20082>, 0.2428986 <02428%20986>) > rv > <-UnivarMixingDistribution(Norm(506.8644,61.02859),Norm(672.8448,9.149168),Norm( > 829.902,74.84682), mixCoeff=mc0/sum(mc0)) > plot(rv, to.draw.arg="d") > > I want output around 672 in...

...print(paste0("The dnorm value for x is.: ", val)) sum_prob=sum_prob+val } sum_prob } The output is not correct. Since I check my data using* UnivarMixingDistribution* from distr package and according to this the max should lie somewhere between 600-800 Code I used to check mc0=c( 0.6329082,0.6329082,0.2428986) rv <-UnivarMixingDistribution(Norm(506.8644,61.02859),Norm(672.8448,9.149168),Norm( 829.902,74.84682), mixCoeff=mc0/sum(mc0)) plot(rv, to.draw.arg="d") Can someone please help how I can solve this problem? Thanks & Regards Niharika Singhal...

> On 26 Aug 2017, at 16:39, niharika singhal <niharikasinghal1990 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks for your mail, and time > > It is not working for some arguments, when mean value is like >6. > > > case > > mc0 <- c(0.08844446,0.1744455,0.1379778,0.1209769,0.1573065,0. > 1134463,0.2074027) > > rv <-UnivarMixingDistribution(Norm(486.4255, 53.24133), > > Norm(664.0713, 3.674773), > > Norm(669.0484, 4.101381), > >...

Hi List, I've been getting the following EDAC memory errors EDAC MC0: CE page 0xeb0dd, offset 0x0, grain 4096, syndrome 0x45, row 3, channel 0, label "": i82875p CE and from this seeing that these errors have been corrected. Checking cat /sys/devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/csrow3/ch0_ce_count gives me a count of 4 thus I now know that csrow3 - ch0 is the pro...

...#39;s all new as of a few months ago, and b) it's *fully* populated. The two things I need to figure out are a) *which* DIMM it is, and b) is it mirrored; if so, which *other* DIMM needs to come out until we get replacements from the OEM. Here's one of many, all identical, from dmesg: EDAC MC0: CE row 12, channel 1, label "": Corrected error (Branch=0, Channel 1), DRAM-Bank=2 RD RAS=8218 CAS=500, CE Err=0x10000, Syndrome=0x6cad8e02(Correctable Patrol Data ECC)) I see the Bank=2, so I assume that's the first riser board on the left; but I can't identify which of the fo...

I've got a production system running CentOS 4 that was rock solid until I upgraded from 2.6.9-55 to 2.6.9-78.0.13 (now running 2.6.9-89.0.11). The system now crashes intermittently after a few weeks. I finally caught the panic message : EDAC MC0: INTERNAL ERROR: channel-b out of range (4 >= 4) Kernel panic - not syncing: MC0: Uncorrected Error Looking at the kernel changelog, I see that EDAC support was added for the Intel 5000 chipset in 2.6.9-68.20.EL which this server runs. I'm trying to determine if this is a potential memory...

I started to receive this kind of messages a few days ago on one of my servers: Message from syslogd@ at Mon Apr 29 08:02:55 2013 ... server1 kernel: EDAC MC0: UE row 0, channel-a= 0 channel-b= 1 labels "-": (Branch=0 DRAM-Bank=0 RDWR=Read RAS=0 CAS=0, UE Err=0x2 (Aliased Uncorrectable Non-Mirrored Demand Data ECC)) I've never had ECC memory to fail on me before, so now I am wondering the following: * The server is running CentOS 5.7 and...

...5: 0MB EDAC amd64: MC: 6: 0MB 7: 0MB EDAC MC: DCT1 chip selects: EDAC amd64: MC: 0: 0MB 1: 0MB EDAC amd64: MC: 2: 2048MB 3: 2048MB EDAC amd64: MC: 4: 0MB 5: 0MB EDAC amd64: MC: 6: 0MB 7: 0MB EDAC amd64: using x8 syndromes. EDAC amd64: MCT channel count: 2 EDAC MC0: Giving out device to module amd64_edac controller F10h: DEV 0000:00:18.2 (INTERRUPT) EDAC amd64: DRAM ECC enabled. EDAC amd64: F10h detected (node 1). EDAC MC: DCT0 chip selects: EDAC amd64: MC: 0: 0MB 1: 0MB EDAC amd64: MC: 2: 2048MB 3: 2048MB EDAC amd64: MC: 4: 0MB 5: 0MB EDAC...

Initially reported to debian (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=810964), redirected here: With AMD Opteron 6xxx processors, half of the memory controllers are missing from /sys/devices/system/edac/mc Checked with single 6120 (dual memory controller) and twin 6344 (2x dual MC), other dual-module CPUs might be affected too. Booting plain Linux (3.2, 3.16, 4.1, 4.3), all memory

...;node=4745009&i=1>> wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> Thanks for your mail, and time > >> > >> It is not working for some arguments, when mean value is like >6. > >> > >> > >> case > >> > >> mc0 <- c(0.08844446,0.1744455,0.1379778,0.1209769,0.1573065,0. > >> 1134463,0.2074027) > >> > >> rv <-UnivarMixingDistribution(Norm(486.4255, 53.24133), > >> > >> Norm(664.0713, 3.674773), > >> > >>...

On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 04:33:38PM +0100, Gerald Galster wrote: > > After the above, it's no longer crashing, and my email client's "pending operations" have > > cleared. > > Does your server use ECC memory and if so, are there any errors logged (bitflip, ...)? > > Best regards, > Gerald I don't have the logs from that time them nor do I see any