Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "mboxcl2".
Did you mean:
mbox2
2015 Jun 06
6
Dovecot mbox & other programs
...at (described
at [1]) but I also want to access (and modify!) those mbox files which
are stored on server (and used by dovecot).
What is correct way to read those mboxes? From wiki page [1] I read that
I should ignore first message in mbox (which contains X-IMAPbase header)
and mbox file is in mboxcl2 format.
And what is correct way to modify that mbox file (which is used by
dovecot imap)? I would like to configure mutt on server to directly
access those mbox mailboxes without need to use imap protocol (over
localhost). It is possible without any data/message damage?
[1] - http://wiki2.dove...
2015 Jun 08
0
Dovecot mbox & other programs
...t I also want to access (and modify!) those mbox files which
> are stored on server (and used by dovecot).
>
> What is correct way to read those mboxes? From wiki page [1] I read that
> I should ignore first message in mbox (which contains X-IMAPbase header)
> and mbox file is in mboxcl2 format.
>
> And what is correct way to modify that mbox file (which is used by
> dovecot imap)? I would like to configure mutt on server to directly
> access those mbox mailboxes without need to use imap protocol (over
> localhost). It is possible without any data/message damage?...
2015 Jun 08
0
Dovecot mbox & other programs
...but I also want to access (and modify!) those
> mbox files which are stored on server (and used by dovecot).
>
> What is correct way to read those mboxes? From wiki page [1] I read
> that I should ignore first message in mbox (which contains
> X-IMAPbase header) and mbox file is in mboxcl2 format.
>
> And what is correct way to modify that mbox file (which is used by
> dovecot imap)? I would like to configure mutt on server to
> directly access those mbox mailboxes without need to use imap
> protocol (over localhost). It is possible without any data/message
> dama...
2008 May 27
2
mbox From escaping implementation ?
Hello,
I read in the wiki (http://wiki.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/mbox) about
"From Escaping":
"Dovecot doesn't currently do this escaping however. Instead it
prevents this confusion by adding Content-Length headers so it knows
later where the next message begins. Dovecot doesn't either remove the
'>' characters before sending the data to clients. Both of these
2008 Jan 29
2
Embedded From_ lines breaking Content-Length (and Dovecot)
I feel like I'm going totally crazy. Is it just me, or have embedded
From_ lines really been breaking mbox messages since (at least)
dovecot 1.0? I found a whole lot of broken messages in an old mailbox
of mine and when I looked closer at it, it seemed like Dovecot was
ignoring the Content-Length header and truncating the messages at the
first embedded From_ line instead. Figuring