search for: mblazetargetlow

Can someone explain how the condition code is passed from the MBlazeTargetLowering::LowerSELECT_CC to MBlazeTargetLowering::EmitCustomSelect custom inserter? In LowerSELECT_CC the condition code is never accessed (Op.GetOperand(4)) and I don't see how it ends up getting correctly passed to the MBlazeTargetLowering::EmitCustomSelect. > SDValue MBlazeTargetLowering...

...neric through your back end? That should give you some more test cases. Some "feature" tests can be found inside other directories as well, e.g. msp430 / systemz. Are you planning to add microblaze description to clang? C compiler can speed up testing alot :) More comments: >+SDValue MBlazeTargetLowering:: >+LowerDYNAMIC_STACKALLOC(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) { Do you really need this? Expanding dynamic allocas normally ends with stack register adjustment, you don't need anything special here. >+bool MBlazeTargetLowering:: >+SelectAddrRegReg(SDValue N, SDValue &Base, S...

...430 / systemz. > > Are you planning to add microblaze description to clang? C compiler > can speed up testing alot :) I already have a microblaze description in clang but I have not tested it as much so I have not submitted a patch for it yet. > > More comments: >> +SDValue MBlazeTargetLowering:: >> +LowerDYNAMIC_STACKALLOC(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) { > Do you really need this? Expanding dynamic allocas normally ends with > stack register adjustment, you don't need anything special here. I was unsure as to whether I needed this or not. I have been taking the...

...llc 0x00000001005df5f3 llvm::CCState::AnalyzeCallResult(llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::ISD::InputArg> const&, bool (*)(unsigned int, llvm::MVT, llvm::MVT, llvm::CCValAssign::LocInfo, llvm::ISD::ArgFlagsTy, llvm::CCState&)) + 261 8 llc 0x00000001000b62ac llvm::MBlazeTargetLowering::LowerCallResult(llvm::SDValue, llvm::SDValue, llvm::CallingConv::ID, bool, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::ISD::InputArg> const&, llvm::DebugLoc, llvm::SelectionDAG&, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::SDValue>&) const + 166 9 llc 0x00000001000b72c6 llvm::MBlazeTar...

Hi Josef, > Okay, I've done a lot more testing and I now have a .bc file that compiles for x86, sparc, mips but refuses to compile for the mblaze and powerPC backends because of the calling convention. Is there anyone that would know how to fix the microblaze calling convention or point me in the right direction on how to fix it? what does "refuses to compile" mean? I.e. what

On Jan 29, 2010, at 9:42 AM, Wesley Peck wrote: > I have been working on a LLVM backend for the MicroBlaze soft-processor: > http://www.xilinx.com/tools/microblaze.htm > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MicroBlaze Very Cool! > Attached is the initial MicroBlaze patch. It does the following: > 1. Adds mblaze as a target in configure and configure.ac > 2. Adds mblaze specific

I have been working on a LLVM backend for the MicroBlaze soft-processor: http://www.xilinx.com/tools/microblaze.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MicroBlaze Attached is the initial MicroBlaze patch. It does the following: 1. Adds mblaze as a target in configure and configure.ac 2. Adds mblaze specific intrinsics in include/llvm/IntrinsicsMBlaze.td and include/llvm/Intrinsics.td 3. Adds mblaze

...llc 0x00000001005df5f3 llvm::CCState::AnalyzeCallResult(llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::ISD::InputArg> const&, bool (*)(unsigned int, llvm::MVT, llvm::MVT, llvm::CCValAssign::LocInfo, llvm::ISD::ArgFlagsTy, llvm::CCState&)) + 261 8 llc 0x00000001000b62ac llvm::MBlazeTargetLowering::LowerCallResult(llvm::SDValue, llvm::SDValue, llvm::CallingConv::ID, bool, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::ISD::InputArg> const&, llvm::DebugLoc, llvm::SelectionDAG&, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::SDValue>&) const + 166 9 llc 0x00000001000b72c6 llvm::MBlazeTar...

Can you please post the code to split a MachineBasicBlock? I am trying to split a MachineBasicBlock at a specific instruction in the MBB, let us say, into MBB1 and MBB2. This instruction should go into MBB2. Also MBB1 should have an unconditional branch to MBB2 as the terminator. (quite similar to splitBasicBlock in BasicBlock.cpp) Meanwhile, I am trying to come up with a variant of