search for: mbabcock

Hello everyone, I have a problem regarding gre tunneling, I have two linux box both of them has a private network and the linux A is connected to the internet via wireless radio and the other linux B is connected to the internet via lease line. Here is the setup of my two linux box Linux A eth0 = 203.189.x.1 (internet) eth1 = 192.168.1.1 (going to hub private network) Linux B eth0 = 205.198.x.1

...haven't done any strict benchmarking yet, but -B65535 is faster than -B8192 which is much faster than -B16. PS again, I am not on this list, so please CC me any replies. -- Michael T. Babcock CTO, FibreSpeed Ltd. (Hosting, Security, Consultation, Database, etc) http://www.fibrespeed.net/~mbabcock/ -------------- next part -------------- diff -p -u openssh-3.0.2p1/scp.c openssh-3.0.2p1-mtb1/scp.c --- openssh-3.0.2p1/scp.c Sun Oct 21 20:53:59 2001 +++ openssh-3.0.2p1-mtb1/scp.c Tue Feb 5 11:18:46 2002 @@ -966,7 +966,7 @@ void usage() { (void) fprintf(stderr, - "usage: scp [-pqrv...

Hello, it seems, that filtering on nexthdr (TCP/UDP) content, especially src or dst port, is not working. The following has no effect on 2.4.16 or older (even 2.2) kernels: # tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 50 u32 match tcp dst 3128 0xffff police rate 40kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1 Even if # tc filter ls dev eth0 parent ffff: filter protocol ip pref 50 u32 filter protocol

Hi, for interested in participation on finishing new HTB developement I created simple docs regarding it. It is some insight into CBQ and HTB workings and problems. See luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/v3/

...ing easier to configure or follow if you leave the ''knobs'' on CBQ to their suggested defaults. Just my $0.02 worth (actually $1 in paid time to type this). -- Michael T. Babcock CTO, FibreSpeed Ltd. (Hosting, Security, Consultation, Database, etc) http://www.fibrespeed.net/~mbabcock/

...> key in version 3.0.2p1. The additional information can, however, be > used by more recent versions to select the correct line. PS, I am not subscribed to this list. -- Michael T. Babcock CTO, FibreSpeed Ltd. (Hosting, Security, Consultation, Database, etc) http://www.fibrespeed.net/~mbabcock/

PS, that patch, as should be obvious when viewed, is against the portable OpenSSH. I do not have any *BSD boxen so I can't test patches against unpatched OpenSSH. -- Michael T. Babcock CTO, FibreSpeed Ltd. (Hosting, Security, Consultation, Database, etc) http://www.fibrespeed.net/~mbabcock/

hi; I'm curious, is there a way, after i set up an admin ivr one needs a password to enter, to make for say option 7 for say give me current bandwith usage information? Let me tell you what i do now and you could give me your ideas. First of all i have a user, mbabcock that i ssh with, I'm using the latest of freepbx and right now how i get the status for me is typing vnstat and getting resolts like this: $ vnstat Database updated: Tue Oct 21 20:55:01 2008 eth0 received: 48.46 MB (87.3%) transmitted: 7.18 MB (12.7%) total: 5...

I downloaded the HTB and ESFQ packages and installled the patched kernel and tools. Now can someone give me an example how to configure my system so that the 512Kbit are fairly divided for each computer ? Assume that eth0 is the interface on the WAN side and eth1 on the LAN side. Thanks _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

...st line claiming there was an authentication failure? Any other information necessary can be easily providedm, but I'm not subscribed to this list so CC: me on replies. -- Michael T. Babcock CTO, FibreSpeed Ltd. (Hosting, Security, Consultation, Database, etc) http://www.fibrespeed.net/~mbabcock/

Hello there, i am continuing with the development of the iproute GUI. I was wondering if there is a xml parser for the set up of the queues. I have been searching but i cant find any... anyone?

Hello all! As far as I know that the traffic that will pass thru the router is balanced so that all connections have the same privilegies. Is it possible to configure the linux based router so that all computers will have the same privilegies? I mean that if in default case full traffic is splitted by connections, so I need to split it by users to prevent one user occupy all traffic by starting

...; e: 68 c3 06 00 00 push $0x6c3 Code; d08181e1 <[jbd]__journal_remove_journal_head+91/e0> 13: 68 00 00 00 00 push $0x0 4 warnings and 2 errors issued. Results may not be reliable. -- Michael T. Babcock C.T.O., FibreSpeed Ltd. http://www.fibrespeed.net/~mbabcock

While I''m thinking about that review of howto changes, here are a few other responses about things I don''t believe. I''ll be interested in more info if anyone has any. ==== [from new doc] Besides being classful, CBQ is also a shaper and it is in that aspect that it really doesn''t work very well. It should work like this. I''ve not noticed that it

Can someone tell me what concept I''m missing here. The setup is simple. I have two default routes after ifup operations. I use "ip route del" to remove one, but then decide to add it back. The attempt is refused. Why? # ip route ls 66.95.83.208/28 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 66.95.83.210 65.84.205.96/27 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 65.84.205.104

I have a dual-homed firewall. It has 2 Internet connections, provided by different ISPs (each with an associated IP address). The 2 Internet connections are connected to the same physical interface. The 2 Internet connections do NOT have equal bandwidth How do I configure the SNAT/MASQ and ensure sharing of the gateways with the correct ratio of usage and with the correct source IP address? I

Dear All! I reach the point that I must ask you what I have to do. I am beginner at traffic shaping and I''m very confused with it. :) Here''s my script that doesn''t do what I want to do with it: tc qdisc del dev eth1 root tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1 htb default 2 r2q 10 tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 300kbit tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:

Before I start, I don''t want to do ECMP or simple bonding ... I have multiple Internet connections available to multiple boxes on one of my networks. Box A connects to ISPs 1, 2 and 3 Box B connects to ISPs 1 and 4 Boxes A and B are both connected to each other and the rest of the network. 1) I would like to set up some dynamic routing in such a way that any given outgoing packet from

I have two servers on a network that need to intercommunicate a lot (file sharing and authentication information). I''d like to prioritise that traffic on them from their other network traffic, but I don''t want to think in terms of necessarily fixing bandwidths; I just want the inter-server communication to go out first if there''s a backlog. I could decide, I guess,