Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "maxstorespermemmove".
2011 Nov 14
1
[LLVMdev] PTX backend fatal error
Justin,
Add this to your TargetLowering constructor, this fixes the mem* issue.
maxStoresPerMemcpy = 4096;
maxStoresPerMemmove = 4096;
maxStoresPerMemset = 4096;
From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Justin Holewinski
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 7:12 AM
To: Alberto Magni
Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] PTX backend fatal error
On Mon, Nov 14, 201...
2011 Nov 14
0
[LLVMdev] PTX backend fatal error
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Alberto Magni <alberto.magni86 at gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I am testing the PTX backend using the OpenCL NVIDIA SDK benchmarks.
> Compiling the Histogram64.cl program I get a several backend errors.
>
> I isolated one of them in the following kernel program:
>
> __kernel void kernel_function(__global int *input) {
>
2011 Nov 14
2
[LLVMdev] PTX backend fatal error
Hi everybody,
I am testing the PTX backend using the OpenCL NVIDIA SDK benchmarks.
Compiling the Histogram64.cl program I get a several backend errors.
I isolated one of them in the following kernel program:
__kernel void kernel_function(__global int *input) {
__local char localArray[16];
for(unsigned int index = 0; index < 16; ++index)
localArray[index] = 0;
input[0] =
2012 Mar 05
0
[LLVMdev] Clang question
You'll need to do the work then. I'd also question why? On most platforms a decent memcpy exists.
-eric
On Mar 5, 2012, at 12:28 PM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> wrote:
> I would like it to always be lowered, I don't want it.
>
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com> wrote:
> You don't have memcpy or want it to
2012 Mar 05
6
[LLVMdev] Clang question
I would like it to always be lowered, I don't want it.
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com>wrote:
> You don't have memcpy or want it to always lower it?
>
> -eric
>
> On Mar 5, 2012, at 11:56 AM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Christoph,
> >
> > Yes, you are correct on the lifetime