Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "maxho".
Did you mean:
macho
1998 Jul 19
4
IMAPD fix for RH
...A07416 for <BUGTRAQ@NETSPACE.ORG>; Sat, 18 Jul 1998 16:00:10 -0400
Received: from unknown@netspace.org (port 9824 [128.148.157.6]) by
brimstone.netspace.org with ESMTP id <81164-2225>; Sat, 18 Jul 1998
16:02:16 -0400
Approved-By: aleph1@DFW.NET
Received: from ANARCHY.MAXHO.COM (ANARCHY.MAXHO.COM [206.20.110.150]) by
netspace.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA25501 for
<bugtraq@netspace.org>; Thu, 16 Jul 1998 23:26:59 -0400
Received: from localhost (twiztah@localhost) by ANARCHY.MAXHO.COM (8.9.0/8.8.7)
with SMTP id XAA00531 for <...
1998 Jul 15
0
Re: RedHat 5.X Security Book
...erful intro into system security, but it should
be made clear that it is not intended as a "fix-all".
Just my two cents.
-- Jason Welman
-----Original Message-----
From: David Gale <dgale@datapex.com>
To: Jon Lewis <jlewis@inorganic5.fdt.net>
Cc: twiztah <twiztah@ANARCHY.MAXHO.COM>; Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>;
linux-security@redhat.com <linux-security@redhat.com>
Date: Wednesday, July 15, 1998 2:15 AM
Subject: [linux-security] Re: RedHat 5.X Security Book
>On Sun, 12 Jul 1998, Jon Lewis wrote:
>
>> I still fully agree its a good idea to...
1998 Jul 10
2
Re: RedHat 5.X Security Book
[mod: This discussion has been going on "offline" with an occasional
CC to linux-security. By the time I got around to do another
"moderation round" this one was the latest. Everyone is keeping good
context, so I think you all will be able to follow the discussion. --REW]
>>>>> <seifried@seifried.org> writes:
>> The only thing I can see coming out