Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "maxfaten".
Did you mean:
mafate
2016 Feb 26
0
[PATCH 1/5] fat: fix minfatsize for large FAT32
...in the root-directory
> Fe is the FAT element size
> Nf is the number of FATs
> MaxFE is the maximum number of FAT entries
>
> As with the post above, we'll start with that last variable, since it is
> the one that is crucial to getting our computation right:
>
> MaxFatEn = Fs * Ss / Fe
>
> Now, if we follow Ady's post to compute the total number of sectors
> addressable, we want to have that number greater than the number of
> sectors reported for the volume, hence:
>
> (MaxFatEn - Nf) * Cs + Nf * Fs + Rs >= To
>
> Let's...
2016 Feb 26
4
[PATCH 1/5] fat: fix minfatsize for large FAT32
...s before the FAT's
Re is the entries in the root-directory
Fe is the FAT element size
Nf is the number of FATs
MaxFE is the maximum number of FAT entries
As with the post above, we'll start with that last variable, since it is
the one that is crucial to getting our computation right:
MaxFatEn = Fs * Ss / Fe
Now, if we follow Ady's post to compute the total number of sectors
addressable, we want to have that number greater than the number of
sectors reported for the volume, hence:
(MaxFatEn - Nf) * Cs + Nf * Fs + Rs >= To
Let's replace MaxFatEn:
((Fs * Ss / Fe) -...
2016 Feb 25
3
[PATCH 1/5] fat: fix minfatsize for large FAT32
Hi Ady,
On 2016.02.25 02:08, Ady via Syslinux wrote:
> There is an "extra" sector, in comparison to... what exactly?
Sorry if I wasn't clear. I think I implied that the Large FAT32 fat size
had an extra sector compared to minfatsize, when of course I meant the
opposite (the Large FAT32 has one less sector than the minfatsize
computed by the unpatched code, hence the check