Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "max_short".
Did you mean:
max_ushort
2016 Jan 22
2
fptosi undefined behaviour
On 22 January 2016 at 12:20, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> 1) I realise this is a somewhat silly question, but is this still
>> acceptable "undefined behaviour"?
>
> Yes, it is.
I always thought these out-of-range instructions did produce an
"undef" rather than allowing fully-general undefined behaviour
(otherwise we