Displaying 18 results from an estimated 18 matches for "max_rpmsg_num_buf".
Did you mean:
max_rpmsg_num_bufs
2020 Jun 05
0
[RFC 11/12] rpmsg: increase buffer size and reduce buffer number
...1add468 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/virtio_rpmsg.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/virtio_rpmsg.h
> > @@ -72,8 +72,8 @@ enum rpmsg_ns_flags {
> > * can change this without changing anything in the firmware of the remote
> > * processor.
> > */
> > -#define MAX_RPMSG_NUM_BUFS 512
> > -#define MAX_RPMSG_BUF_SIZE 512
> > +#define MAX_RPMSG_NUM_BUFS (512 / 32)
> > +#define MAX_RPMSG_BUF_SIZE (512 * 32)
>
> These have been a standard in the rpmsg protocol since the inception of the
> subsystem 9 years ago and can't be changed without serious...
2020 Sep 02
0
[PATCH v6 2/4] rpmsg: move common structures and defines to headers
...n also be used
> > - * to achieve zero-copy messaging.
> > - *
> > - * Note that these numbers are purely a decision of this driver - we
> > - * can change this without changing anything in the firmware of the remote
> > - * processor.
> > - */
> > -#define MAX_RPMSG_NUM_BUFS (512)
> > -#define MAX_RPMSG_BUF_SIZE (512)
> > -
> > /*
> > * Local addresses are dynamically allocated on-demand.
> > * We do not dynamically assign addresses from the low 1024 range,
> > @@ -162,9 +91,6 @@ struct virtio_rpmsg_channel {
> > */
>...
2020 Sep 03
0
[PATCH v6 2/4] rpmsg: move common structures and defines to headers
...> > > > - *
> > > > - * Note that these numbers are purely a decision of this driver - we
> > > > - * can change this without changing anything in the firmware of the remote
> > > > - * processor.
> > > > - */
> > > > -#define MAX_RPMSG_NUM_BUFS (512)
> > > > -#define MAX_RPMSG_BUF_SIZE (512)
> > > > -
> > > > /*
> > > > * Local addresses are dynamically allocated on-demand.
> > > > * We do not dynamically assign addresses from the low 1024 range,
> > > > @@ -162...
2020 Sep 01
8
[PATCH v6 0/4] Add a vhost RPMsg API
Hi,
Next update:
v6:
- rename include/linux/virtio_rpmsg.h -> include/linux/rpmsg/virtio.h
v5:
- don't hard-code message layout
v4:
- add endianness conversions to comply with the VirtIO standard
v3:
- address several checkpatch warnings
- address comments from Mathieu Poirier
v2:
- update patch #5 with a correct vhost_dev_init() prototype
- drop patch #6 - it depends on a different
2020 Sep 01
8
[PATCH v6 0/4] Add a vhost RPMsg API
Hi,
Next update:
v6:
- rename include/linux/virtio_rpmsg.h -> include/linux/rpmsg/virtio.h
v5:
- don't hard-code message layout
v4:
- add endianness conversions to comply with the VirtIO standard
v3:
- address several checkpatch warnings
- address comments from Mathieu Poirier
v2:
- update patch #5 with a correct vhost_dev_init() prototype
- drop patch #6 - it depends on a different
2020 May 16
9
[PATCH 0/6] Add a vhost RPMsg API
Linux supports RPMsg over VirtIO for "remote processor" /AMP use
cases. It can however also be used for virtualisation scenarios,
e.g. when using KVM to run Linux on both the host and the guests.
This patch set adds a wrapper API to facilitate writing vhost
drivers for such RPMsg-based solutions. The first use case is an
audio DSP virtualisation project, currently under development,
2020 May 16
9
[PATCH 0/6] Add a vhost RPMsg API
Linux supports RPMsg over VirtIO for "remote processor" /AMP use
cases. It can however also be used for virtualisation scenarios,
e.g. when using KVM to run Linux on both the host and the guests.
This patch set adds a wrapper API to facilitate writing vhost
drivers for such RPMsg-based solutions. The first use case is an
audio DSP virtualisation project, currently under development,
2020 May 25
6
[PATCH v2 0/5] Add a vhost RPMsg API
v2:
- remove "default n" from Kconfig
- drop patch #6 - it depends on a different patch, that is currently
an RFC
- update patch #5 with a correct vhost_dev_init() prototype
Linux supports RPMsg over VirtIO for "remote processor" /AMP use
cases. It can however also be used for virtualisation scenarios,
e.g. when using KVM to run Linux on both the host and the guests.
This
2020 May 27
10
[PATCH v3 0/5] Add a vhost RPMsg API
v3:
- address several checkpatch warnings
- address comments from Mathieu Poirier
v2:
- update patch #5 with a correct vhost_dev_init() prototype
- drop patch #6 - it depends on a different patch, that is currently
an RFC
- address comments from Pierre-Louis Bossart:
* remove "default n" from Kconfig
Linux supports RPMsg over VirtIO for "remote processor" /AMP use
cases.
2020 May 27
10
[PATCH v3 0/5] Add a vhost RPMsg API
v3:
- address several checkpatch warnings
- address comments from Mathieu Poirier
v2:
- update patch #5 with a correct vhost_dev_init() prototype
- drop patch #6 - it depends on a different patch, that is currently
an RFC
- address comments from Pierre-Louis Bossart:
* remove "default n" from Kconfig
Linux supports RPMsg over VirtIO for "remote processor" /AMP use
cases.
2020 Sep 10
6
[PATCH v7 0/3] Add a vhost RPMsg API
Hi,
Next update:
v7:
- remove documentation update to be send separately
- address comments from Mathieu Poirier (thanks)
v6:
- rename include/linux/virtio_rpmsg.h -> include/linux/rpmsg/virtio.h
v5:
- don't hard-code message layout
v4:
- add endianness conversions to comply with the VirtIO standard
v3:
- address several checkpatch warnings
- address comments from Mathieu Poirier
v2:
2020 Sep 10
6
[PATCH v7 0/3] Add a vhost RPMsg API
Hi,
Next update:
v7:
- remove documentation update to be send separately
- address comments from Mathieu Poirier (thanks)
v6:
- rename include/linux/virtio_rpmsg.h -> include/linux/rpmsg/virtio.h
v5:
- don't hard-code message layout
v4:
- add endianness conversions to comply with the VirtIO standard
v3:
- address several checkpatch warnings
- address comments from Mathieu Poirier
v2:
2020 Jul 22
13
[PATCH v4 0/4] Add a vhost RPMsg API
Hi,
Now that virtio-rpmsg endianness fixes have been merged we can
proceed with the next step.
v4:
- add endianness conversions to comply with the VirtIO standard
v3:
- address several checkpatch warnings
- address comments from Mathieu Poirier
v2:
- update patch #5 with a correct vhost_dev_init() prototype
- drop patch #6 - it depends on a different patch, that is currently
an RFC
-
2020 Jul 22
13
[PATCH v4 0/4] Add a vhost RPMsg API
Hi,
Now that virtio-rpmsg endianness fixes have been merged we can
proceed with the next step.
v4:
- add endianness conversions to comply with the VirtIO standard
v3:
- address several checkpatch warnings
- address comments from Mathieu Poirier
v2:
- update patch #5 with a correct vhost_dev_init() prototype
- drop patch #6 - it depends on a different patch, that is currently
an RFC
-
2020 May 29
15
[RFC 00/12] Audio DSP VirtIO and vhost drivers
This patch set is a follow up to "Add a vhost RPMsg API" [1], it is
marked as an RFC because firstly it depends on the RPMsg API series
and secondly it is currently being reviewed on ALSA and SOF mailing
lists, but any early comments from virtualisation developers would be
highly appreciated too!
Thanks
Guennadi
[1]
2020 May 29
15
[RFC 00/12] Audio DSP VirtIO and vhost drivers
This patch set is a follow up to "Add a vhost RPMsg API" [1], it is
marked as an RFC because firstly it depends on the RPMsg API series
and secondly it is currently being reviewed on ALSA and SOF mailing
lists, but any early comments from virtualisation developers would be
highly appreciated too!
Thanks
Guennadi
[1]
2020 Aug 26
12
[PATCH v5 0/4] Add a vhost RPMsg API
Hi,
Next update:
v5:
- don't hard-code message layout
v4:
- add endianness conversions to comply with the VirtIO standard
v3:
- address several checkpatch warnings
- address comments from Mathieu Poirier
v2:
- update patch #5 with a correct vhost_dev_init() prototype
- drop patch #6 - it depends on a different patch, that is currently
an RFC
- address comments from Pierre-Louis Bossart:
2020 Aug 26
12
[PATCH v5 0/4] Add a vhost RPMsg API
Hi,
Next update:
v5:
- don't hard-code message layout
v4:
- add endianness conversions to comply with the VirtIO standard
v3:
- address several checkpatch warnings
- address comments from Mathieu Poirier
v2:
- update patch #5 with a correct vhost_dev_init() prototype
- drop patch #6 - it depends on a different patch, that is currently
an RFC
- address comments from Pierre-Louis Bossart: