search for: max_rat

...0_outp_atomic_fix_depth(struct drm_encoder *encoder, struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state) +{ + struct nv50_head_atom *asyh = nv50_head_atom(crtc_state); + struct nouveau_encoder *nv_encoder = nouveau_encoder(encoder); + struct drm_display_mode *mode = &asyh->state.adjusted_mode; + unsigned int max_rate, mode_rate; + + switch (nv_encoder->dcb->type) { + case DCB_OUTPUT_DP: + max_rate = nv_encoder->dp.link_nr * nv_encoder->dp.link_bw; + + /* we don't support more than 10 anyway */ + asyh->or.bpc = max_t(u8, asyh->or.bpc, 10); + + /* reduce the bpc until it w...

...ates 1.5Mbps/384kbps. I do not make complete use of my pipe just in case of a massive burst. I know I will probably not burst such a massive burst, but its better to be safe than sorry. To help understand this, here are the classes and their associated bandwidths as I have them set in TC: (MAX_RATE is 360kbps) $TC qdisc add dev $IFext root handle 1: htb default 90 $TC class add dev $IFext parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate $MAX_RATE quantum $QUANTUM $TC class add dev $IFext parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 240kbps ceil $MAX_RATE prio 0 quantum $QUANTUM $TC class add dev $IFext...

...OUTING -o $DEV -s ! $P2P_IP -p tcp -m multiport --destination-ports 80,445,7777,7778,8080 -j MARK --set-mark 2 iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -o $DEV -m mark --mark 2 -j CLASSIFY --set-class $HTTP iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -o $DEV -m mark --mark 2 -j TOS --set-tos Maximize-Throughput MAX_RATE=30kbps P2P_UP=10kbps ## HTB CLASSES ## tc qdisc add dev $DEV root handle 1: htb default 30 tc class add dev $DEV parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate $MAX_RATE burst 15k tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid $P2P htb rate 3kbps ceil $P2P_UP burst 0 prio 2 quantum 1600 tc class add dev $DEV parent...

Ville also pointed out that I got a lot of the logic here wrong as well, whoops. While I don't think anyone's likely using 3D output with nouveau, the next patch will make nouveau_conn_mode_valid() make a lot less sense. So, let's just get rid of it and open-code it like before, while taking care to move the 3D frame packing calculations on the dot clock into the right place.

Just a backport of the two patches for v5.9 that you'll want to apply. The first one was Cc'd to stable, but I forgot to Cc the second one as well. Lyude Paul (2): drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Get rid of bogus nouveau_conn_mode_valid() drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Fix clock checking algorithm in nv50_dp_mode_valid() drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_connector.c | 36 ++++++---------------

...;intel_dp->mst_mgr, intel_connector->port); + return drm_dp_mst_detect_port(connector, &intel_dp->mst_mgr, + intel_connector->port); } static void @@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ intel_dp_mst_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *connector, int bpp = 24; /* MST uses fixed bpp */ int max_rate, mode_rate, max_lanes, max_link_clock; - if (!intel_dp) + if (intel_connector->mst_port_gone) return MODE_ERROR; if (mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_DBLSCAN) @@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ static struct drm_encoder *intel_mst_atomic_best_encoder(struct drm_connector *c struct intel_dp *intel...

...;intel_dp->mst_mgr, intel_connector->port); + return drm_dp_mst_detect_port(connector, &intel_dp->mst_mgr, + intel_connector->port); } static void @@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ intel_dp_mst_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *connector, int bpp = 24; /* MST uses fixed bpp */ int max_rate, mode_rate, max_lanes, max_link_clock; - if (!intel_dp) + if (intel_connector->mst_port_gone) return MODE_ERROR; if (mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_DBLSCAN) @@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ static struct drm_encoder *intel_mst_atomic_best_encoder(struct drm_connector *c struct intel_dp *intel...

...t(connector, &intel_dp->mst_mgr, > > + intel_connector->port); > > } > > > > static void > > @@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ intel_dp_mst_mode_valid(struct drm_connector > > *connector, > > int bpp = 24; /* MST uses fixed bpp */ > > int max_rate, mode_rate, max_lanes, max_link_clock; > > > > - if (!intel_dp) > > + if (intel_connector->mst_port_gone) > > return MODE_ERROR; > > > > if (mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_DBLSCAN) > > @@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ static struct drm_encoder > >...

...;intel_dp->mst_mgr, intel_connector->port); + return drm_dp_mst_detect_port(connector, &intel_dp->mst_mgr, + intel_connector->port); } static void @@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ intel_dp_mst_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *connector, int bpp = 24; /* MST uses fixed bpp */ int max_rate, mode_rate, max_lanes, max_link_clock; - if (!intel_dp) + if (intel_connector->mst_port_gone) return MODE_ERROR; if (mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_DBLSCAN) @@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ static struct drm_encoder *intel_mst_atomic_best_encoder(struct drm_connector *c struct intel_dp *intel...

I am using the script below to simulate a very high bandwidth connection.I find that I could not turn the bandwidth knob up to 100Mbit.I have had a look at this generally,but could not find an answer.any help would much appreciated as i have spent a lot of time on this and have not found any answers anywhere. In my test,I have four network cards and their rate are all 1000Mbps. my scripts:

...gt;port); > + return drm_dp_mst_detect_port(connector, &intel_dp->mst_mgr, > + intel_connector->port); > } > > static void > @@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ intel_dp_mst_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *connector, > int bpp = 24; /* MST uses fixed bpp */ > int max_rate, mode_rate, max_lanes, max_link_clock; > > - if (!intel_dp) > + if (intel_connector->mst_port_gone) > return MODE_ERROR; > > if (mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_DBLSCAN) > @@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ static struct drm_encoder *intel_mst_atomic_best_encoder(struct drm_co...

I am trying to configure a VegaStream 50 FXO to work with asterisk. The problem that I am having is that the VegaStream does not support incoming registration from asterisk. VegaStream only allows outbound registration. My question is does asterisk allow incoming registration from an FXO? If yes how? Or better yet, has anybody been able to make the VegaStream FXO work with asterisk? According

Next version of https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/49878/ . No changes, except that these patches are against master so hopefully intel's CI doesn't get confused this time. Lyude Paul (5): drm/atomic_helper: Disallow new modesets on unregistered connectors drm/nouveau: Fix nv50_mstc->best_encoder() drm/i915: Leave intel_conn->mst_port set, use mst_port_gone instead

Next version of https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/49877/ This fixes some rather silly bugs regarding DPMS On->Off changes failing for connectors which were just recently destroyed. Lyude Paul (5): drm/atomic_helper: Disallow new modesets on unregistered connectors drm/nouveau: Fix nv50_mstc->best_encoder() drm/i915: Leave intel_conn->mst_port set, use mst_port_gone instead

Latest version of https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/49878/ Lyude Paul (5): drm/atomic_helper: Disallow new modesets on unregistered connectors drm/nouveau: Fix nv50_mstc->best_encoder() drm/i915: Don't unset intel_connector->mst_port drm/i915: Skip vcpi allocation for MSTB ports that are gone drm/i915: Fix intel_dp_mst_best_encoder()

Next version of https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/49878/ No functional changes, just a typo fix Lyude Paul (5): drm/atomic_helper: Disallow new modesets on unregistered connectors drm/nouveau: Fix nv50_mstc->best_encoder() drm/i915: Don't unset intel_connector->mst_port drm/i915: Skip vcpi allocation for MSTB ports that are gone drm/i915: Fix

Next version of https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/49878/ Still no functional changes, just removing a duplicate s-b to make CI happy. Lyude Paul (5): drm/atomic_helper: Disallow new modesets on unregistered connectors drm/nouveau: Fix nv50_mstc->best_encoder() drm/i915: Don't unset intel_connector->mst_port drm/i915: Skip vcpi allocation for MSTB ports that are gone

Hi all, I've frustrated myself the last few days yelling at our link training code. Comparing the i915 code to radeon and nouveau I've noticed the lack of a nice set of dp helper functions. So I've started to extract a few. There's lots more that we can do I think (link configuration selection, the i2c over aux retry stuff which diverges already between i915 and radeon, maybe