search for: max_lans

Currently we set intel_connector->mst_port to NULL to signify that the MST port has been removed from the system so that we can prevent further action on the port such as connector probes, mode probing, etc. However, we're going to need access to intel_connector->mst_port in order to fixup ->best_encoder() so that it can always return the correct encoder for an MST port to prevent

Currently we set intel_connector->mst_port to NULL to signify that the MST port has been removed from the system so that we can prevent further action on the port such as connector probes, mode probing, etc. However, we're going to need access to intel_connector->mst_port in order to fixup ->best_encoder() so that it can always return the correct encoder for an MST port to prevent

On Fri, 2018-09-21 at 11:27 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 07:06:19PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > > Currently we set intel_connector->mst_port to NULL to signify that the > > MST port has been removed from the system so that we can prevent further > > action on the port such as connector probes, mode probing, etc. > > However, we're going to

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 04:04:56PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > Since DP 1.3, it's been possible for DP receivers to specify an > additional set of DPCD capabilities, which can take precedence over the > capabilities reported at DP_DPCD_REV. > > Basically any device supporting DP is going to need to read these in an > identical manner, in particular nouveau, so let's go

Currently we set intel_connector->mst_port to NULL to signify that the MST port has been removed from the system so that we can prevent further action on the port such as connector probes, mode probing, etc. However, we're going to need access to intel_connector->mst_port in order to fixup ->best_encoder() so that it can always return the correct encoder for an MST port to prevent

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 07:06:19PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > Currently we set intel_connector->mst_port to NULL to signify that the > MST port has been removed from the system so that we can prevent further > action on the port such as connector probes, mode probing, etc. > However, we're going to need access to intel_connector->mst_port in > order to fixup

Since DP 1.3, it's been possible for DP receivers to specify an additional set of DPCD capabilities, which can take precedence over the capabilities reported at DP_DPCD_REV. Basically any device supporting DP is going to need to read these in an identical manner, in particular nouveau, so let's go ahead and just move this code out of i915 into a shared DRM DP helper that we can use in

Next version of https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/49878/ . No changes, except that these patches are against master so hopefully intel's CI doesn't get confused this time. Lyude Paul (5): drm/atomic_helper: Disallow new modesets on unregistered connectors drm/nouveau: Fix nv50_mstc->best_encoder() drm/i915: Leave intel_conn->mst_port set, use mst_port_gone instead

Next version of https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/49877/ This fixes some rather silly bugs regarding DPMS On->Off changes failing for connectors which were just recently destroyed. Lyude Paul (5): drm/atomic_helper: Disallow new modesets on unregistered connectors drm/nouveau: Fix nv50_mstc->best_encoder() drm/i915: Leave intel_conn->mst_port set, use mst_port_gone instead

Latest version of https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/49878/ Lyude Paul (5): drm/atomic_helper: Disallow new modesets on unregistered connectors drm/nouveau: Fix nv50_mstc->best_encoder() drm/i915: Don't unset intel_connector->mst_port drm/i915: Skip vcpi allocation for MSTB ports that are gone drm/i915: Fix intel_dp_mst_best_encoder()

Next version of https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/49878/ No functional changes, just a typo fix Lyude Paul (5): drm/atomic_helper: Disallow new modesets on unregistered connectors drm/nouveau: Fix nv50_mstc->best_encoder() drm/i915: Don't unset intel_connector->mst_port drm/i915: Skip vcpi allocation for MSTB ports that are gone drm/i915: Fix

...Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA + */ +//#define DEBUG +#include <linux/netdevice.h> +#include <linux/etherdevice.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/mm_types.h> +#include <linux/lguest_bus.h> +#include <asm/io.h> + +#define SHARED_SIZE PAGE_SIZE +#define MAX_LANS 4 +#define NUM_SKBS 8 + +struct lguestnet_info +{ + /* The shared page(s). */ + struct lguest_net *peer; + unsigned long peer_phys; + unsigned long mapsize; + + /* My peerid. */ + unsigned int me; + + /* Receive queue. */ + struct sk_buff *skb[NUM_SKBS]; + struct lguest_dma dma[NUM_SKBS]; +}; + +...

...Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA + */ +//#define DEBUG +#include <linux/netdevice.h> +#include <linux/etherdevice.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/mm_types.h> +#include <linux/lguest_bus.h> +#include <asm/io.h> + +#define SHARED_SIZE PAGE_SIZE +#define MAX_LANS 4 +#define NUM_SKBS 8 + +struct lguestnet_info +{ + /* The shared page(s). */ + struct lguest_net *peer; + unsigned long peer_phys; + unsigned long mapsize; + + /* My peerid. */ + unsigned int me; + + /* Receive queue. */ + struct sk_buff *skb[NUM_SKBS]; + struct lguest_dma dma[NUM_SKBS]; +}; + +...

Next version of https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/49878/ Still no functional changes, just removing a duplicate s-b to make CI happy. Lyude Paul (5): drm/atomic_helper: Disallow new modesets on unregistered connectors drm/nouveau: Fix nv50_mstc->best_encoder() drm/i915: Don't unset intel_connector->mst_port drm/i915: Skip vcpi allocation for MSTB ports that are gone

Hi all, I've frustrated myself the last few days yelling at our link training code. Comparing the i915 code to radeon and nouveau I've noticed the lack of a nice set of dp helper functions. So I've started to extract a few. There's lots more that we can do I think (link configuration selection, the i2c over aux retry stuff which diverges already between i915 and radeon, maybe

To start off: this patch series is less work to review then it looks - most (but not all) of the nouveau related work has already been reviewed elsewhere. Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers. Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while. Other then the occasional runtime PM

Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers. Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while. Other then the occasional runtime PM related and MST related fixes, we're missing a lot of nice things that have been added to DRM since this was originally written. Additionally, the code

To start off: this patch series is less work to review then it looks - most (but not all) of the nouveau related work has already been reviewed elsewhere. Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers. Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while. Other then the occasional runtime PM

Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers. Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while. Other then the occasional runtime PM related and MST related fixes, we're missing a lot of nice things that have been added to DRM since this was originally written. Additionally, the code

Hi all, These are the patches I'm planning to submit for 2.6.24. Comments gratefully accepted. Along with the usual cleanups and improvements are Jes' de-i386-ification patches, and a new "virtio" mechanism designed to be shared with KVM (and hopefully other hypervisors). Cheers, Rusty. Documentation/lguest/Makefile | 30 Documentation/lguest/lguest.c