search for: max_file_seq

I'm running Dovecot version 1.2.11 and getting this assertion error on a user's mail: Panic: file /home/durket/dovecot-1.2.11/src/lib-index/mail-transaction-log-view.c: line 290 (mail_transaction_log_view_set): assertion failed: (min_file_seq != max_file_seq || max_file_seq != view->head->hdr.file_seq || max_file_offset != (uoff_t)-1 || min_file_offset <= view->head->sync_offset) I realize that there are newer releases of Dovecot (that even may fix this bug) but what I need to know is if there's anything I can do (like having Dovec...

I'm seeing this periodically in my logs for a specific user (followed by a backtrace which I've deleted from this post): Panic: file dovecot-1.2.11/src/lib-index/mail-transaction-log-view.c: line 290 (mail_transaction_log_view_set): assertion failed: (min_file_seq != max_file_seq || max_file_seq != view->head->hdr.file_seq || max_file_offset != (uoff_t)-1 || min_file_offset <= view->head->sync_offset) Is there something I can do to work around this problem for the user, or is this something new and I need to follow the instructions at http://dovecot.org/b...

...nc: UID inserted in the middle of mailbox (47681 > 47680, file = 1138960753.P9796Q0M642679.elfstone:2,T) dovecot.log.1.gz:Feb 24 16:20:48 elfstone dovecot: imap(user4 at domain.tld): file mail-transaction-log-view.c: line 140 (mail_transaction_log_view_set): assertion failed: (min_file_seq != max_file_seq || min_file_offset <= max_file_offset) dovecot.log.1.gz:Feb 24 16:21:16 elfstone dovecot: imap(user4 at domain.tld): file mail-transaction-log-view.c: line 140 (mail_transaction_log_view_set): assertion failed: (min_file_seq != max_file_seq || min_file_offset <= max_file_offset) dovecot.l...

...ing moved to using Apple mail.app for offline imap reading (served by a dovecot 1.0-test59 server), I noticed the following in the logs: Feb 14 13:52:48 top dovecot: 3102(schmitta): file mail-transaction-log-view.c: line 86 (mail_transaction_log_view_set): assertion failed: (min_file_seq <= max_file_seq) Is this bad? Would upgrading to a newer version of dovecot help in this case? Thanks, Alan Schmitt -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iD8DBQFCEKDFNIAqM4hFUWgRAjfeAKCRpPafj/Pfhbi4wh1YFHnRxbPx3QCfSMqY S3nnORob3OXAfkDre1o7x5s= =iBoA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

...mentation fault. Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libc.so.34.2...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libc.so.34.2 Reading symbols from /usr/libexec/ld.so...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/libexec/ld.so #0 0x1c03d7f2 in mail_transaction_log_view_set (view=0x3c020500, min_file_seq=8, min_file_offset=7148, max_file_seq=8, max_file_offset=7148, type_mask=8) at mail-transaction-log-view.c:102 102 if (min_file_seq == view->log->tail->hdr.prev_file_seq && (gdb) #0 0x1c03d7f2 in mail_transaction_log_view_set (view=0x3c020500, min_file_seq=8, min_file_offset=7148, max_file_seq=8,...

...ib/libiconv.so.4.0 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libc.so.39.0...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libc.so.39.0 Reading symbols from /usr/libexec/ld.so...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/libexec/ld.so #0 0x1c04895a in mail_transaction_log_view_set (view=0x7f0b8300, min_file_seq=2, min_file_offset=208, max_file_seq=2, max_file_offset=208, type_mask=MAIL_TRANSACTION_APPEND) at mail-transaction-log-view.c:107 107 if (min_file_seq == view->log->tail->hdr.prev_file_seq && (gdb) bt #0 0x1c04895a in mail_transaction_log_view_set (view=0x7f0b8300, min_file_seq=2, min_file_offset=208...

...9:05 gehenna17.rutgers.edu dovecot: IMAP(user): fscking index file /rci/nqu/rci/u2/user/dovecot/.INBOX/dovecot.index Jan 27 20:49:05 gehenna17.rutgers.edu dovecot: IMAP(user): Panic: file mail-transaction-log-view.c: line 108 (mail_transaction_log_view_set): assertion failed: (min_file_seq <= max_file_seq) Jan 27 20:49:05 gehenna17.rutgers.edu dovecot: IMAP(user): Raw backtrace: /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap [0x49ede0] -> /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap [0x49ee43] -> /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap [0x49e4a6] -> /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap(mail_transaction_log_view_set+0x4ac) [0x486e1c] -> /usr/libex...

http://dovecot.org/test/ Just mbox fixes since 1.0-test16. The logic is simpler and more correct now. Can anyone break it anymore? I actually tested it a while with Evolution and several mailboxes and it didn't break at least immediately. :) Now maybe a few more days and I dare trying this thing myself with my real mboxes (yes, I'm still using them). Dovecot mailing list archives could

...fo: msgid=<...>: save failed to INBOX: Internal error occurred. Refer to server log for more information. [2009-04-10 14:56:20] dovecot: Apr 10 14:56:40 Panic: IMAP(user): file mail-transaction-log- view.c: line 103 (mail_transaction_log_view_set): assertion failed: (min_file_seq <= max_file_seq) dovecot: Apr 10 14:56:40 Error: IMAP(user): Raw backtrace: [see below for better backtrace] deliver(user): Apr 10 14:56:45 Error: Transaction log file /Volumes/ MailData/user/dovecot.index.log: marked corrupted deliver(user): Apr 10 14:57:04 Info: msgid=<...>: saved mail to INBOX deliver(...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 dovecot: Jan 18 10:48:39 Error: IMAP(bfg at noviforum.si): file mail-transaction-log-view.c: line 138 (mail_transaction_log_view_set): assertion failed: (min_file_seq != max_file_seq ~ || min_file_offset <= max_file_offset) dovecot: Jan 18 10:48:39 Error: child 18837 (imap) killed with signal 6 dovecot: Jan 18 10:48:52 Info: imap-login: Login: gregord at noviforum.si [127.0.0.1] dovecot: Jan 18 10:48:58 Info: imap-login: Login: bfg at noviforum.si [192.168.2.14] dovecot: Jan...

...11:39:34 Warning: IMAP(neko at it4u.lv): fscking index file /srv/vmail/.cache/it4u.lv/neko/.Listservers.Tech.Dovecot/dovecot.index dovecot: Jul 02 11:39:34 Error: IMAP(neko at it4u.lv): file mail-transaction-log-view.c: line 107 (mail_transaction_log_view_set): assertion failed: (min_file_seq <= max_file_seq) dovecot: Jul 02 11:39:34 Error: IMAP(neko at it4u.lv): Raw backtrace: imap [0x5555555bd66e] -> imap [0x5555555bd3ae] -> imap(mail_transaction_log_view_set+0x3b3) [0x5555555aba23] -> imap [0x5555555a6d1f] -> imap(mail_index_view_sync_begin+0x3f3) [0x5555555a73d3] -> imap(index_mailbo...

We recently upgraded from Dovecot 1.2.4 to 1.2.6 (with the sieve patches of course). Everything has been running quite well since the upgrade. The occasional issue with assert-crashing when expunging has gone away. However, one of our users seems to have triggered a new issue. She's been the only one to see it, but whenever she logs in, her imap process segfaults immediately. It appears that

...args=0xbfdb2944 "?}\f\bk") at failures.c:403 #4 0x080aeafc in i_panic ( format=0x80bea9c "file %s: line %d (%s): assertion failed: (%s)") at failures.c:183 #5 0x0809d23a in mail_transaction_log_view_set (view=0x929e2a0, min_file_seq=0, min_file_offset=26588, max_file_seq=1, max_file_offset=2280, type_mask=MAIL_TRANSACTION_EXPUNGE) at mail-transaction-log-view.c:107 #6 0x08097ce2 in view_sync_set_log_view_range (view=0x928db88, type_mask=<value optimized out>) at mail-index-view-sync.c:103 #7 0x08098279 in mail_index_view_sync_begin (view=0x0,...

...out>) at failures.c:263 #5 0x000000080081bdb6 in mail_transaction_log_file_map (file=0x801670e00, start_offset=40, end_offset=18446744073709551615) at mail-transaction-log-file.c:1694 #6 0x000000080081da41 in mail_transaction_log_view_set (view=0x801654a80, min_file_seq=1, min_file_offset=40, max_file_seq=2, max_file_offset=18446744073709551615, reset_r=0x7fffffffbedf) at mail-transaction-log-view.c:228 #7 0x000000080081519d in mail_index_sync_map (_map=0x801670b08, type=MAIL_INDEX_SYNC_HANDLER_HEAD, force=false) at mail-index-sync-update.c:950 #8 0x0000000800805be0 in mail_index_map (index=0x...

Hello all. I've just recently (this last weekend) migrated to Dovecot on my FreeBSD 4.x box. So far, so good, I like it a lot, and plan on moving mboxes to Maildirs sometime this next weekend. BUT....I've currently run into a problem. I'm seeing an error when one user account tries to access the INBOX from Squirrelmail: Mar 6 16:50:59 cerebus dovecot: IMAP(problemuser): file

Hi. I don't know if the problem is related with squirrelmail or not, but I started to have index corruption when I started to try squirrelmail. Some informaton about my instalation: dovecot 1.0.5-1 debian package with maildir squirrelmail 1.4.9a-2 debian package Some log information: dovecot: 2008-02-27 08:39:39 Warning: IMAP(<please don't send spam to me>): fscking index file