search for: matthewbg

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "matthewbg".

2012 Mar 29
1
[LLVMdev] GSoC: Proposal for LLVM performance audit
Hi all, I am a candidate for GSoC 2012 and I am looking forward to applying to LLVM this year. I talked to a few people on IRC: chandlerc, matthewbg, who were very helpful and directed me to post my idea on the list. As for my background, I work as a server-analyst for HostDime so my job includes conducting audits on server performance that our company hosts which are linux based and some VPS that utilize Xen, so I have a decent background in v...
2012 Oct 03
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] patch to enable response file support in ParseCommandLineOptions
...e is the conventional name for files serving this purpose. A google search shows the usage of "response file" is not rare. Also it has been used in the LLVM documentation: http://llvm.org/docs/CommandLine.html#response-files Sam -----Original Message----- From: Matt Beaumont-Gay [mailto:matthewbg at google.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2012 1:35 PM To: Liu, Yaxun (Sam) Cc: Chris Lattner; llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [llvm-commits] patch to enable response file support in ParseCommandLineOptions Can we call this a "parameters file"? I find &q...
2012 Mar 29
0
[LLVMdev] GSoC: Proposal for LLVM performance audit
...l, here is my proper email address. - Vikram On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Vikram Dhillon <dhillonv10 at knights.ucf.edu> wrote: > Hi all, > > I am a candidate for GSoC 2012 and I am looking forward to applying to > LLVM this year. I talked to a few people on IRC: chandlerc, matthewbg, > who were very helpful and directed me to post my idea on the list. As > for my background, I work as a server-analyst for HostDime so my job > includes conducting audits on server performance that our company > hosts which are linux based and some VPS that utilize Xen, so I have a &g...
2012 Aug 22
1
[LLVMdev] buildbot failure in LLVM on clang-native-mingw64-win7
...; Blamelist: aaronballman,ahatanak,alexfh,anithab,asl,baldrick,bwilson,chandlerc,chapuni,criswell,ctopper,d0k,dblaikie,ddunbar,delesley,dgregor,djasper,dyatkovskiy,echristo,efriedma,evancheng,fjahanian,gps,gribozavr,grosbach,grosser,hanm,hans,hliao,jacksprat,jaykang10,jrose,jush,kcc,klimek,kremenek,matthewbg,mcrosier,mspencer,nadav,nicholas,panzer,pranavb,rafael,rdivacky,resistor,rjmccall,rsmith,rtrieu,spop,spyffe,stoklund,tbrethou,tnorthover,victorm,void,zaks > > BUILD FAILED: failed clang-test > > sincerely, > -The Buildbot > > >
2012 Oct 02
1
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] patch to enable response file support in ParseCommandLineOptions
Can we call this a "parameters file"? I find "response file" to be non-obvious. On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Liu, Yaxun (Sam) <Yaxun.Liu at amd.com> wrote: > Thanks Chris for the comment. > > > > Since there is no objection, I attached a new patch which enables response > file support and removes the argument for controlling/disabling response >
2012 Oct 02
3
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] patch to enable response file support in ParseCommandLineOptions
Thanks Chris for the comment. Since there is no objection, I attached a new patch which enables response file support and removes the argument for controlling/disabling response file support. The patch also contains a simple test. I did regression check and there are no regressions. + llvmdev Sam From: Chris Lattner [mailto:clattner at apple.com] Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2012 2:20 PM To: