Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "matthewbg".
2012 Mar 29
1
[LLVMdev] GSoC: Proposal for LLVM performance audit
Hi all,
I am a candidate for GSoC 2012 and I am looking forward to applying to
LLVM this year. I talked to a few people on IRC: chandlerc, matthewbg,
who were very helpful and directed me to post my idea on the list. As
for my background, I work as a server-analyst for HostDime so my job
includes conducting audits on server performance that our company
hosts which are linux based and some VPS that utilize Xen, so I have a
decent background in v...
2012 Oct 03
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] patch to enable response file support in ParseCommandLineOptions
...e is the conventional name for files serving this purpose. A google search shows the usage of "response file" is not rare. Also it has been used in the LLVM documentation:
http://llvm.org/docs/CommandLine.html#response-files
Sam
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Beaumont-Gay [mailto:matthewbg at google.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2012 1:35 PM
To: Liu, Yaxun (Sam)
Cc: Chris Lattner; llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
Subject: Re: [llvm-commits] patch to enable response file support in ParseCommandLineOptions
Can we call this a "parameters file"? I find &q...
2012 Mar 29
0
[LLVMdev] GSoC: Proposal for LLVM performance audit
...l, here is my proper email address.
- Vikram
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Vikram Dhillon
<dhillonv10 at knights.ucf.edu> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am a candidate for GSoC 2012 and I am looking forward to applying to
> LLVM this year. I talked to a few people on IRC: chandlerc, matthewbg,
> who were very helpful and directed me to post my idea on the list. As
> for my background, I work as a server-analyst for HostDime so my job
> includes conducting audits on server performance that our company
> hosts which are linux based and some VPS that utilize Xen, so I have a
&g...
2012 Aug 22
1
[LLVMdev] buildbot failure in LLVM on clang-native-mingw64-win7
...; Blamelist: aaronballman,ahatanak,alexfh,anithab,asl,baldrick,bwilson,chandlerc,chapuni,criswell,ctopper,d0k,dblaikie,ddunbar,delesley,dgregor,djasper,dyatkovskiy,echristo,efriedma,evancheng,fjahanian,gps,gribozavr,grosbach,grosser,hanm,hans,hliao,jacksprat,jaykang10,jrose,jush,kcc,klimek,kremenek,matthewbg,mcrosier,mspencer,nadav,nicholas,panzer,pranavb,rafael,rdivacky,resistor,rjmccall,rsmith,rtrieu,spop,spyffe,stoklund,tbrethou,tnorthover,victorm,void,zaks
>
> BUILD FAILED: failed clang-test
>
> sincerely,
> -The Buildbot
>
>
>
2012 Oct 02
1
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] patch to enable response file support in ParseCommandLineOptions
Can we call this a "parameters file"? I find "response file" to be non-obvious.
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Liu, Yaxun (Sam) <Yaxun.Liu at amd.com> wrote:
> Thanks Chris for the comment.
>
>
>
> Since there is no objection, I attached a new patch which enables response
> file support and removes the argument for controlling/disabling response
>
2012 Oct 02
3
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] patch to enable response file support in ParseCommandLineOptions
Thanks Chris for the comment.
Since there is no objection, I attached a new patch which enables response file support and removes the argument for controlling/disabling response file support. The patch also contains a simple test. I did regression check and there are no regressions.
+ llvmdev
Sam
From: Chris Lattner [mailto:clattner at apple.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2012 2:20 PM
To: