search for: matrixtranspose

Displaying 15 results from an estimated 15 matches for "matrixtranspose".

2002 Dec 07
0
[LLVMdev] Counting # dynamic instructions in a benchmark
...ch: http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20021202/001862.html This patch adds a new statistic to LLI which indicates the number of dynamic instructions executed by the program. With this patch enabled, you can run LLI like this: $ cd test/Programs/SingleSource $ make Output/matrixTranspose.llvm.bc $ lli -stats Output/matrixTranspose.llvm.bc Checksum before = 2096128.000000 Checksum after = 2096128.000000 Function int (int, sbyte**)* "main" returned int 0 ===-------------------------------------------------------------------------=== ... Statistics...
2012 Feb 19
2
[LLVMdev] Problem While Running Test Suite
...ngleSource/Regression/C/2003-06-16-InvalidInitializer | * | * | SingleSource/Regression/C/casts | * | * | SingleSource/Regression/C/2004-08-12-InlinerAndAllocas | * | * | SingleSource/Regression/C/matrixTranspose | * | * | SingleSource/Regression/C/PR491 | * | * | SingleSource/Regression/C/2004-02-03-AggregateCopy | * | * | SingleSource/Regression/C++/2003-06-13-Crasher...
2008 Feb 03
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
...0.00 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/globalrefs | 0.0035 1008 0.0042 * 0.0040 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/matrixTranspose | 0.0103 1356 0.0069 * 0.0067 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/pointer_arithmetic | 0.0038 460 0.0014 * 0.0014...
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
...0.00 * 0.03 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/globalrefs | 0.0080 1008 0.0040 * 0.0040 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/matrixTranspose | 0.0080 1292 0.0040 * 0.0080 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/pointer_arithmetic | 0.0000 444 0.0000 * 0.0040...
2008 Jan 24
6
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
...0.00 * 0.03 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/globalrefs | 0.0038 1000 0.0100 * 0.0032 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/matrixTranspose | 0.0097 1304 0.0066 * 0.0087 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/pointer_arithmetic | 0.0037 456 0.0011 * 0.0011...
2008 Jan 28
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
...0.00 * * | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/globalrefs | 0.0014 1052 0.0026 * 0.0026 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/matrixTranspose | 0.0045 1432 0.0030 * 0.0032 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/pointer_arithmetic | 0.0013 480 0.0007 * 0.0006...
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
...      0.03 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/Regression/C/globalrefs                                     | > 0.0000 932      0.0000      *                0.0000      |    0.01    0.00 >  0.01 *           0.01 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/Regression/C/matrixTranspose                                | > 0.0100 1364     0.0100      *                0.0100      |    0.00    0.00 >  0.00 *           0.01 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/Regression/C/pointer_arithmetic                             | > 0.0100 488      0.0000      *        ...
2009 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
Hi Tanya, > 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects > directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a > pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories. Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu. > 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note > that you need to
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
...- n/a n/a > SingleSource/Regression/C/ > globalrefs | 0.0000 932 > 0.0000 * 0.0000 | 0.01 0.00 0.01 > * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a > SingleSource/Regression/C/ > matrixTranspose | 0.0100 1364 > 0.0100 * 0.0100 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 > * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a > SingleSource/Regression/C/ > pointer_arithmetic | 0.0100 488 > 0.0000...
2007 Sep 15
22
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download
2009 Oct 17
12
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
LLVMers, 2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community. http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. To test llvm-gcc: 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre- compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. 2) Run make check,
2009 Feb 07
11
[LLVMdev] 2.5 Pre-release1 available for testing
LLVMers, The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. Please do the following: 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can). 2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log 3) Run "make
2014 Jan 28
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
Hi Stepan, Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to improve MergeFunctions. Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its capability
2014 Jan 30
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
...0.01 54131 0 0.02 54131 mason.ll 10 49163 1 0.01 48786 * * * matchpat.ll 1 30952 0 0.01 30926 0 0.01 30926 matmul_f64_4x4.ll 3 47703 0 0.01 47688 0 0.01 47688 matrix_dec.ll 9 60244 0 0.02 60221 0 0.02 59501 matrix_enc.ll 6 52336 0 0.01 52313 0 0.02 50612 matrix.ll 6 16895 0 0.01 16876 0 0.01 16876 matrixTranspose.ll 2 11809 0 0.01 11797 0 0.01 11797 maze.ll 18 150317 0 0.02 150294 0 0.02 150294 mb_access.ll 9 109296 0 0.02 109275 0 0.02 107910 mbuffer.ll 72 1035547 0 0.09 1035526 * * * md5.ll 7 107655 0 0.02 107629 0 0.02 107629 md_highfast.ll 1 163560 0 0.02 163539 0 0.02 163539 md_high.ll 1 124678 0 0.02...